Minimally Invasive Spine Osteosynthesis (MISO) Technique for FracturesSpine: A Case Series 14 Cases

Bahaa Kornah, H. Safwat, Mohamed Abdel-AAl
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Spine Osteosynthesis (MISO) Technique for FracturesSpine: A Case Series 14 Cases","authors":"Bahaa Kornah, H. Safwat, Mohamed Abdel-AAl","doi":"10.4172/2167-1222.1000336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The choice of treatment of dorso-lumbar spinal fractures in the absence of neurological deficit depends on the classification and severity of injury. In the conventional open approach with posterior pedicle screw fixation, detachment of the Para spinal muscles may be required. In addition, this open approach may be disadvantaged by prolonged operative time, increased intraoperative bleeding and delayed functional rehabilitation. All these problems appear to encourage orthopedic surgeons to limit secondary iatrogenic insult in these patients by mini open surgery. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of minimally invasive treatment of dorsolumbar fractures by mini open surgical pedicle screw fixation and to discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of this procedure. Patients and methods: This is a prospective study involves 14 Patients (10 males) treated and followed between Feb. 2010 to Feb 2014. All had acute traumatic single level dorso-lumbar spine fractures, age range 17-47 years (mean 30.1 ± 7.9 yrs). Patients with pathological fractures, neurological injury, anatomical variations of the cord or vertebrae, mental illness, significant surgical contraindications, osteoporosis, refusing to sign informed consent and those with (TLICS) score ≤4 or load sharing score ≥7 were excluded from the study. All the cases had been treated by minimal invasive posterior approach. Total of 56 screws and 28 rods were applied utilizing the conventional posterior instrumentation. Results: Mean post-operative hospital stay 3.8 days. No major complications as spinal cord, nerve root or blood vessel injuries occurred. No screws were broken and just two screws were malpositioned. All patients improved clinically, and the outcome (according to modified MacNab criteria) was considered excellent in six patients, good in seven, and poor in one patient. Conclusion: Mini open surgery for posterior pedicle screws fixation has attracting increasing attention as it brings a multitude of advantages including: less bleeding, lower incidence of postoperative intractable low back pain and reduced hospitalization stay. However; some shortcomings as limited indications, unsuitability for long segment fusion and high load-sharing score patients restricts its worldwide prevalence.","PeriodicalId":90636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of trauma & treatment","volume":"2016 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of trauma & treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1222.1000336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The choice of treatment of dorso-lumbar spinal fractures in the absence of neurological deficit depends on the classification and severity of injury. In the conventional open approach with posterior pedicle screw fixation, detachment of the Para spinal muscles may be required. In addition, this open approach may be disadvantaged by prolonged operative time, increased intraoperative bleeding and delayed functional rehabilitation. All these problems appear to encourage orthopedic surgeons to limit secondary iatrogenic insult in these patients by mini open surgery. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of minimally invasive treatment of dorsolumbar fractures by mini open surgical pedicle screw fixation and to discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of this procedure. Patients and methods: This is a prospective study involves 14 Patients (10 males) treated and followed between Feb. 2010 to Feb 2014. All had acute traumatic single level dorso-lumbar spine fractures, age range 17-47 years (mean 30.1 ± 7.9 yrs). Patients with pathological fractures, neurological injury, anatomical variations of the cord or vertebrae, mental illness, significant surgical contraindications, osteoporosis, refusing to sign informed consent and those with (TLICS) score ≤4 or load sharing score ≥7 were excluded from the study. All the cases had been treated by minimal invasive posterior approach. Total of 56 screws and 28 rods were applied utilizing the conventional posterior instrumentation. Results: Mean post-operative hospital stay 3.8 days. No major complications as spinal cord, nerve root or blood vessel injuries occurred. No screws were broken and just two screws were malpositioned. All patients improved clinically, and the outcome (according to modified MacNab criteria) was considered excellent in six patients, good in seven, and poor in one patient. Conclusion: Mini open surgery for posterior pedicle screws fixation has attracting increasing attention as it brings a multitude of advantages including: less bleeding, lower incidence of postoperative intractable low back pain and reduced hospitalization stay. However; some shortcomings as limited indications, unsuitability for long segment fusion and high load-sharing score patients restricts its worldwide prevalence.
微创脊柱骨融合术治疗脊柱骨折14例
背景:无神经功能缺损的腰背部骨折的治疗选择取决于损伤的分类和严重程度。在传统的开放入路后路椎弓根螺钉固定中,可能需要分离脊柱旁肌肉。此外,这种开放入路可能会延长手术时间,增加术中出血和延迟功能康复。所有这些问题似乎鼓励骨科医生通过小型开放手术来限制这些患者的继发性医源性损伤。本研究的目的是评估微创微创治疗腰背骨折的效果,并讨论该方法的潜在优点和缺点。患者和方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,涉及14例患者(10名男性),于2010年2月至2014年2月接受治疗和随访。所有患者均为急性创伤性单节段背腰椎骨折,年龄17 ~ 47岁(平均30.1±7.9岁)。病理性骨折、神经损伤、脊髓或脊椎骨解剖变异、精神疾病、重大手术禁忌症、骨质疏松、拒绝签署知情同意书以及(TLICS)评分≤4分或负荷分担评分≥7分的患者被排除在研究之外。所有病例均经微创后路手术治疗。采用常规后路内固定,共使用56颗螺钉和28根棒。结果:术后平均住院时间3.8天。无脊髓、神经根、血管损伤等重大并发症。没有螺钉断裂,只有两个螺钉错位。所有患者均有临床改善,结果(根据修改的MacNab标准)6例为优,7例为良,1例为差。结论:微创开放手术治疗后路椎弓根螺钉固定术因其具有出血少、术后顽固性腰痛发生率低、住院时间短等优点而越来越受到人们的重视。然而;适应症有限、不适合长节段融合、负荷分担评分高等缺点限制了其在世界范围内的普及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信