Fetal Response to Sound and Light: Possible Fetal Education?

K. Maeda, M. Tatsumura
{"title":"Fetal Response to Sound and Light: Possible Fetal Education?","authors":"K. Maeda, M. Tatsumura","doi":"10.4172/2167-0897.1000247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess fetal well-being and education ability by fetal response to sound and light. Material: Intrauterine fetuses in late pregnancy. Methods: The sound source was a loud speaker connected to an audioamplifier, of which source was sine waves, generated in a stimulator. The sound power was measured by an audiometer. The loud speaker was placed at the pregnant abdomen. A photographic speed light, of which guide number was 25, was flushed at pregnant abdomen around at fetal face, in the photic stimulation. Results: Acoustic and visual stimulation effects were fetal movements and heart rate (FHR) acceleration in fetal actocardiogram. The stimulation with 1,000 Hz 80 decibel (dB) sound for 2 S produced positive effects at 28 weeks, while 60 dB sounds achieved positive effects in 40 weeks, namely, sound sensitivity increased 10 folds in late pregnancy. Although foetuses responded to 250 and 500 Hz sound in 28 and 40 weeks, sound intensity reduction was insignificant. Positive results to photic stimulation were noted in 23 or later weeks and 77% cases achieved positive results in 40 weeks. Discussion: Positive effect of sound and light stimulation was fetal movements and FHR acceleration, which were the sign of healthy fetal brain, while, significant sound power reduction was noted only in 1,000 Hz, higher frequency than maternal voice, thus, fetal education will not be expected, and mother voice should be changed to 1,000 Hz using a voice changer in fetal education, however, healthy fetal hearing is expected by the response to 250-1,000 Hz sound and the response to flush light is the sign of healthy fetal retina and light sensing.","PeriodicalId":73850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal biology","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2167-0897.1000247","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0897.1000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: To assess fetal well-being and education ability by fetal response to sound and light. Material: Intrauterine fetuses in late pregnancy. Methods: The sound source was a loud speaker connected to an audioamplifier, of which source was sine waves, generated in a stimulator. The sound power was measured by an audiometer. The loud speaker was placed at the pregnant abdomen. A photographic speed light, of which guide number was 25, was flushed at pregnant abdomen around at fetal face, in the photic stimulation. Results: Acoustic and visual stimulation effects were fetal movements and heart rate (FHR) acceleration in fetal actocardiogram. The stimulation with 1,000 Hz 80 decibel (dB) sound for 2 S produced positive effects at 28 weeks, while 60 dB sounds achieved positive effects in 40 weeks, namely, sound sensitivity increased 10 folds in late pregnancy. Although foetuses responded to 250 and 500 Hz sound in 28 and 40 weeks, sound intensity reduction was insignificant. Positive results to photic stimulation were noted in 23 or later weeks and 77% cases achieved positive results in 40 weeks. Discussion: Positive effect of sound and light stimulation was fetal movements and FHR acceleration, which were the sign of healthy fetal brain, while, significant sound power reduction was noted only in 1,000 Hz, higher frequency than maternal voice, thus, fetal education will not be expected, and mother voice should be changed to 1,000 Hz using a voice changer in fetal education, however, healthy fetal hearing is expected by the response to 250-1,000 Hz sound and the response to flush light is the sign of healthy fetal retina and light sensing.
胎儿对声光的反应:可能的胎教?
目的:通过胎儿对声光的反应来评价胎儿的健康状况和教育能力。材料:妊娠晚期的宫内胎儿。方法:声源为连接音响放大器的扬声器,声源为在刺激器中产生的正弦波。声音功率是用听力计测量的。扩音器被放置在孕妇的腹部。在光刺激下,将导光数为25的照相速光照射在胎儿面部周围的孕妇腹部。结果:声光刺激和视觉刺激对胎儿胎动和胎儿心电图心率加速均有影响。1000 Hz 80分贝(dB)的声音刺激2 S,在28周时产生积极效果,而60分贝的声音刺激在40周时产生积极效果,即声音敏感性在妊娠后期增加了10倍。虽然胎儿在28周和40周时对250和500 Hz的声音有反应,但声强降低不显著。光刺激23周或更晚出现阳性结果,77%的病例在40周内出现阳性结果。讨论:声光刺激的积极作用是胎动和胎速加快,这是胎儿大脑健康的标志,而只有在频率高于母声的1000 Hz时才会出现明显的声功率降低,因此不期望进行胎教,但在胎教中应使用变声器将母声改为1000 Hz。胎儿对250-1,000 Hz声音的反应是健康的听力,而对红光的反应是胎儿视网膜和光感健康的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信