Joe Biden’s conflict communication discourse with Vladimir Putin: the Geneva case (2021)

IF 0.7 Q2 AREA STUDIES

Eastern Journal of European Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.47743/ejes-2021-0212

Vilma Linkevičiūtė

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research into Joe Biden’s conflict communication discourse with Vladimir Putin is relevant for international geopolitics because it may be identified as a geopolitical conflict. The results of conflict resolution will have a crucial impact, not only on the main parties to the conflict, but also on the security of the EU. Thus, the object of this article is Biden’s conflict communication discourse aimed at Putin (2021). The aim of the research is to identify and analyse how conflict communication is manifested in the discourse of two political leaders. Conflict communication enables Biden to attribute positive nominations to himself, as a politician, to the USA and the allies. Putin and his supporters are granted negative nominations and are accused of detrimental actions. The role and functions of contrastive nominations in Biden’s conflict communication discourse are aimed to form the intended positive image of Biden and the negative image of Putin.

查看原文本刊更多论文

乔·拜登与弗拉基米尔·普京的冲突沟通话语:日内瓦案例(2021)

对拜登与普京的冲突沟通话语的研究与国际地缘政治相关，因为它可能被确定为地缘政治冲突。冲突解决的结果将产生至关重要的影响，不仅对冲突的主要当事方，而且对欧盟的安全。因此，本文的研究对象是拜登针对普京(2021)的冲突传播话语。本研究的目的是识别和分析冲突传播是如何在两位政治领导人的话语中表现出来的。冲突沟通使拜登能够将积极提名归功于作为政治家的自己，以及美国和盟国。普京和他的支持者获得了负面提名，并被指控采取了有害的行动。对比提名在拜登冲突传播话语中的作用和功能旨在形成拜登有意的正面形象和普京的负面形象。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Eastern Journal of European Studies AREA STUDIES-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

16.70%

发文量

审稿时长

10 weeks

期刊介绍： The Eastern Journal of European Studies (EJES) seeks to provide a forum for multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary dialogue between ideas, and a framework for theoretical and empirical analyses covering major topics in European studies: European history, politics, European economy and European policies, EU community law, European culture and society. EJES encourages studies focusing on Central and Eastern Europe (including Eastern Neighbourhood) in order to better understand its transformations induced by the integration process and to address its specific challenges by supporting scientific debates on the general European theory and practice. Furthermore, the editorial board regularly invites distinguished guest editors to coordinate thematic issues.