Is there a Difference between Knee Valgus Angles on Landing during Different Hop Tasks

Waleed K. Alshemimary, L. Herrington
{"title":"Is there a Difference between Knee Valgus Angles on Landing during Different Hop Tasks","authors":"Waleed K. Alshemimary, L. Herrington","doi":"10.4172/2167-7921.1000210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: A brief review of the literature to provide an overview of knee valgus angles during different hop tasks. \nMethods: A literature search was conducted; electronic databases used included PubMed, and SCOPUS. The inclusion criteria were English language, and publication between January 2010 and May 2015, which assessed the knee valgus angles during hop landings. The studies were evaluated by the researcher through their titles, abstract, as well as how the investigation functioned according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the present study. \nResults: A total of 2 papers were included with full-text, as various studies incorporated designs for knee valgus testing which resulted in alternate findings that could not be analysed or evaluated. \nConclusion: No extensive research has been carried out over the past 5 years to evaluate knee valgus angles during hop tests. However, the current study found that the majority of the published studies during 2010 – May 2015 focused on evaluating the performance of landing tasks among participants in different sports (basketball, volleyball). Moreover, it can be concluded from the present review that there still exists failings in the evaluative results from past studies regarding the definitive comparisons between knee valgus angles upon landing, which occur through the measurement of important variables in the utilisation of 2D video analysis (i.e. when using crossover hop tests to measure knee valgus angles).","PeriodicalId":91304,"journal":{"name":"Journal of arthritis","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of arthritis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-7921.1000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A brief review of the literature to provide an overview of knee valgus angles during different hop tasks. Methods: A literature search was conducted; electronic databases used included PubMed, and SCOPUS. The inclusion criteria were English language, and publication between January 2010 and May 2015, which assessed the knee valgus angles during hop landings. The studies were evaluated by the researcher through their titles, abstract, as well as how the investigation functioned according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the present study. Results: A total of 2 papers were included with full-text, as various studies incorporated designs for knee valgus testing which resulted in alternate findings that could not be analysed or evaluated. Conclusion: No extensive research has been carried out over the past 5 years to evaluate knee valgus angles during hop tests. However, the current study found that the majority of the published studies during 2010 – May 2015 focused on evaluating the performance of landing tasks among participants in different sports (basketball, volleyball). Moreover, it can be concluded from the present review that there still exists failings in the evaluative results from past studies regarding the definitive comparisons between knee valgus angles upon landing, which occur through the measurement of important variables in the utilisation of 2D video analysis (i.e. when using crossover hop tests to measure knee valgus angles).
在不同的跳跃任务中,膝关节外翻角度是否有差异
目的:简要回顾文献,提供不同跳跃任务时膝关节外翻角度的概述。方法:进行文献检索;使用的电子数据库包括PubMed和SCOPUS。纳入标准为英语,并在2010年1月至2015年5月之间发表,评估跳跃着陆时膝关节外翻角度。研究人员通过研究的标题、摘要以及根据本研究的纳入/排除标准调查如何进行评估。结果:共有2篇论文纳入全文,因为各种研究纳入了膝关节外翻测试的设计,导致无法分析或评估的替代结果。结论:在过去的5年中,没有广泛的研究在跳跃试验中评估膝关节外翻角。然而,目前的研究发现,2010年至2015年5月期间发表的大多数研究都集中在评估不同运动(篮球、排球)参与者的着陆任务表现上。此外,从本综述中可以得出结论,在过去的研究中,关于着陆时膝关节外翻角的明确比较的评估结果仍然存在缺陷,这是通过使用二维视频分析(即使用交叉跳跃测试来测量膝关节外翻角)中测量重要变量来实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信