Iron Determination in Deep Groundwater Wells by Anodic Stripping Voltammetry at an Iodine-Coated Platinum Electrode

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Amayreh, M. Hourani, R. Alomari, W. Hourani
{"title":"Iron Determination in Deep Groundwater Wells by Anodic Stripping Voltammetry at an Iodine-Coated Platinum Electrode","authors":"M. Amayreh, M. Hourani, R. Alomari, W. Hourani","doi":"10.4152/pea.2021390604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presented work was pivoted on iron (II) determination in deep groundwater wells samples by using anodic stripping technique at an iodine-coated platinum electrode. The developed method was based on a preconcentration step for five min., followed by the potential scanning of an iodine-coated platinum electrode between the limit of hydrogen evolution (-0.25 V) and the beginning of iodine desorption from the electrode surface (+0.85 V). The anodic peak of the deposited iron to iron (II) oxidation was clearly centered at ca. 0.74 V. The anodic peak current showed an excellent linear response (R 2 = 0.996), within an iron (II) concentration range from 1 to 100 ppm. The obtained limit of detection (LOD) was 0.26 ppm and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.85 ppm. Within the iodine-coated platinum electrode potential window the possible interferences by several ions were evaluated. The developed method was examined by iron (II) concentration determination in deep groundwater wells. The statistical comparisons between the two methods showed the absence of any significant difference between the obtained Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) values and our voltammetric method results, at P = 0.05. iron (II) determination; deep groundwater; stripping voltammetry and iodine-coated platinum electrode.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4152/pea.2021390604","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The presented work was pivoted on iron (II) determination in deep groundwater wells samples by using anodic stripping technique at an iodine-coated platinum electrode. The developed method was based on a preconcentration step for five min., followed by the potential scanning of an iodine-coated platinum electrode between the limit of hydrogen evolution (-0.25 V) and the beginning of iodine desorption from the electrode surface (+0.85 V). The anodic peak of the deposited iron to iron (II) oxidation was clearly centered at ca. 0.74 V. The anodic peak current showed an excellent linear response (R 2 = 0.996), within an iron (II) concentration range from 1 to 100 ppm. The obtained limit of detection (LOD) was 0.26 ppm and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.85 ppm. Within the iodine-coated platinum electrode potential window the possible interferences by several ions were evaluated. The developed method was examined by iron (II) concentration determination in deep groundwater wells. The statistical comparisons between the two methods showed the absence of any significant difference between the obtained Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) values and our voltammetric method results, at P = 0.05. iron (II) determination; deep groundwater; stripping voltammetry and iodine-coated platinum electrode.
碘包覆铂电极阳极溶出伏安法测定深水井中的铁
本文研究了在碘包覆铂电极上阳极溶出法测定深水井样品中的铁(II)。该方法先进行5 min的预富集,然后对镀碘铂电极在析氢极限(-0.25 V)和电极表面碘解吸开始(+0.85 V)之间进行电位扫描,沉积的铁到铁(II)氧化的阳极峰明显集中在约0.74 V处。在铁(II)浓度为1 ~ 100 ppm范围内,阳极峰值电流表现出良好的线性响应(r2 = 0.996)。所得样品的检出限为0.26 ppm,定量限为0.85 ppm。在碘包覆铂电极电位窗口内,对几种离子可能的干扰进行了评价。用深水井铁(II)浓度测定对所建立的方法进行了验证。两种方法之间的统计比较表明,电感耦合等离子体光学发射光谱(ICP-OES)值与伏安法结果之间没有显著差异,P = 0.05。铁(II)测定;深层地下水;溶出伏安法与碘包覆铂电极。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信