Persistence among Deep Rural Communities in the Northern Plains, Revisited

A. Anderson, George Langelett, Gary Aguiar, B. Shuler, Meredith Redlin
{"title":"Persistence among Deep Rural Communities in the Northern Plains, Revisited","authors":"A. Anderson, George Langelett, Gary Aguiar, B. Shuler, Meredith Redlin","doi":"10.4148/1936-0487.1064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research note revisits the question of rural persistence, which was first brought to light in this journal by Redlin et al. (2010) 1 . We follow Redlin et al’s example by employing county-level data and seek to identify small towns that are surviving to explain their persistence. Our effort to replicate their results begins with the collection of the data anew, but we also include two additional states and incorporate a time dimension. By using Census data from 2000 only, Redlin et al. applied a static approach to test their hypothesis. In this study, we collect data from 1990 as well as 2000 to explore the time dimension of rural persistence. Our findings indicate that rural persistence is a dynamic rather than a static process. First, human capital systematically affects rural persistence. Second, changes in human capital affect rural persistence much more significantly than a stock of each measure at an earlier point in time. This result is encouraging; it suggests that no matter a community’s starting point in human capital, efforts towards community survival can be successful. Increases in any of our independent variables affect small town persistence more than the initial stock of any of them. Moreover, our results produce differences among the states, specifically Montana and Wyoming from the Dakotas, which indicate that future research efforts in rural persistence","PeriodicalId":91938,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of rural research and policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online journal of rural research and policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/1936-0487.1064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research note revisits the question of rural persistence, which was first brought to light in this journal by Redlin et al. (2010) 1 . We follow Redlin et al’s example by employing county-level data and seek to identify small towns that are surviving to explain their persistence. Our effort to replicate their results begins with the collection of the data anew, but we also include two additional states and incorporate a time dimension. By using Census data from 2000 only, Redlin et al. applied a static approach to test their hypothesis. In this study, we collect data from 1990 as well as 2000 to explore the time dimension of rural persistence. Our findings indicate that rural persistence is a dynamic rather than a static process. First, human capital systematically affects rural persistence. Second, changes in human capital affect rural persistence much more significantly than a stock of each measure at an earlier point in time. This result is encouraging; it suggests that no matter a community’s starting point in human capital, efforts towards community survival can be successful. Increases in any of our independent variables affect small town persistence more than the initial stock of any of them. Moreover, our results produce differences among the states, specifically Montana and Wyoming from the Dakotas, which indicate that future research efforts in rural persistence
北方平原农村深层社区的持久性,再访
这篇研究报告重新审视了农村持久性的问题,这个问题最初是由Redlin等人(2010)在本刊上提出的。我们遵循Redlin等人的例子,采用县级数据,并试图找出幸存下来的小城镇,以解释它们的持久性。我们复制他们的结果的努力从重新收集数据开始,但我们也包括两个额外的状态,并纳入一个时间维度。Redlin等人仅使用2000年的人口普查数据,采用静态方法来检验他们的假设。本研究以1990年和2000年的数据为样本,探讨了农村持久性的时间维度。我们的研究结果表明,农村的持久性是一个动态的而不是静态的过程。首先,人力资本系统性地影响农村持久性。其次,人力资本的变化对农村持久性的影响要比以往每项指标的存量显著得多。这个结果令人鼓舞;这表明,无论一个社区的人力资本起点如何,社区生存的努力都可能取得成功。任何自变量的增加对小镇持久性的影响都大于它们的初始存量。此外,我们的结果在各州之间产生了差异,特别是蒙大拿州和怀俄明州与达科他州之间的差异,这表明未来在农村持久性方面的研究工作
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信