Rapid Versus Slow Advancement of Feeds in Preterm Babies Less than 34 Weeksin Incidence of NEC and Feed Intolerance

R. Kadam, V. Prasad, M. Santosh
{"title":"Rapid Versus Slow Advancement of Feeds in Preterm Babies Less than 34 Weeksin Incidence of NEC and Feed Intolerance","authors":"R. Kadam, V. Prasad, M. Santosh","doi":"10.4172/2167-0897.1000214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate whether preterm neonates less than 34 weeks at birth receiving rapid enteral feeding advancement at 25-30 ml/kg/day and those receiving slow enteral feeding advancement at 15-20 mL⁄kg⁄day to attain full feeding (180 ml/kg/day) are atincrease in the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis or feed intolerance. \nStudy design: Retrospective cohort study. \nSetting: Level III Neonatal Unit in Southern India Subjects: Neonates born at <34 weeks of gestational age and admitted to the NICU during study period were enrolled. \nOutcome: Mortality and major morbidity - NEC as per Bell staging, incidence of feedintolerance. \nResults: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The average gain in weight, length and head circumference were significantly lower in the slow feeding group as compared rapid feeding group. The mean days to reach birth weight was less in rapid feeding group; 12.43 vs. 15.46 in slow feeding group (p=0.04). It was inferred that duration of hospital stay (22.58 vs. 31.34 days) and parenteral nutrition( 8.69 vs. 11.18 days) was less in rapid feeding group as compared to slow feeding group (p= 0.04). Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation Rapid feeding group does not have increased episodes of feed intolerance or NEC (5 vs. 6 cases) compared to slow feeding group. Conclusions: Our study support enteral nutrition by rapid enter","PeriodicalId":73850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal biology","volume":"2016 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2167-0897.1000214","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0897.1000214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether preterm neonates less than 34 weeks at birth receiving rapid enteral feeding advancement at 25-30 ml/kg/day and those receiving slow enteral feeding advancement at 15-20 mL⁄kg⁄day to attain full feeding (180 ml/kg/day) are atincrease in the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis or feed intolerance. Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Level III Neonatal Unit in Southern India Subjects: Neonates born at <34 weeks of gestational age and admitted to the NICU during study period were enrolled. Outcome: Mortality and major morbidity - NEC as per Bell staging, incidence of feedintolerance. Results: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The average gain in weight, length and head circumference were significantly lower in the slow feeding group as compared rapid feeding group. The mean days to reach birth weight was less in rapid feeding group; 12.43 vs. 15.46 in slow feeding group (p=0.04). It was inferred that duration of hospital stay (22.58 vs. 31.34 days) and parenteral nutrition( 8.69 vs. 11.18 days) was less in rapid feeding group as compared to slow feeding group (p= 0.04). Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation Rapid feeding group does not have increased episodes of feed intolerance or NEC (5 vs. 6 cases) compared to slow feeding group. Conclusions: Our study support enteral nutrition by rapid enter
小于34周的早产儿喂养的快速与缓慢:NEC和喂养不耐受的发生率
目的:评价小于34周出生的早产儿接受25-30 ml/kg/天快速肠内喂养和接受15-20 ml/kg/天缓慢肠内喂养以达到完全喂养(180 ml/kg/天)是否会增加坏死性小肠结肠炎或饲料不耐受的发生率。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:印度南部III级新生儿病房研究对象:在研究期间入住NICU的小于34周出生的新生儿。结果:死亡率和主要发病率-按贝尔分期的NEC,喂养不耐受的发生率。结果:两组具有相似的基线特征。慢饲组的平均增重、体长和头围均显著低于快饲组。快速喂养组达到出生体重的平均天数较短;慢饲组12.43比15.46 (p=0.04)。快速喂养组患儿住院时间(22.58天vs. 31.34天)和肠外营养时间(8.69天vs. 11.18天)均少于慢速喂养组(p= 0.04)。与慢速喂养组相比,快速喂养组没有增加饲料不耐受或NEC的发作(5例对6例)。结论:本研究支持快速进入肠内营养
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信