Notes: State liability in respect of a child negligently injured at an early childhood development centre: A critical assessment of BE obo JE v MEC for Social Development, Western Cape

Q3 Social Sciences
B. Clark, W. Holness
{"title":"Notes: State liability in respect of a child negligently injured at an early childhood development centre: A critical assessment of BE obo JE v MEC for Social Development, Western Cape","authors":"B. Clark, W. Holness","doi":"10.47348/salj/v139/i3a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case note compares the judgments of the Western Cape High Court, the Supreme Court of Appeal and the Constitutional Court in BE on behalf of JE v MEC for Social Development, Western Cape. It suggests that the conclusion reached by the Western Cape High Court was not only the better decision in terms of a just outcome, but also the right decision when weighing the facts against the applicable statutory framework and case law, including the relevant international law. Furthermore, the case note submits that the approaches of the two higher courts to the wrong fulness inquiry were not in line with a children’s-rights approach and did not consider the state’s duty under international law to protect children’s rights, including the child’s right to play in a safe environment and to education, inclusive of the period from early childhood to birth.","PeriodicalId":39313,"journal":{"name":"South African law journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47348/salj/v139/i3a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case note compares the judgments of the Western Cape High Court, the Supreme Court of Appeal and the Constitutional Court in BE on behalf of JE v MEC for Social Development, Western Cape. It suggests that the conclusion reached by the Western Cape High Court was not only the better decision in terms of a just outcome, but also the right decision when weighing the facts against the applicable statutory framework and case law, including the relevant international law. Furthermore, the case note submits that the approaches of the two higher courts to the wrong fulness inquiry were not in line with a children’s-rights approach and did not consider the state’s duty under international law to protect children’s rights, including the child’s right to play in a safe environment and to education, inclusive of the period from early childhood to birth.
注:关于儿童在儿童早期发展中心疏忽受伤的国家责任:对西开普省JE诉MEC社会发展的重要评估
本案例说明比较了西开普省高等法院、最高上诉法院和西开普省宪法法院代表JE诉MEC社会发展一案的判决。它表明,西开普高等法院作出的结论不仅就公正的结果而言是更好的决定,而且在将事实与适用的成文法框架和判例法,包括有关的国际法进行权衡时也是正确的决定。此外,案件说明指出,两个高级法院对错误性调查的做法不符合儿童权利的做法,没有考虑到国际法规定的国家保护儿童权利的义务,包括儿童在安全环境中玩耍和受教育的权利,包括从幼儿期到出生期间的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African law journal
South African law journal Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信