Clinicopathological Correlation in Dry Eye Disease

S. Singh, R. Oli, M. Srivastava, Deepika Singh, Jagdish Dukre
{"title":"Clinicopathological Correlation in Dry Eye Disease","authors":"S. Singh, R. Oli, M. Srivastava, Deepika Singh, Jagdish Dukre","doi":"10.4172/2324-8599.1000189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To establish the strength of the association between routine tear function tests and conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) and to determine whether they simulate the morphological and cytological changes that occur on the ocular surface in dry eye. \nMaterials and Methods: Fifty six patients (30 cases and 26 controls) were included in the study. The tear film profile included tear film break up time (TBUT), Schirmer’s-1, Rose Bengal scores (RBS), and impression cytology. CIC samples were obtained from the infero-temporal quadrant of bulbar conjunctiva and stained with Papanicolaou stain (PAP) and Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) stains. \nResults: In our study, among clinical tests RBS (86.7%) had maximum sensitivity and highest percentage of specificity of TBUT (88.5%). Predictive values of Schirmer’s test, RBS, GCD, TBUT and CIC was 77.8%, 83.9%, 87.9%, 88.9% and 93.8% respectively in our study group. Cytological findings correlated well with histological findings. \nConclusion: Impression cytology was found to be better when compared to clinical tests. These etiopathological findings will help to decide proper line of management.","PeriodicalId":89944,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ophthalmic Pathology","volume":"2016 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ophthalmic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-8599.1000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To establish the strength of the association between routine tear function tests and conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) and to determine whether they simulate the morphological and cytological changes that occur on the ocular surface in dry eye. Materials and Methods: Fifty six patients (30 cases and 26 controls) were included in the study. The tear film profile included tear film break up time (TBUT), Schirmer’s-1, Rose Bengal scores (RBS), and impression cytology. CIC samples were obtained from the infero-temporal quadrant of bulbar conjunctiva and stained with Papanicolaou stain (PAP) and Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) stains. Results: In our study, among clinical tests RBS (86.7%) had maximum sensitivity and highest percentage of specificity of TBUT (88.5%). Predictive values of Schirmer’s test, RBS, GCD, TBUT and CIC was 77.8%, 83.9%, 87.9%, 88.9% and 93.8% respectively in our study group. Cytological findings correlated well with histological findings. Conclusion: Impression cytology was found to be better when compared to clinical tests. These etiopathological findings will help to decide proper line of management.
干眼病的临床病理相关性
目的:建立常规泪液功能测试与结膜印象细胞学(CIC)之间的关联强度,并确定它们是否模拟干眼时眼表发生的形态学和细胞学变化。材料与方法:56例患者(30例,对照组26例)纳入研究。泪膜特征包括泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)、Schirmer 's-1、Rose Bengal评分(RBS)和印象细胞学。从球结膜颞下象限取CIC标本,用Papanicolaou染色(PAP)和周期性酸性希夫染色(PAS)进行染色。结果:在我们的研究中,临床检测中,RBS(86.7%)对TBUT的敏感性最高,特异性最高(88.5%)。研究组Schirmer’s test、RBS、GCD、TBUT、CIC的预测值分别为77.8%、83.9%、87.9%、88.9%、93.8%。细胞学结果与组织学结果有良好的相关性。结论:印象细胞学检查优于临床检查。这些病因病理学结果将有助于确定适当的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信