Customary international law is law in South Africa — Now what? Analysing the courts’ identification and application of customary international law over the last decade

Q3 Social Sciences
Andreas Coutsoudis
{"title":"Customary international law is law in South Africa — Now what? Analysing the courts’ identification and application of customary international law over the last decade","authors":"Andreas Coutsoudis","doi":"10.47348/salj/v140/i1a4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Customary international law is law in South Africa as much as property law, company law or contract law. It may not be as frequently relevant or applicable as many parts of domestic law. Courts and domestic legal practitioners may not be as familiar with its contours, nuances and methods of identification. But it is precisely for these reasons that it matters more, not less, how courts, legal practitioners and the parties they represent approach it. This article describes and analyses South African courts’ engagement with customary international law, particularly over the last decade. The analysis reveals that important issues of customary international law are determined and applied by South African courts. Thus, customary international law cannot be avoided; nor should it be. However, the analysis also reveals that the courts’ engagement with customary international law would benefit from a more reflective, rigorous and considered approach. Building on the analysis and description of South African courts’ past identification and application of customary international law, the article offers suggestions for how the road ahead ought to be navigated. It is past time for South African courts to give proper consideration as to how, both procedurally and substantively, they and the parties before them ought to approach the identification of customary international law. For customary international law is not some exotic and indeterminate set of rules emanating from another legal system. It is part of South African law. The sooner it is fully treated as such, the better it will be for courts, practitioners, litigants, and international law more generally.","PeriodicalId":39313,"journal":{"name":"South African law journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47348/salj/v140/i1a4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Customary international law is law in South Africa as much as property law, company law or contract law. It may not be as frequently relevant or applicable as many parts of domestic law. Courts and domestic legal practitioners may not be as familiar with its contours, nuances and methods of identification. But it is precisely for these reasons that it matters more, not less, how courts, legal practitioners and the parties they represent approach it. This article describes and analyses South African courts’ engagement with customary international law, particularly over the last decade. The analysis reveals that important issues of customary international law are determined and applied by South African courts. Thus, customary international law cannot be avoided; nor should it be. However, the analysis also reveals that the courts’ engagement with customary international law would benefit from a more reflective, rigorous and considered approach. Building on the analysis and description of South African courts’ past identification and application of customary international law, the article offers suggestions for how the road ahead ought to be navigated. It is past time for South African courts to give proper consideration as to how, both procedurally and substantively, they and the parties before them ought to approach the identification of customary international law. For customary international law is not some exotic and indeterminate set of rules emanating from another legal system. It is part of South African law. The sooner it is fully treated as such, the better it will be for courts, practitioners, litigants, and international law more generally.
习惯国际法是南非的法律-现在怎么办?分析过去十年来法院对习惯国际法的认定和适用
习惯国际法与物权法、公司法或合同法一样,都是南非的法律。它可能不像国内法的许多部分那样经常相关或适用。法院和国内法律从业人员可能不太熟悉其轮廓、细微差别和识别方法。但正是由于这些原因,法院、法律从业人员和他们所代表的各方如何处理这一问题更为重要,而不是更少。本文描述和分析了南非法院对习惯国际法的参与,特别是在过去十年中。分析表明,习惯国际法的重要问题由南非法院决定和适用。因此,习惯国际法是不可避免的;也不应该是这样。然而,分析还表明,法院对习惯国际法的参与将受益于一种更深思熟虑、更严格和更深思熟虑的方法。本文在分析和描述南非法院过去对习惯国际法的认定和适用的基础上,对今后的道路应如何导航提出了建议。南非法院早就应该适当考虑它们和它们面前的各方应该如何在程序上和实质性上处理确定习惯国际法的问题。因为习惯国际法不是从另一个法律制度中产生的一套外来的和不确定的规则。这是南非法律的一部分。越早将其完全视为这样,对法院、从业者、诉讼当事人和更普遍的国际法就越有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African law journal
South African law journal Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信