Study on the biodegradation of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and PFOS alternatives

Q3 Medicine
Bong-In Choi, S. Na, Jun-Hyo Son, Dong-Soo Shin, B. Ryu, Kyun-Suk Byeon, Seon-Yong Chung
{"title":"Study on the biodegradation of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and PFOS alternatives","authors":"Bong-In Choi, S. Na, Jun-Hyo Son, Dong-Soo Shin, B. Ryu, Kyun-Suk Byeon, Seon-Yong Chung","doi":"10.5620/eht.e2016002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives In this study, we investigated the biodegradation features of 4 perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) alternatives developed at Changwon National University compared to those of PFOS. Methods Biodegradation testing was performed with microorganisms cultured in the good laboratory practice laboratory of the Korea Environment Corporation for 28 days following the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development guidelines for the testing of chemicals (Test No. 301 C). Results While C8F17SO3Na, PFOS sodium salt was not degraded after 28 days, the 4 alternatives were biodegraded at the rates of 20.9% for C15F9H21S2O8Na2, 8.4% for C17F9H 25S2O8Na2, 22.6% for C23F18H28S2O8Na2, and 23.6% for C25F17H32O13S3Na3. Conclusions C25F17H32S3O13Na3, C23F18H28S2O8Na2, and C15F9H21S2O8Na2 were superior to PFOS in terms of biodegradation rates and surface tension, and thus they were considered highly applicable as PFOS alternatives. Environmental toxicity, human toxicity, and economic feasibility of these compounds should be investigated prior to their commercialization.","PeriodicalId":11853,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health and Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5620/eht.e2016002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives In this study, we investigated the biodegradation features of 4 perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) alternatives developed at Changwon National University compared to those of PFOS. Methods Biodegradation testing was performed with microorganisms cultured in the good laboratory practice laboratory of the Korea Environment Corporation for 28 days following the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development guidelines for the testing of chemicals (Test No. 301 C). Results While C8F17SO3Na, PFOS sodium salt was not degraded after 28 days, the 4 alternatives were biodegraded at the rates of 20.9% for C15F9H21S2O8Na2, 8.4% for C17F9H 25S2O8Na2, 22.6% for C23F18H28S2O8Na2, and 23.6% for C25F17H32O13S3Na3. Conclusions C25F17H32S3O13Na3, C23F18H28S2O8Na2, and C15F9H21S2O8Na2 were superior to PFOS in terms of biodegradation rates and surface tension, and thus they were considered highly applicable as PFOS alternatives. Environmental toxicity, human toxicity, and economic feasibility of these compounds should be investigated prior to their commercialization.
全氟辛烷磺酸及其替代品的生物降解研究
在这项研究中,我们研究了昌原国立大学开发的4种全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)替代品的生物降解特性,并与全氟辛烷磺酸进行了比较。方法按照经济合作与发展组织(oecd)化学品试验指南(试验No. 301 C),在韩国环境公司优良实验室培养的微生物进行28 d的生物降解试验。结果28 d后,C8F17SO3Na、PFOS钠盐的生物降解率为20.9%,C15F9H21S2O8Na2的生物降解率为8.4%,c15f9h 25S2O8Na2的生物降解率为8.4%。C23F18H28S2O8Na2为22.6%,C25F17H32O13S3Na3为23.6%。结论C25F17H32S3O13Na3、C23F18H28S2O8Na2和C15F9H21S2O8Na2在生物降解率和表面张力方面均优于PFOS,可作为PFOS的替代品。这些化合物的环境毒性、人体毒性和经济可行性应在其商业化之前进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Health and Toxicology
Environmental Health and Toxicology Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信