Comparative Psychology and the Objectification of Mind: Thorndike's Cats in the Puzzle-Box

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
David Clarke
{"title":"Comparative Psychology and the Objectification of Mind: Thorndike's Cats in the Puzzle-Box","authors":"David Clarke","doi":"10.5093/rhp2019a15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolAnimal Intelligence: An Experimental Study of the Associative Process in Animals de E. L. Thorndike supuso una significativa contribucion a la Psicologia del siglo XX. En los manuals el texto se atribuye a Thorndike, sin marores precisiones. El diseno parece simple y convincente: por ensayo y error los gatos aprenden a escapar de una caja-problema. Sin embargo, un examen detenido revela multiples controles, innovaciones estadisticas y una fuerte interpretacion teorica. Esta sofisticacion plantea algunas cuestiones: ?realizo un joven estudiante de postgrado este complejo experimento? ?por que se financio este costoso experimento? ?se ha tornado lo convencional en un mito? Este articulo profundiza en la compleja relacion entre el proyecto funcionalista de James, el de los tests mentales de Cattel y la psicologia comparada de Morgan y Romanes, para concluir que el experimento de Thorndike fue el medio necesario para dotar al funcionalismo de un experimento fundacional y consagrar la curva del aprendizaje como el metodo de esta perspectiva cientifica EnglishAnimal Intelligence: An Experimental Study of the Associative Process in Animals by Edward L. Thorndike contributed significantly to psychology in the 20th century. In textbooks, the experiment is attributed to Thorndike without qualification. The design looks simple and produces conviction; by trial and error, cats learn to escape from a puzzle-box. But closer reading reveals multiple controls, innovation in statistical methods, and strong theoretical interpretation. This sophistication raises questions: Did a young graduate student do this complicated experiment? Why was this expensive study funded? Is the convention now myth? This paper delves into the complex relationship between James’s functionalist project, Cattell’s mental testing and the comparative psychology of Morgan and Romanes, to conclude that Thorndike’s experiment was the means to provide functionalism with a foundational experiment and consecrate the learning curve as the method of this scientific perspective.","PeriodicalId":82492,"journal":{"name":"Revista de historia de la psicologia","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de historia de la psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/rhp2019a15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

espanolAnimal Intelligence: An Experimental Study of the Associative Process in Animals de E. L. Thorndike supuso una significativa contribucion a la Psicologia del siglo XX. En los manuals el texto se atribuye a Thorndike, sin marores precisiones. El diseno parece simple y convincente: por ensayo y error los gatos aprenden a escapar de una caja-problema. Sin embargo, un examen detenido revela multiples controles, innovaciones estadisticas y una fuerte interpretacion teorica. Esta sofisticacion plantea algunas cuestiones: ?realizo un joven estudiante de postgrado este complejo experimento? ?por que se financio este costoso experimento? ?se ha tornado lo convencional en un mito? Este articulo profundiza en la compleja relacion entre el proyecto funcionalista de James, el de los tests mentales de Cattel y la psicologia comparada de Morgan y Romanes, para concluir que el experimento de Thorndike fue el medio necesario para dotar al funcionalismo de un experimento fundacional y consagrar la curva del aprendizaje como el metodo de esta perspectiva cientifica EnglishAnimal Intelligence: An Experimental Study of the Associative Process in Animals by Edward L. Thorndike contributed significantly to psychology in the 20th century. In textbooks, the experiment is attributed to Thorndike without qualification. The design looks simple and produces conviction; by trial and error, cats learn to escape from a puzzle-box. But closer reading reveals multiple controls, innovation in statistical methods, and strong theoretical interpretation. This sophistication raises questions: Did a young graduate student do this complicated experiment? Why was this expensive study funded? Is the convention now myth? This paper delves into the complex relationship between James’s functionalist project, Cattell’s mental testing and the comparative psychology of Morgan and Romanes, to conclude that Thorndike’s experiment was the means to provide functionalism with a foundational experiment and consecrate the learning curve as the method of this scientific perspective.
比较心理学与心灵的客观化:桑代克的《谜盒中的猫》
E. L.桑代克的《西班牙动物智力:动物联想过程的实验研究》对20世纪心理学做出了重大贡献。在《手册》中,文本被认为是桑代克的作品,但没有太多的细节。这个设计看起来简单而令人信服:通过反复试验,猫学会了如何逃离问题箱。然而,仔细检查就会发现多重控制、统计创新和强有力的理论解释。这种复杂性提出了一些问题:我是否对一个年轻的研究生进行了这个复杂的实验?为什么要资助这个昂贵的实验?传统已经变成了神话吗?这篇之间复杂关系的深化,詹姆斯funcionalista,项目Cattel心理测试和非常的精神病患者对摩根和Romanes相比,最后实验所需的桑代克是一个实验基础功能和提供投入的学习曲线等方法这种观点cientifica EnglishAnimal Intelligence:= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的面积为,其中土地面积为,其中土地面积为。In教科书,the experiment is attributed to桑代克without qualification)。设计看起来简单,产生信念;= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的总面积为,其中土地和(0.984平方公里)水。然而,更深入的阅读揭示了多元控制、统计方法的创新和强大的理论解释。这个复杂先生raises:没有a young graduate学生do This complicated实验?为什么资助这项昂贵的研究?现在的惯例是神话吗?This paper delves into the complex relationship between詹姆斯s functionalist project, Cattell s心理检测和摩根的比较心理学和Romanes所桑代克' s was the means to experiment提供functionalism with a foundational experiment and consecrate the learning curve as the method of This scientific perspective。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信