Reimagining Community Engagement Sustainability: Insights for the Postpandemic World

D. Kennedy, Kara Adams, Dan Bustillos, S. Carlisle, Mabel C Ezeonwu, Deborah A. Hathaway, G. Lasker, A. Shinneman
{"title":"Reimagining Community Engagement Sustainability: Insights for the Postpandemic World","authors":"D. Kennedy, Kara Adams, Dan Bustillos, S. Carlisle, Mabel C Ezeonwu, Deborah A. Hathaway, G. Lasker, A. Shinneman","doi":"10.54656/jces.v14i2.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars in the community engagement field have long discussed measures to sustain community engagement on campus. When COVID-19 emerged, however, university operations, including community-engaged teaching and research, had to pivot. The conversation was no longer about sustaining community engagement but about enduring the pandemic for the sake of students, faculty, and community. In order to inform a more durable community engagement strategy for the postpandemic world, we apply a sensemaking approach for the purpose of organizational learning. We collected quantitative data about 40 planned courses and surveyed 22 community-engaged faculty from April to August 2020 (spring–summer academic quarters). In the same period, we gathered qualitative data from 41 respondents comprising 28 faculty and 13 community partners. The quantitative analysis suggested that, overall, faculty maintained a positive outlook regarding the strategies they used to address the needs of students and community partners and regarding their own expectations and innovations. The qualitative data revealed seven themes—loss and challenge, future uncertainty, action strategies, communication strategies, technology, collaborative resilience, and student considerations—that can help us consider community engagement through the lenses of experience, adaptation, and sustainability. The insights provided here offer ways to improve durability within sustainable community engagement practices.","PeriodicalId":73680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community engagement and scholarship","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community engagement and scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54656/jces.v14i2.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars in the community engagement field have long discussed measures to sustain community engagement on campus. When COVID-19 emerged, however, university operations, including community-engaged teaching and research, had to pivot. The conversation was no longer about sustaining community engagement but about enduring the pandemic for the sake of students, faculty, and community. In order to inform a more durable community engagement strategy for the postpandemic world, we apply a sensemaking approach for the purpose of organizational learning. We collected quantitative data about 40 planned courses and surveyed 22 community-engaged faculty from April to August 2020 (spring–summer academic quarters). In the same period, we gathered qualitative data from 41 respondents comprising 28 faculty and 13 community partners. The quantitative analysis suggested that, overall, faculty maintained a positive outlook regarding the strategies they used to address the needs of students and community partners and regarding their own expectations and innovations. The qualitative data revealed seven themes—loss and challenge, future uncertainty, action strategies, communication strategies, technology, collaborative resilience, and student considerations—that can help us consider community engagement through the lenses of experience, adaptation, and sustainability. The insights provided here offer ways to improve durability within sustainable community engagement practices.
重新构想社区参与的可持续性:对大流行后世界的见解
长期以来,社区参与领域的学者们一直在讨论维持校园社区参与的措施。然而,当COVID-19出现时,大学业务,包括社区参与的教学和研究,不得不转向。对话不再是关于维持社区参与,而是为了学生、教师和社区的利益而忍受疫情。为了为大流行后的世界提供更持久的社区参与战略,我们采用了一种意义构建方法,用于组织学习。我们从2020年4月至8月(春夏学期)收集了40门计划课程的定量数据,并对22名社区参与的教师进行了调查。在同一时期,我们收集了41名受访者的定性数据,其中包括28名教师和13名社区合作伙伴。定量分析表明,总体而言,教师对他们用于满足学生和社区合作伙伴需求的策略以及他们自己的期望和创新保持积极的态度。定性数据揭示了七个主题——损失和挑战、未来的不确定性、行动策略、沟通策略、技术、协作弹性和学生考虑——可以帮助我们通过经验、适应和可持续性的视角来考虑社区参与。这里提供的见解提供了在可持续社区参与实践中提高持久性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信