Can the learning styles of surgical residents impact their capacity to succeed in different learning environments? A case study

K. Lang, T. Hoover, Marie A. Hunsinger, M. Shabahang
{"title":"Can the learning styles of surgical residents impact their capacity to succeed in different learning environments? A case study","authors":"K. Lang, T. Hoover, Marie A. Hunsinger, M. Shabahang","doi":"10.5455/jcme.20190801103618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Fleming developed VARK (visual, aural, read/write and kinesthetic) as an acronym to describe different learning styles. The purpose of this study is to identify the particular teaching settings that are most and least conducive to learning for visual, aural, reading/writing and kinesthetic surgical residents and attending physicians. Methods: This is a qualitative and quantitative study based on focus group data and anonymous questionnaires. Focus groups were conducted with 27 residents and attending physicians in the general surgery department. Respondents were divided into five different groups (interns, mid-years, chiefs, pre-duty hour attendings and post-duty hour attendings). During the focus groups, short questionnaires were also administered to the respondents. Results: Overall, both residents and attending physicians felt that it would be ideal to increase the time spent in certain learning environments such as the operating room and simulation lab. There was not a significant difference in responses among the five groups. In addition, the results show that the different learning styles of respondents inform the ideal amount of time they should spend in each learning environment. More specifically, kinesthetic learners feel more time should be spent in the operating room (41.5% of the time), clinic (10.9% of time) and simulation lab (7.2% of time). Conversely, they feel that less time should be spent in lecture (7.4% of time) and in group-learning settings (3.4 % of time) compared to the other three groups of learners. Conclusions: These findings can help explain why the same learner can excel in one learning environment and not in others. This research builds on the finding that different types of learners find some learning environments to be more conducive to learning than others.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"10 1","pages":"5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20190801103618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Fleming developed VARK (visual, aural, read/write and kinesthetic) as an acronym to describe different learning styles. The purpose of this study is to identify the particular teaching settings that are most and least conducive to learning for visual, aural, reading/writing and kinesthetic surgical residents and attending physicians. Methods: This is a qualitative and quantitative study based on focus group data and anonymous questionnaires. Focus groups were conducted with 27 residents and attending physicians in the general surgery department. Respondents were divided into five different groups (interns, mid-years, chiefs, pre-duty hour attendings and post-duty hour attendings). During the focus groups, short questionnaires were also administered to the respondents. Results: Overall, both residents and attending physicians felt that it would be ideal to increase the time spent in certain learning environments such as the operating room and simulation lab. There was not a significant difference in responses among the five groups. In addition, the results show that the different learning styles of respondents inform the ideal amount of time they should spend in each learning environment. More specifically, kinesthetic learners feel more time should be spent in the operating room (41.5% of the time), clinic (10.9% of time) and simulation lab (7.2% of time). Conversely, they feel that less time should be spent in lecture (7.4% of time) and in group-learning settings (3.4 % of time) compared to the other three groups of learners. Conclusions: These findings can help explain why the same learner can excel in one learning environment and not in others. This research builds on the finding that different types of learners find some learning environments to be more conducive to learning than others.
外科住院医师的学习风格会影响他们在不同学习环境中取得成功的能力吗?案例研究
目的:弗莱明开发了VARK(视觉、听觉、读写和动觉)作为描述不同学习风格的首字母缩略词。本研究的目的是找出最有利于视觉、听觉、阅读/写作和动觉外科住院医师和主治医师学习的特定教学环境。方法:采用焦点小组数据和匿名问卷调查相结合的定性和定量研究方法。对27名普通外科住院医师和主治医师进行了焦点小组研究。受访者被分为五个不同的组(实习生、中年、主管、值班前和值班后)。在焦点小组期间,还向受访者发放了简短的问卷。结果:总体而言,住院医生和主治医生都认为增加在手术室和模拟实验室等特定学习环境中的时间是理想的。五组之间的反应没有显著差异。此外,结果表明,不同的学习风格的受访者告知理想的时间量,他们应该花在每个学习环境。更具体地说,动觉型学习者认为更多的时间应该花在手术室(41.5%的时间)、诊所(10.9%的时间)和模拟实验室(7.2%的时间)。相反,与其他三组学习者相比,他们认为花在讲座(7.4%的时间)和小组学习环境(3.4%的时间)上的时间应该更少。结论:这些发现可以帮助解释为什么同一个学习者可以在一个学习环境中表现出色,而在另一个学习环境中却表现不佳。这项研究建立在发现不同类型的学习者发现一些学习环境比其他环境更有利于学习的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书