Lactic Dehydrogenase in Umbilical Cord Blood in Healthy Infants after Different Modes of Delivery

E. Wiberg-Itzel, Hampus Josephson, N. Wiberg, L. Olson, B. Winbladh, Mathias Karlsson
{"title":"Lactic Dehydrogenase in Umbilical Cord Blood in Healthy Infants after Different Modes of Delivery","authors":"E. Wiberg-Itzel, Hampus Josephson, N. Wiberg, L. Olson, B. Winbladh, Mathias Karlsson","doi":"10.4172/2167-0897.1000204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: LDH may be a valuable marker for some of the most important diseases in newborns, and umbilical cord blood is a non-invasive and easy way to obtain blood for analysis. Aims of this study were to define interval for LDH in arterial and venous cord blood at delivery in truly healthy newborns. \nMethod: a prospective observational study was performed at Soder Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden during 2011-2012. Umbilical cord blood was collected at delivery, and value of LDH was analysed in 549 healthy infants >37 weeks of gestation, born after an uncomplicated pregnancy from a healthy mother. \nResults: The 2.5th and 97.5th percentile for arterial LDH was 162-612 u/L and 252-636 u/L for venous LDH. Instrumental delivery and acute caesarian section showed significantly higher intervals and elective caesarian section significantly lower than vaginal delivery. Haemolysis (>0.3g/l) disqualified a 13-41% of the samples. Conclusion: Reported LDH levels are in accordance with earlier studies and appear to be a sensitive marker for intrapartal stress factors. The absence of an arterial/venous difference makes the sampling of cord blood easier but frequent haemolysis is a problem when using the standard method of analyses.","PeriodicalId":73850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal biology","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0897.1000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: LDH may be a valuable marker for some of the most important diseases in newborns, and umbilical cord blood is a non-invasive and easy way to obtain blood for analysis. Aims of this study were to define interval for LDH in arterial and venous cord blood at delivery in truly healthy newborns. Method: a prospective observational study was performed at Soder Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden during 2011-2012. Umbilical cord blood was collected at delivery, and value of LDH was analysed in 549 healthy infants >37 weeks of gestation, born after an uncomplicated pregnancy from a healthy mother. Results: The 2.5th and 97.5th percentile for arterial LDH was 162-612 u/L and 252-636 u/L for venous LDH. Instrumental delivery and acute caesarian section showed significantly higher intervals and elective caesarian section significantly lower than vaginal delivery. Haemolysis (>0.3g/l) disqualified a 13-41% of the samples. Conclusion: Reported LDH levels are in accordance with earlier studies and appear to be a sensitive marker for intrapartal stress factors. The absence of an arterial/venous difference makes the sampling of cord blood easier but frequent haemolysis is a problem when using the standard method of analyses.
不同分娩方式对健康婴儿脐带血乳酸脱氢酶的影响
背景:LDH可能是新生儿一些最重要疾病的有价值的标志物,而脐带血是一种无创且易于获取血液进行分析的方法。本研究的目的是确定真正健康的新生儿分娩时动脉血和静脉血中LDH的间隔。方法:2011-2012年在瑞典斯德哥尔摩Soder医院进行前瞻性观察研究。在分娩时采集脐带血,并对549名健康母亲无并发症妊娠后出生的健康婴儿进行LDH值分析。结果:动脉LDH第2.5百分位为162 ~ 612 u/L,静脉LDH第252 ~ 636 u/L;器械分娩和急性剖宫产的间隔时间明显高于阴道分娩,择期剖宫产的间隔时间明显低于阴道分娩。溶血(> .3g/l) 13-41%的样品不合格。结论:报告的LDH水平与早期研究一致,似乎是分娩时应激因素的敏感标志。动脉/静脉差异的缺失使得脐带血的采样更容易,但在使用标准分析方法时,频繁的溶血是一个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信