Has mobile technology disrupted the pedagogy of Problem Based Learning: The tutors perspective -

Sarah Wood, Matthew Wix, Lucie Byrne-Davies, C. Lumsden
{"title":"Has mobile technology disrupted the pedagogy of Problem Based Learning: The tutors perspective -","authors":"Sarah Wood, Matthew Wix, Lucie Byrne-Davies, C. Lumsden","doi":"10.5455/JCME.20160315115145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: At Manchester Medical School (MMS), mobile tablet technology is embedded within problem based learning (PBL). Anecdotally, tutors perceived a disruption to PBL. Summary of work: We employed a census survey of phase 2 PBL tutors in MMS. We queried a) demographics b) technological abilities c) perceptions of ipad use, and d) of mobile technology in PBL. Nominal and ordinal data were analysed descriptively, text responses with content analysis. Summary of results: Response rate was 58%. 82% of tutors thought ipads had changed PBL, commenting that PBL was more interactive (44%). The strongest theme, was that facilitators did not feel ipads had altered preparatory work. Emerging themes concerned the reduction of interaction within group and with facilitators. Facilitators felt groups used their ipads to clarify the setting (20%), define the problem (14%) and document intended learning outcomes(18%). Many perceived students using ipads for individual learning (21%), and group feedback (13%). Few facilitators felt that mobile tablet use had changed the pedagogic order of PBL, but had altered students approach to information gathering and presentation. Conclusion: This survey has illustrated the influence of mobile technology on the process of PBL, demonstrating tablet use in most of the 7 stages. A strong perspective is that this enhanced this process. Original Research","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"4 1","pages":"8-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JCME.20160315115145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: At Manchester Medical School (MMS), mobile tablet technology is embedded within problem based learning (PBL). Anecdotally, tutors perceived a disruption to PBL. Summary of work: We employed a census survey of phase 2 PBL tutors in MMS. We queried a) demographics b) technological abilities c) perceptions of ipad use, and d) of mobile technology in PBL. Nominal and ordinal data were analysed descriptively, text responses with content analysis. Summary of results: Response rate was 58%. 82% of tutors thought ipads had changed PBL, commenting that PBL was more interactive (44%). The strongest theme, was that facilitators did not feel ipads had altered preparatory work. Emerging themes concerned the reduction of interaction within group and with facilitators. Facilitators felt groups used their ipads to clarify the setting (20%), define the problem (14%) and document intended learning outcomes(18%). Many perceived students using ipads for individual learning (21%), and group feedback (13%). Few facilitators felt that mobile tablet use had changed the pedagogic order of PBL, but had altered students approach to information gathering and presentation. Conclusion: This survey has illustrated the influence of mobile technology on the process of PBL, demonstrating tablet use in most of the 7 stages. A strong perspective is that this enhanced this process. Original Research
移动技术是否颠覆了基于问题的学习教学法:教师的视角
背景:在曼彻斯特医学院(MMS),移动平板技术被嵌入到基于问题的学习(PBL)中。有趣的是,导师们认为PBL受到了破坏。工作总结:我们对MMS第二阶段PBL导师进行了普查调查。我们询问了a)人口统计b)技术能力c) ipad使用的认知d) PBL中的移动技术。对标称和序数数据进行描述性分析,文本响应进行内容分析。结果总结:有效率为58%。82%的教师认为ipad改变了PBL,认为PBL更具互动性(44%)。最强烈的主题是,辅导员并不认为ipad改变了准备工作。新出现的主题涉及减少小组内部和与促进者的互动。辅导员认为,小组使用ipad来澄清环境(20%),定义问题(14%)和记录预期的学习成果(18%)。许多人认为学生使用ipad进行个人学习(21%)和小组反馈(13%)。很少有辅导员认为移动平板电脑的使用改变了PBL的教学顺序,但改变了学生收集和展示信息的方法。结论:本调查显示了移动技术对PBL过程的影响,显示了7个阶段中大部分阶段的平板使用情况。一个强有力的观点是,这加强了这个过程。原始研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书