Comparing the effectiveness of self-directed video tour versus an attending-led tour in Pediatric Emergency Department Orientation -

J. Michael, Sarah M. Weston, Calie M. Donohue, C. Tarantino, A. Sherman, William L. Findlay, Kadriye O. Lewis
{"title":"Comparing the effectiveness of self-directed video tour versus an attending-led tour in Pediatric Emergency Department Orientation -","authors":"J. Michael, Sarah M. Weston, Calie M. Donohue, C. Tarantino, A. Sherman, William L. Findlay, Kadriye O. Lewis","doi":"10.5455/jcme.20171028060343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Providing an emergency department tour to medical trainees as part of their pediatric emergency medicine clerkship orientation is important in order to teach significant location and safety features. For many years, we provided an attending-led tour, but increased faculty demands on faculty time prompted us to develop a self-directed video-based tour to replace the attending-led tour. This study compares the learning effectiveness between the two methods. Methods: A single-site quasi-experimental design study was conducted to assess knowledge acquisition and satisfaction of medical trainees between two instructional methods (an attending-led tour and a self-directed video-based tour). Groups were assigned an attending-led or self-directed video tour covering identical content. Trainees completed post-tour knowledge acquisition and satisfaction surveys. Mann-Whitney U tests were used for group comparisons of the knowledge acquisition and satisfaction total scores. Spearman correlations were used to look for a relationship between the knowledge acquisition and satisfaction scores. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare groups on categorical variables. Results: A total of 62 subjects were enrolled; 31 participated in an attending-led tour, and 31 in a video tour. The knowledge acquisition survey (median score 12 vs. 11, p = 0.021) favored the attending-led tour. Total scores for the 5-point satisfaction (median score 47 vs. 40, p = 0.001) and collapsed 3-point satisfaction surveys (median score 30 vs. 29, p = 0.008) also favored the attending-led tour. Conclusions: Although medical trainees favored the attending-led tour over the video tour, the difference was not significant enough to justify terminating the video tour. We believe that this first-time implementation of a self-directed video-based tour is novel. After making further design improvements, we will continue to investigate its plausibility, since it has potential to augment in-person teaching time for educational faculty.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"6 1","pages":"26-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20171028060343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Providing an emergency department tour to medical trainees as part of their pediatric emergency medicine clerkship orientation is important in order to teach significant location and safety features. For many years, we provided an attending-led tour, but increased faculty demands on faculty time prompted us to develop a self-directed video-based tour to replace the attending-led tour. This study compares the learning effectiveness between the two methods. Methods: A single-site quasi-experimental design study was conducted to assess knowledge acquisition and satisfaction of medical trainees between two instructional methods (an attending-led tour and a self-directed video-based tour). Groups were assigned an attending-led or self-directed video tour covering identical content. Trainees completed post-tour knowledge acquisition and satisfaction surveys. Mann-Whitney U tests were used for group comparisons of the knowledge acquisition and satisfaction total scores. Spearman correlations were used to look for a relationship between the knowledge acquisition and satisfaction scores. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare groups on categorical variables. Results: A total of 62 subjects were enrolled; 31 participated in an attending-led tour, and 31 in a video tour. The knowledge acquisition survey (median score 12 vs. 11, p = 0.021) favored the attending-led tour. Total scores for the 5-point satisfaction (median score 47 vs. 40, p = 0.001) and collapsed 3-point satisfaction surveys (median score 30 vs. 29, p = 0.008) also favored the attending-led tour. Conclusions: Although medical trainees favored the attending-led tour over the video tour, the difference was not significant enough to justify terminating the video tour. We believe that this first-time implementation of a self-directed video-based tour is novel. After making further design improvements, we will continue to investigate its plausibility, since it has potential to augment in-person teaching time for educational faculty.
在儿科急诊科培训中,自我指导视频导览与主治导览的效果比较
目的:为医学实习生提供急诊科参观,作为他们儿科急诊医学实习的一部分,对于教授重要的位置和安全特征是很重要的。多年来,我们一直提供有导游带领的导览,但教师对时间的要求越来越高,促使我们开发了一种基于视频的自主导览,以取代有导游带领的导览。本研究比较了两种学习方法的学习效果。方法:采用单点准实验设计研究,对两种教学方式(导览式和自导式视频导览式)下医学实习生的知识获取和满意度进行评估。每个小组都被分配了一个由导游带领或自我指导的视频之旅,内容相同。学员完成了参观后的知识获取和满意度调查。采用Mann-Whitney U检验进行知识获取与满意度总分的组间比较。斯皮尔曼相关被用来寻找知识获取和满意度得分之间的关系。使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验来比较分类变量的组。结果:共纳入受试者62例;31人参加了有导游的参观,31人参加了视频参观。知识获取调查(中位数得分12比11,p = 0.021)倾向于导游。5分满意度的总得分(中位数为47比40,p = 0.001)和崩溃的3分满意度调查(中位数为30比29,p = 0.008)也倾向于参加导游。结论:虽然实习医师对陪同导览的偏好高于视频导览,但差异并不显著,不足以作为终止视频导览的理由。我们相信,这种首次实施的自我指导的视频旅游是新颖的。在进一步改进设计后,我们将继续调查其可行性,因为它有可能增加教育教师的面对面教学时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信