{"title":"Single-step versus stepwise dilatation technique in percutaneous nephrolithotomy","authors":"Batool Attallah, Majed Mohammad","doi":"10.5455/rmj.20230311075832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare single-step dilatation technique with the stepwise (serial) dilatation technique in order to create a nephrostomy tract during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methodology: This comparative interventional single-center study was conducted from May 2020 to November 2021 at Basra Teaching Hospital, Iraq. Fifty patients in group A underwent the single-step dilatation and 70 patients in group B were subjected to the stepwise dilatation technique in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. We recorded number of punctures, operation time, complications and success. Results: There were no significant statistical differences in both groups regarding success rate, hospital stay, intra and postoperative complications, and bleeding that required blood transfusion. The stepwise dilatation technique had a considerably longer mean dilatation time than the single-step method did. The single-step dilatation technique had a much shorter mean radiation exposure a shorter mean total operating time than the stepwise strategy. Conclusion: The construction and dilatation of a percutaneous nephrolithotomy nephrostomy tract can be successfully carried out using a single-step dilatation procedure, which requires less radiation exposure, less time during surgery, and shorter dilatation time.","PeriodicalId":20844,"journal":{"name":"Rawal Medical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rawal Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/rmj.20230311075832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare single-step dilatation technique with the stepwise (serial) dilatation technique in order to create a nephrostomy tract during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methodology: This comparative interventional single-center study was conducted from May 2020 to November 2021 at Basra Teaching Hospital, Iraq. Fifty patients in group A underwent the single-step dilatation and 70 patients in group B were subjected to the stepwise dilatation technique in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. We recorded number of punctures, operation time, complications and success. Results: There were no significant statistical differences in both groups regarding success rate, hospital stay, intra and postoperative complications, and bleeding that required blood transfusion. The stepwise dilatation technique had a considerably longer mean dilatation time than the single-step method did. The single-step dilatation technique had a much shorter mean radiation exposure a shorter mean total operating time than the stepwise strategy. Conclusion: The construction and dilatation of a percutaneous nephrolithotomy nephrostomy tract can be successfully carried out using a single-step dilatation procedure, which requires less radiation exposure, less time during surgery, and shorter dilatation time.
期刊介绍:
RMJ is a general Medicine publication and accepts oorigial articles, editorials, case reports and commentaries. It aims to dessiminate medical knowldge to professional community.