{"title":"Pine Straw Harvesting, Fire, and Fertilization Affect Understory Vegetation within a Louisiana Longleaf Pine Stand","authors":"J. Haywood","doi":"10.5849/SJAF.10-054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pine straw harvesting con provide on economic benefit to landowners, but the practice may also change the composition of plant communities. This research was initiated in o 34-yeor-old stand of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.} established in 1956 to study how pine straw management practices (fertilization, prescribed fire, and straw harvesting) affected plant communities, and herein, effects on understory vegetation ore reported. A randomized complete block split-plot design was installed with two main plots: (1) no fertilization and (2) fertilization three times with different combinations of N, P, and K. There were four subplot treatments: (l) control, (2} prescribed fire, (3} prescribed fire and 2 harvests of pine straw, and (4) 13 annual harvests of pine straw. Fertilization significantly increased gross cover os o percentage of surface oreo. However, there was o general lock of understory plant response to nutrient amendments, portly because pine straw harvesting and burning were confounding fertilization effects. Prescribed fire and mechanical harvesting activities created similar understories on subplot treatments 2, 3, and 4 by significantly reducing understory woody plant stature and removing litter. Increases in understory tree and shrub stature, number of woody vines per acre, and percentage of woody plant cover significantly decreased herbaceous plant yields and percentage of cover. P ine straw, a renewable natural resource, has traditionally been harvested for mulch Qemison 1943, Bateman and Wilson 1961, Makus et al. 1994). Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) straw is considered to be one of the best sources of landscape mulch among the southern pines (Mississippi State University 2011) and can bring a higher price per bale than pine straw bales from other southern pine species (Dickens et al. 20 11). Adding pine straw to timber and forage as products of management can increase profits substantially, and the income from multiple straw harvests may exceed that from timber sales (Roise et al. 1991). Pine straw yields from longleaf pine stands of at least 80 ft 2 /ac of basal area can be expected to exceed 2,200 lb/ ac, and at 120 ft 2 I ac of basal area, stands on the best sites can be expected to produce over 4,000 lb/ac of pine straw on a dry weight basis (Blevins et al. 1996/2005). At these levels of production, it might be possible for landowners with longleaf pine stands in good locations and with proper management to make $30 to over $150 per acre per …","PeriodicalId":51154,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Applied Forestry","volume":"36 1","pages":"130-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5849/SJAF.10-054","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Journal of Applied Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5849/SJAF.10-054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Pine straw harvesting con provide on economic benefit to landowners, but the practice may also change the composition of plant communities. This research was initiated in o 34-yeor-old stand of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.} established in 1956 to study how pine straw management practices (fertilization, prescribed fire, and straw harvesting) affected plant communities, and herein, effects on understory vegetation ore reported. A randomized complete block split-plot design was installed with two main plots: (1) no fertilization and (2) fertilization three times with different combinations of N, P, and K. There were four subplot treatments: (l) control, (2} prescribed fire, (3} prescribed fire and 2 harvests of pine straw, and (4) 13 annual harvests of pine straw. Fertilization significantly increased gross cover os o percentage of surface oreo. However, there was o general lock of understory plant response to nutrient amendments, portly because pine straw harvesting and burning were confounding fertilization effects. Prescribed fire and mechanical harvesting activities created similar understories on subplot treatments 2, 3, and 4 by significantly reducing understory woody plant stature and removing litter. Increases in understory tree and shrub stature, number of woody vines per acre, and percentage of woody plant cover significantly decreased herbaceous plant yields and percentage of cover. P ine straw, a renewable natural resource, has traditionally been harvested for mulch Qemison 1943, Bateman and Wilson 1961, Makus et al. 1994). Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) straw is considered to be one of the best sources of landscape mulch among the southern pines (Mississippi State University 2011) and can bring a higher price per bale than pine straw bales from other southern pine species (Dickens et al. 20 11). Adding pine straw to timber and forage as products of management can increase profits substantially, and the income from multiple straw harvests may exceed that from timber sales (Roise et al. 1991). Pine straw yields from longleaf pine stands of at least 80 ft 2 /ac of basal area can be expected to exceed 2,200 lb/ ac, and at 120 ft 2 I ac of basal area, stands on the best sites can be expected to produce over 4,000 lb/ac of pine straw on a dry weight basis (Blevins et al. 1996/2005). At these levels of production, it might be possible for landowners with longleaf pine stands in good locations and with proper management to make $30 to over $150 per acre per …
松木秸秆采收虽然不能给土地所有者带来经济效益,但也可能改变植物群落的组成。本研究以34年生长叶松(Pinus palustris Mill)林分为研究对象。成立于1956年,旨在研究松秸秆管理措施(施肥、规定的火和秸秆收获)如何影响植物群落,并在此报告了对林下植被的影响。采用随机完全块分割小区设计,设置2个主小区:(1)不施肥和(2)不同氮、磷、钾组合施肥3次。4个小小区处理:(1)对照,(2}规火处理,(3}规火处理,松秸秆2次采收,(4)松秸秆13次年采收。施肥显著增加了地表土壤的总覆盖面积。然而,林下植物对养分变化的响应并没有普遍锁定,这主要是由于松木秸秆的收获和焚烧混淆了施肥效应。在子样地处理2、3和4上,规定的火灾和机械采伐活动通过显著降低林下木本植物的高度和清除凋落物而创造了相似的林下植被。林下乔木和灌木高度、每英亩木本藤蔓数量和木本植物覆盖百分比的增加显著降低了草本植物产量和覆盖百分比。稻草是一种可再生的自然资源,传统上用于覆盖(Qemison 1943, Bateman and Wilson 1961, Makus et al. 1994)。长叶松(Pinus palustris Mill.)秸秆被认为是南部松树中最好的景观覆盖物来源之一(密西西比州立大学2011年),每包秸秆的价格高于其他南部松树品种的松秸秆包(Dickens et al. 2011)。将松秸秆添加到木材和饲料中作为管理产品可以大幅增加利润,多次秸秆收获的收入可能超过木材销售的收入(Roise et al. 1991)。至少80平方英尺/公顷的长叶松林的松秸秆产量预计将超过2200磅/公顷,而在120平方英尺/公顷的基础上,在最好的地点,松树秸秆的干重有望超过4000磅/公顷(Blevins et al. 1996/2005)。在这些生产水平上,长叶松林的土地所有者在良好的位置和适当的管理下,每英亩每英亩可能赚30美元到150美元以上。