Straight to the Point: A Review of the Literature on Needle Exchange Programs in the United States

Rebecca A. Vidourek, K. King, R. Yockey, Kelsi J. Becker, A. Merianos
{"title":"Straight to the Point: A Review of the Literature on Needle Exchange\nPrograms in the United States","authors":"Rebecca A. Vidourek, K. King, R. Yockey, Kelsi J. Becker, A. Merianos","doi":"10.5455/JBH.20181023074620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As injection drug use increases, needle exchange programs are one method of reducing infectious disease transmission and improve health outcomes for this population. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of needle exchange programs. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to investigate the study aim. Specific inclusion criteria included 1) studies published in English, 2) studies examining needle exchange, 3) studies conducted in the United States, 4) studies conducted between 2007 and 2017, and 5) studies focuses on heroin and injection drug users. Exclusion criteria are also included. A total of 12 studies examining needle exchange programs were found. The research team evaluated all 12 studies and emergent themes included: (1) Reduction in risk behaviors, (2) Sex differences in use and behaviors, (3) Overall perceptions of needle/syringe exchange programs, and (4) Methodological flaws and implementation. This review indicates that NEPs are effective in reducing infectious disease and improving health outcomes. Lack of consistent methods in NEP research may be an issue. In addition, community and health professional attitudes may need to be addressed to enhance effectiveness. Programs and initiatives aimed at educating community members and others may be warranted.","PeriodicalId":90204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of behavioral health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of behavioral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JBH.20181023074620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As injection drug use increases, needle exchange programs are one method of reducing infectious disease transmission and improve health outcomes for this population. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of needle exchange programs. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to investigate the study aim. Specific inclusion criteria included 1) studies published in English, 2) studies examining needle exchange, 3) studies conducted in the United States, 4) studies conducted between 2007 and 2017, and 5) studies focuses on heroin and injection drug users. Exclusion criteria are also included. A total of 12 studies examining needle exchange programs were found. The research team evaluated all 12 studies and emergent themes included: (1) Reduction in risk behaviors, (2) Sex differences in use and behaviors, (3) Overall perceptions of needle/syringe exchange programs, and (4) Methodological flaws and implementation. This review indicates that NEPs are effective in reducing infectious disease and improving health outcomes. Lack of consistent methods in NEP research may be an issue. In addition, community and health professional attitudes may need to be addressed to enhance effectiveness. Programs and initiatives aimed at educating community members and others may be warranted.
开门见山:美国针头交换计划文献综述
随着注射毒品使用的增加,针头交换计划是减少传染病传播和改善这一人群健康状况的一种方法。本文的目的是检验针头交换计划的有效性。对文献进行了全面的回顾,以调查研究目的。具体纳入标准包括:1)发表于英文的研究;2)检查针头交换的研究;3)在美国进行的研究;4)2007年至2017年期间进行的研究;5)关注海洛因和注射吸毒者的研究。排除标准也包括在内。总共发现了12项关于针头交换计划的研究。研究小组评估了所有12项研究和紧急主题,包括:(1)减少危险行为,(2)使用和行为的性别差异,(3)针头/注射器交换计划的总体看法,以及(4)方法缺陷和实施。这一综述表明,NEPs在减少传染病和改善健康结果方面是有效的。在新经济政策研究中缺乏一致的方法可能是一个问题。此外,可能需要改变社区和保健专业人员的态度,以提高效力。旨在教育社区成员和其他人的计划和倡议可能是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信