Influence of Herbicide Site Preparation on Longleaf Pine Ecosystem Development and Fire Management

R. Addington, T. A. Greene, Michele L. Elmore, Catherine E. Prior, Wade C. Harrison
{"title":"Influence of Herbicide Site Preparation on Longleaf Pine Ecosystem Development and Fire Management","authors":"R. Addington, T. A. Greene, Michele L. Elmore, Catherine E. Prior, Wade C. Harrison","doi":"10.5849/SJAF.11-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Herbicide site preparation is common in longleaf pine artificial regeneration and restoration to reduce competition and promote seedling establishment. However, few studies have evaluated longer-term influences of herbicide site preparation on ecosystem development and fire management. We report results from a field study on Fort Benning, Georgia, initiated in 2003 to evaluate the response of longleaf pine seedlings, woody plant stem density, herbaceous vegetation cover, species richness, and fine fuels to two herbicide site preparation treatments: imazapyr/glyphosate and hexazinone. Both treatments clearly enhanced longleaf pine seedling growth compared with an untreated control, primarily by reducing hardwood stem densities. By 2009, hardwood stem density was 5 times as high on control plots compared with treated plots. Vegetation composition and structure were otherwise similar, with no differences in shrubs and woody vines, perennial bunch grasses, or species richness on treated versus control plots. Total herbaceous fuels were enhanced by hexazinone in particular, which bodes well for fire management and continued hardwood control. Alternatively, increased woody litter on control plots appeared to modify the fuel bed in ways that may inhibit fire management. Overall, results suggest that treated plots are better poised than control plots for restoration success without additional treatments beyond fire.","PeriodicalId":51154,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Applied Forestry","volume":"36 1","pages":"173-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5849/SJAF.11-012","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Journal of Applied Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5849/SJAF.11-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Herbicide site preparation is common in longleaf pine artificial regeneration and restoration to reduce competition and promote seedling establishment. However, few studies have evaluated longer-term influences of herbicide site preparation on ecosystem development and fire management. We report results from a field study on Fort Benning, Georgia, initiated in 2003 to evaluate the response of longleaf pine seedlings, woody plant stem density, herbaceous vegetation cover, species richness, and fine fuels to two herbicide site preparation treatments: imazapyr/glyphosate and hexazinone. Both treatments clearly enhanced longleaf pine seedling growth compared with an untreated control, primarily by reducing hardwood stem densities. By 2009, hardwood stem density was 5 times as high on control plots compared with treated plots. Vegetation composition and structure were otherwise similar, with no differences in shrubs and woody vines, perennial bunch grasses, or species richness on treated versus control plots. Total herbaceous fuels were enhanced by hexazinone in particular, which bodes well for fire management and continued hardwood control. Alternatively, increased woody litter on control plots appeared to modify the fuel bed in ways that may inhibit fire management. Overall, results suggest that treated plots are better poised than control plots for restoration success without additional treatments beyond fire.
除草剂立地预备对长叶松生态系统发育及火灾管理的影响
在长叶松人工更新恢复中,为减少竞争和促进幼苗成苗,常用除草剂场地预备。然而,很少有研究评估除草剂立地制备对生态系统发展和火灾管理的长期影响。作者报告了2003年在美国佐治亚州本宁堡开展的一项野外研究的结果,该研究评估了长叶松幼苗、木本植物茎密度、草本植被覆盖度、物种丰富度和细燃料对两种除草剂现场制备处理的响应:imazapyr/草甘膦和hexazinone。与未经处理的对照相比,两种处理都明显促进了长叶松幼苗的生长,主要是通过降低硬木茎密度。2009年,对照区阔叶树茎密度是处理区阔叶树茎密度的5倍。在其他方面,植被组成和结构相似,灌木和木本藤本植物、多年生束草和物种丰富度在处理区与对照区没有差异。特别是己嗪酮增加了草本燃料的总量,这对火灾管理和持续的硬木控制来说是一个好兆头。另外,控制地块上增加的木质凋落物似乎以抑制火灾管理的方式改变了燃料床。总的来说,结果表明,在没有除火以外的其他处理的情况下,处理过的样地比对照样地更容易恢复成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信