Markup Category Terminology over the Years: a First Look

Allen H. Renear, S. DeRose
{"title":"Markup Category Terminology over the Years: a First Look","authors":"Allen H. Renear, S. DeRose","doi":"10.4242/balisagevol27.renear01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We’ve been doing the “markup” thing for more than half a century, since the beginnings of computerized text processing. In that time we’ve put a lot of adjectives in front of “markup” that reflect how we think of and apply the markup. These qualifiers have tended to fall into two categories, those that suggest what will happen, particularly in presentation, as a result of the application of markup to a string of data and those that reflect what we think about the data itself. Beginning with broad terms, like “generic” we have made many attempts to elucidate what our our markup is intended to accomplish: “conceptual”, “declarative”, “logical”, “structural”, and “semantic” have all had their times in the spotlight. What do the changing fashions in terminology say about our data and about what we, the practitioners, think about our work?","PeriodicalId":89326,"journal":{"name":"Balisage series on markup technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balisage series on markup technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4242/balisagevol27.renear01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We’ve been doing the “markup” thing for more than half a century, since the beginnings of computerized text processing. In that time we’ve put a lot of adjectives in front of “markup” that reflect how we think of and apply the markup. These qualifiers have tended to fall into two categories, those that suggest what will happen, particularly in presentation, as a result of the application of markup to a string of data and those that reflect what we think about the data itself. Beginning with broad terms, like “generic” we have made many attempts to elucidate what our our markup is intended to accomplish: “conceptual”, “declarative”, “logical”, “structural”, and “semantic” have all had their times in the spotlight. What do the changing fashions in terminology say about our data and about what we, the practitioners, think about our work?
多年来的标记类别术语:第一眼
自从计算机文本处理开始以来,我们已经做了半个多世纪的“标记”工作。在此期间,我们在“标记”前面放置了许多形容词,这些形容词反映了我们如何思考和应用标记。这些限定符倾向于分为两类,一类表明将标记应用于数据字符串后会发生什么,特别是在表示方面,另一类则反映我们对数据本身的看法。从宽泛的术语开始,比如“通用的”,我们已经做了很多尝试来阐明我们的标记想要完成什么:“概念性的”、“声明性的”、“逻辑的”、“结构的”和“语义的”都有过被关注的时候。不断变化的术语时尚对我们的数据和我们这些从业人员对我们工作的看法有什么影响?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书