What is an appropriate social scenario for staff and students at an Australian Rural Clinical School? A survey of 4th and 5th year medical student’s resident in rural Tasmania

Emma Beddows, Harry Laughlin, Alana Easthaugh, D. Liew, Kim Robitschko, M. Buist
{"title":"What is an appropriate social scenario for staff and students at an Australian Rural Clinical School? A survey of 4th and 5th year medical student’s resident in rural Tasmania","authors":"Emma Beddows, Harry Laughlin, Alana Easthaugh, D. Liew, Kim Robitschko, M. Buist","doi":"10.5455/JCME.20170123025249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The degree of comfort that medical students have in different social settings with staff and faculty has not been documented. Methods: We undertook in 2012 a survey of 53 fourth and fifth year medical students at the University of Tasmanian Rural Clinical School to determine the incidence of previous inappropriate social invitations/interactions and perceptions of comfort to 5 different hypothetical social scenarios of different appropriateness. Results: Two students had received what they considered to be an inappropriate invitation. Most students were comfortable with communal public social situations. However, in an overt “date” scenario 8 students were either completely at ease with or comfortable. Eighteen students although uncomfortable with this scenario would still attend and only 14 students would decline the invitation. Conclusion: There needs to be increased awareness that certain social interactions between health professionals when there is significant difference in hierarchy may not always be appropriate","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"5 1","pages":"6-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JCME.20170123025249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The degree of comfort that medical students have in different social settings with staff and faculty has not been documented. Methods: We undertook in 2012 a survey of 53 fourth and fifth year medical students at the University of Tasmanian Rural Clinical School to determine the incidence of previous inappropriate social invitations/interactions and perceptions of comfort to 5 different hypothetical social scenarios of different appropriateness. Results: Two students had received what they considered to be an inappropriate invitation. Most students were comfortable with communal public social situations. However, in an overt “date” scenario 8 students were either completely at ease with or comfortable. Eighteen students although uncomfortable with this scenario would still attend and only 14 students would decline the invitation. Conclusion: There needs to be increased awareness that certain social interactions between health professionals when there is significant difference in hierarchy may not always be appropriate
对澳大利亚农村临床学校的教职员工和学生来说,什么是合适的社交场景?对塔斯马尼亚农村地区四、五年级医学生的调查
引言:医学生在不同的社会环境中与教职员工的舒适程度尚未有文献记载。方法:我们于2012年对塔斯马尼亚大学农村临床学校的53名四年级和五年级医学生进行调查,以确定先前不适当的社交邀请/互动的发生率和对5种不同适当性的假设社交场景的舒适度。结果:两名学生收到了他们认为不合适的邀请。大多数学生都能适应公共社交场合。然而,在公开的“约会”场景中,学生们要么完全放松,要么很舒服。18名学生虽然对这种情况感到不舒服,但仍然会参加,只有14名学生拒绝了邀请。结论:当存在显著的等级差异时,卫生专业人员之间的某些社会互动可能并不总是合适的,这一点需要提高认识
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信