Free Market Revolution: Partial or Complete?

Q1 Arts and Humanities

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.5325/jaynrandstud.20.2.0340

C. Sciabarra

引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:This review of Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government, by Yaron Brook and Don Watkins, lauds its virtues, while criticizing its tendencies toward a partial and one-sided understanding of the nature of the revolution it extols. In bracketing out a deeper analysis of the role of business in the creation of modern corporatist political economy and the debilitating effects of war and the national security state on markets at home and abroad, the authors ultimately fail to provide the more robust defense of freedom that Rand's project implies.

查看原文本刊更多论文

自由市场革命:部分还是完全?

本文对亚伦·布鲁克和唐·沃特金斯所著的《自由市场革命:安·兰德的思想如何终结大政府》一书进行了回顾，赞扬了它的优点，同时批评了它对它所颂扬的革命本质的片面理解的倾向。在对企业在现代社团主义政治经济学的创立中所扮演的角色以及战争和国家安全状态对国内外市场的削弱作用进行更深入的分析时，作者最终未能提供兰德项目所暗示的更有力的自由辩护。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation has entered into an electronic licensing relationship with EBSCO Publishing, the world"s most prolific aggregator of full-text journals, magazines, and other sources. The full text of The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies can be found on EBSCO Publishing"s databases. A nonpartisan journal devoted to the study of Ayn Rand and her times. The journal is not aligned with any advocacy group, institute, or person. It welcomes papers from every discipline and from a variety of interpretive and critical perspectives. It aims to foster scholarly dialogue through a respectful exchange of ideas. The journal is published semi-annually, in the fall and the spring.