{"title":"The effect of prophylactic antibiotics in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in the emergency department.","authors":"Miao Gan, Liang Zong, Xuezhong Yu, Jun Xu","doi":"10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, prophylactic antibiotics are recommended only for cirrhotic patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB); however, the benefit for other AUGIB patients remains undetermined. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between patients with AUGIB with and without prophylactic antibiotics to identify the population that requires this therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with AUGIB admitted between 1<sup>st</sup> January 2019 and 31<sup>st</sup> December 2021 in the Emergency Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled. Patients were divided into the antibiotic and non-antibiotic groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was the onset of new infection. The risk factors for mortality and infection were analyzed, and stratification analysis of prophylactic antibiotics was performed. Continuous data were analyzed using the <i>t</i>-test or nonparametric rank sum test, and categorical data were analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Indicators with significant differences between the groups were included for logistic regression analysis. A <i>P</i>-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 392 individuals were included, among them, 281 patients received prophylactic antibiotics, and 111 patients did not receive prophylactic antibiotics. The mortality rates were significantly lower in the antibiotic group than in the non-antibiotics group (6.41% vs. 17.12%, <i>P</i>=0.001). The risk factors for infection were varicose veins (<i>P</i>=0.045) and endotracheal intubation (<i>P</i>=0.005) in the prophylactic antibiotic group, and endoscopic treatment (<i>P</i>=0.010) in the non-prophylactic antibiotic group. Stratified analyses showed that patients with age ≥ 65 years, endotracheal intubation, endoscopic treatment, and AUGIB of variceal etiologies benefited from prophylactic antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AUGIB patients may benefit from prophylactic antibiotics to decrease mortality, especially those aged ≥ 65 years and those with endotracheal intubation, endoscopic treatment, and variceal etiologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science","volume":"15 1","pages":"442-447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Currently, prophylactic antibiotics are recommended only for cirrhotic patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB); however, the benefit for other AUGIB patients remains undetermined. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between patients with AUGIB with and without prophylactic antibiotics to identify the population that requires this therapy.
Methods: Patients with AUGIB admitted between 1st January 2019 and 31st December 2021 in the Emergency Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled. Patients were divided into the antibiotic and non-antibiotic groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was the onset of new infection. The risk factors for mortality and infection were analyzed, and stratification analysis of prophylactic antibiotics was performed. Continuous data were analyzed using the t-test or nonparametric rank sum test, and categorical data were analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Indicators with significant differences between the groups were included for logistic regression analysis. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: A total of 392 individuals were included, among them, 281 patients received prophylactic antibiotics, and 111 patients did not receive prophylactic antibiotics. The mortality rates were significantly lower in the antibiotic group than in the non-antibiotics group (6.41% vs. 17.12%, P=0.001). The risk factors for infection were varicose veins (P=0.045) and endotracheal intubation (P=0.005) in the prophylactic antibiotic group, and endoscopic treatment (P=0.010) in the non-prophylactic antibiotic group. Stratified analyses showed that patients with age ≥ 65 years, endotracheal intubation, endoscopic treatment, and AUGIB of variceal etiologies benefited from prophylactic antibiotics.
Conclusion: AUGIB patients may benefit from prophylactic antibiotics to decrease mortality, especially those aged ≥ 65 years and those with endotracheal intubation, endoscopic treatment, and variceal etiologies.
背景:目前,预防性抗生素仅推荐用于肝硬化急性上消化道出血(AUGIB)患者;然而,对其他AUGIB患者的益处仍不确定。我们的目的是比较使用和不使用预防性抗生素的AUGIB患者的临床结果,以确定需要这种治疗的人群。方法:选取2019年1月1日至2021年12月31日北京协和医院急诊科收治的AUGIB患者。患者分为抗生素组和非抗生素组。主要结局是住院死亡率,次要结局是新感染的发生。对死亡和感染的危险因素进行分析,并对预防性抗生素进行分层分析。连续资料分析采用t检验或非参数秩和检验,分类资料分析采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。纳入组间差异显著的指标进行logistic回归分析。结果:共纳入392例患者,其中使用预防性抗生素患者281例,未使用预防性抗生素患者111例。抗生素组的死亡率显著低于非抗生素组(6.41% vs. 17.12%, P=0.001)。感染危险因素预防性抗生素组为静脉曲张(P=0.045)和气管插管(P=0.005),非预防性抗生素组为内镜治疗(P=0.010)。分层分析显示,年龄≥65岁、气管插管、内镜治疗和静脉曲张病因的AUGIB患者受益于预防性抗生素。结论:AUGIB患者可能受益于预防性抗生素以降低死亡率,特别是年龄≥65岁、气管插管、内镜治疗和静脉曲张病因的患者。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science (ISSN 1672-3597, CN 31-1908/R) is a journal with an international scope, focusing on the popularization of traditional Chinese medicine and acupuncture- moxibustion culture, the promotion of international exchanges and the prosperity of clinical Chinese medicine and acupuncture-moxibustion. Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science mainly involves clinical practice and emphasizes the presentation of the detailed methods of observing and treating clinical common diseases on which acupuncture-moxibustion has a good effect. The articles are characterized by practicality, briefness and reproducibility. The main contents include the experiences of senior TCM doctors, forum on special diseases, clinical reports, brief reports, education series, terminology and brief introduction to new books. Communications regarding Academy activities are also appropriate.