Current status of robotic colorectal surgery in Australasia: A questionnaire survey of consultant members of the colorectal surgical society of Australia and New Zealand

K. Buxey, F. Lam, G. Newstead
{"title":"Current status of robotic colorectal surgery in Australasia: A questionnaire survey of consultant members of the colorectal surgical society of Australia and New Zealand","authors":"K. Buxey, F. Lam, G. Newstead","doi":"10.4103/WJCS.WJCS_38_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There has been considerable interest worldwide in the application of a robotic operating platform in the practice of colorectal surgery. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the current uptake of robotic colorectal surgery in Australia and New Zealand. Design: Survey data were obtained from the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ) registry of all specialist colorectal surgeons in Australia and New Zealand. Setting: Specialist colorectal surgeons responded to the survey through e-mail contact via an official e-mail from the CSSANZ. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to members of the CSSANZ regarding their current robotic surgical practice. Main Outcome Measures: Volume of and nature of robotic surgery being currently undertaken in Australia and New Zealand, with an emphasis on seeking to understand the surgeon and patient factors that would promote robotic practice and also any factors or barriers in the implementation of robotic colorectal surgery being performed. Sample Size: The sample size was 77. Results: Seventy-seven replies were received from a total of 227 surveys. The response rate is similar to other comparable surveys published when the laparoscopic colorectal era was introduced. Most surgeons performed minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery; however, only 29% performed any robotic surgery and 50% of these performed < 5 cases in the preceding 12 months. Low rectal cancer and rectopexy surgeries were the most frequently performed robotic operations. About 48% of surgeons believed that the robotic platform offers specific patient benefits, and 75% believed that it offers specific benefits to the surgeon. The main reason for consultants not performing robotic procedures was largely related to cost, with training also cited as a barrier. Conclusion: Robotic colorectal surgery is being performed by 29% of colorectal consultants in Australasia, although only a minority of these surgeons have a substantial volume. In the future, a substantial reduction in costs is envisaged, as more companies enter the robotic surgery marketplace and competition drives reduction in costs. This in many ways mirrors the introduction of laparoscopy and we believe as cost comes down, training pathways need to be established to train the next generation of colorectal surgeons robotically. Limitations: Our study is limited by inherent limitations of survey data and the response rate.","PeriodicalId":90396,"journal":{"name":"World journal of colorectal surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of colorectal surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/WJCS.WJCS_38_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There has been considerable interest worldwide in the application of a robotic operating platform in the practice of colorectal surgery. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the current uptake of robotic colorectal surgery in Australia and New Zealand. Design: Survey data were obtained from the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ) registry of all specialist colorectal surgeons in Australia and New Zealand. Setting: Specialist colorectal surgeons responded to the survey through e-mail contact via an official e-mail from the CSSANZ. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to members of the CSSANZ regarding their current robotic surgical practice. Main Outcome Measures: Volume of and nature of robotic surgery being currently undertaken in Australia and New Zealand, with an emphasis on seeking to understand the surgeon and patient factors that would promote robotic practice and also any factors or barriers in the implementation of robotic colorectal surgery being performed. Sample Size: The sample size was 77. Results: Seventy-seven replies were received from a total of 227 surveys. The response rate is similar to other comparable surveys published when the laparoscopic colorectal era was introduced. Most surgeons performed minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery; however, only 29% performed any robotic surgery and 50% of these performed < 5 cases in the preceding 12 months. Low rectal cancer and rectopexy surgeries were the most frequently performed robotic operations. About 48% of surgeons believed that the robotic platform offers specific patient benefits, and 75% believed that it offers specific benefits to the surgeon. The main reason for consultants not performing robotic procedures was largely related to cost, with training also cited as a barrier. Conclusion: Robotic colorectal surgery is being performed by 29% of colorectal consultants in Australasia, although only a minority of these surgeons have a substantial volume. In the future, a substantial reduction in costs is envisaged, as more companies enter the robotic surgery marketplace and competition drives reduction in costs. This in many ways mirrors the introduction of laparoscopy and we believe as cost comes down, training pathways need to be established to train the next generation of colorectal surgeons robotically. Limitations: Our study is limited by inherent limitations of survey data and the response rate.
大洋洲机器人结直肠手术的现状:对澳大利亚和新西兰结直肠外科学会顾问成员的问卷调查
背景:在世界范围内,机器人手术平台在结直肠手术实践中的应用已经引起了相当大的兴趣。目的:本研究的目的是评估目前机器人结肠直肠手术在澳大利亚和新西兰的应用情况。设计:调查数据来自澳大利亚和新西兰结直肠外科学会(CSSANZ)登记的澳大利亚和新西兰所有专业结直肠外科医生。背景:结直肠外科专家通过CSSANZ的官方电子邮件通过电子邮件联系回应了调查。材料和方法:向CSSANZ成员分发了一份关于他们目前机器人手术实践的问卷。主要结果测量:目前在澳大利亚和新西兰进行的机器人手术的数量和性质,重点是了解外科医生和患者的因素,这些因素会促进机器人的实践,以及正在进行的机器人结肠直肠手术实施中的任何因素或障碍。样本量:样本量为77。结果:共收到227项调查的77份答复。回复率与引入腹腔镜结直肠时代时发表的其他可比调查相似。大多数外科医生进行微创(腹腔镜)手术;然而,在过去的12个月里,只有29%的患者进行了机器人手术,其中50%的患者进行了< 5例手术。低位直肠癌和直肠固定术是机器人手术中最常见的手术。大约48%的外科医生认为机器人平台为患者提供了特定的好处,75%的人认为它为外科医生提供了特定的好处。咨询师不进行机器人手术的主要原因主要与成本有关,培训也是一个障碍。结论:在澳大拉西亚,29%的结直肠外科医生使用机器人进行结直肠手术,尽管这些外科医生中只有少数拥有可观的数量。在未来,随着越来越多的公司进入机器人手术市场,以及竞争推动成本的降低,预计成本将大幅降低。这在很多方面反映了腹腔镜的引入,我们相信随着成本的降低,需要建立培训途径来培训下一代的机器人结肠直肠外科医生。局限性:我们的研究受到调查数据和回复率的固有局限性的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信