Pruning Wastes From Fruit Trees as a Substrate for Pleurotus ostreatus

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Acta Mycologica Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5586/am.568
A. Landínez-Torres, Carmenza Pérez Fagua, Angie Coraima Sanabria López, Yuli Alexandra Deaquiz Oyola, C. Girometta
{"title":"Pruning Wastes From Fruit Trees as a Substrate for Pleurotus ostreatus","authors":"A. Landínez-Torres, Carmenza Pérez Fagua, Angie Coraima Sanabria López, Yuli Alexandra Deaquiz Oyola, C. Girometta","doi":"10.5586/am.568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plant material obtained by pruning and production of deciduous fruit trees was evaluated as substrates for the production of the oyster mushroom, Pleurotus ostreatus . Lignified branches and stems from peach, apple, and pear trees were processed using a ripping machine to reduce the size of chips and to optimize disinfection. A completely randomized experimental design was proposed with six treatments (novel substrates) and one absolute control (100% hay substrate). Morphological variables such as thickness and diameter of the pileus, stipe length were assessed, as well as production variables (sprouting, fresh weight, and biological efficiency) and bromatological analysis (ash, ethereal extract, crude fiber, and crude protein). Apart from the 100%-hay substrate, biological efficiency ranged between 27% (100% apple tree as the substrate) and 140% (50% hay + 50% peach tree as the substrate). According to morphological analysis, the highest diameters were recorded from mixed substrates (50% hay + 50% wood), and a highly significant positive correlation was found between diameter and stipe length. Morphological parameters were not significantly correlated with biological efficiency. Analysis of biological efficiency confirmed that mixed substrates clustered together with 100%-wood substrates. Bromatological analysis showed that the mixed substrate (50% hay + 50% pear tree) had the highest protein content among the novel tested substrates. Bromatological parameters were not significantly correlated with biological efficiency. In conclusion, pruning residues from fruit trees can be valuable by using them as substrates for the cultivation of P. ostreatus . Production is quantitatively competitive with that using hay, on the condition that wood is mixed with hay.","PeriodicalId":37880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Mycologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Mycologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5586/am.568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Plant material obtained by pruning and production of deciduous fruit trees was evaluated as substrates for the production of the oyster mushroom, Pleurotus ostreatus . Lignified branches and stems from peach, apple, and pear trees were processed using a ripping machine to reduce the size of chips and to optimize disinfection. A completely randomized experimental design was proposed with six treatments (novel substrates) and one absolute control (100% hay substrate). Morphological variables such as thickness and diameter of the pileus, stipe length were assessed, as well as production variables (sprouting, fresh weight, and biological efficiency) and bromatological analysis (ash, ethereal extract, crude fiber, and crude protein). Apart from the 100%-hay substrate, biological efficiency ranged between 27% (100% apple tree as the substrate) and 140% (50% hay + 50% peach tree as the substrate). According to morphological analysis, the highest diameters were recorded from mixed substrates (50% hay + 50% wood), and a highly significant positive correlation was found between diameter and stipe length. Morphological parameters were not significantly correlated with biological efficiency. Analysis of biological efficiency confirmed that mixed substrates clustered together with 100%-wood substrates. Bromatological analysis showed that the mixed substrate (50% hay + 50% pear tree) had the highest protein content among the novel tested substrates. Bromatological parameters were not significantly correlated with biological efficiency. In conclusion, pruning residues from fruit trees can be valuable by using them as substrates for the cultivation of P. ostreatus . Production is quantitatively competitive with that using hay, on the condition that wood is mixed with hay.
果树修剪废弃物作为平菇基质的研究
通过对落叶果树的修剪和生产获得的植物材料作为生产平菇(Pleurotus ostreatus)的基质进行评价。桃树、苹果树和梨树的木质素枝和茎使用撕皮机进行处理,以减少碎片的大小并优化消毒。采用完全随机试验设计,6个处理(新型基质)和1个绝对对照(100%干草基质)。形态学变量,如菌毛的厚度和直径,柄长进行了评估,以及生产变量(发芽,鲜重和生物效率)和色谱分析(灰分,空灵提取物,粗纤维和粗蛋白质)。除100%干草基质外,生物效率在27%(100%苹果树为基质)和140%(50%干草+ 50%桃树为基质)之间。形态分析表明,50%干草+ 50%木材混合基质下的茎杆直径最大,且茎杆直径与茎杆长度呈极显著正相关。形态参数与生物效率无显著相关。生物效率分析证实混合底物与100%木材底物聚集在一起。色谱分析表明,混合基质(50%干草+ 50%梨树)的蛋白质含量最高。色谱参数与生物效率无显著相关。综上所述,果树修剪残余物可作为栽培青霉的基质,具有一定的应用价值。在木材与干草混合的条件下,产量与使用干草的产量在数量上具有竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Mycologica
Acta Mycologica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Mycologica is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles and short communications in all areas of mycology, including fungus-like organisms (slime moulds, yeasts, lichens, oomycetes, etc.), with respect to various ecosystems. Specifically, the journal covers: ecology, taxonomy, conservation, and systematics of fungi, fungal physiology, biochemistry, molecular genetics, fungus–plant (pathogens, mycorrhizas, endophytes), fungus–animal, and fungus–microbe interactions applied aspects of mycology in forestry, agriculture, and biotechnology. Reviews of books related to mycology and in memoriam are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信