Comparison of Two ActiGraph Accelerometers in Laboratory and Free-Living Conditions

E. Sng, Ovuokerie Addoh, P. Loprinzi
{"title":"Comparison of Two ActiGraph Accelerometers in Laboratory and Free-Living Conditions","authors":"E. Sng, Ovuokerie Addoh, P. Loprinzi","doi":"10.5455/JBH.20170924045448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Evaluate the agreement between the GT3X+ and GT9X Link with respect to the vertical axis under laboratory and free-living conditions using the Normal Filter and LFE Filter, respectively and to evaluate the agreement between the minutes spent in different activity intensities between the devices under free-living conditions using both the Normal and LFE Filter, respectively. Methods: Eight participants (mean age = 28.3 ± 3.8) were enrolled. Participants completed 4 walking trials of 2 different speeds (2 and 3 miles per hour, 3-min stages) while wearing 2 GT3X+ and 2 GT9X Link accelerometers on an elastic belt on the right sides of the hip. They continued wearing them for another 6-10 hours in the free-living setting. Results: There were no significant differences between the mean CPM between the devices for the walking trials and free-living assessment when both filters were applied. There were also no significant differences in the different physical activity intensity categories. There was strong evidence of agreement between the GT3X+ and GT9X Link. Conclusion: Data collected with the GT3X+ and GT9X Link should be comparable across past and future studies.","PeriodicalId":90204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of behavioral health","volume":"7 1","pages":"5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of behavioral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JBH.20170924045448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the agreement between the GT3X+ and GT9X Link with respect to the vertical axis under laboratory and free-living conditions using the Normal Filter and LFE Filter, respectively and to evaluate the agreement between the minutes spent in different activity intensities between the devices under free-living conditions using both the Normal and LFE Filter, respectively. Methods: Eight participants (mean age = 28.3 ± 3.8) were enrolled. Participants completed 4 walking trials of 2 different speeds (2 and 3 miles per hour, 3-min stages) while wearing 2 GT3X+ and 2 GT9X Link accelerometers on an elastic belt on the right sides of the hip. They continued wearing them for another 6-10 hours in the free-living setting. Results: There were no significant differences between the mean CPM between the devices for the walking trials and free-living assessment when both filters were applied. There were also no significant differences in the different physical activity intensity categories. There was strong evidence of agreement between the GT3X+ and GT9X Link. Conclusion: Data collected with the GT3X+ and GT9X Link should be comparable across past and future studies.
两种动图加速度计在实验室和自由生活条件下的比较
目的:评估GT3X+和GT9X Link在实验室和自由生活条件下分别使用正常过滤器和LFE过滤器的垂直轴一致性,并评估自由生活条件下分别使用正常过滤器和LFE过滤器的设备在不同活动强度下花费的分钟数之间的一致性。方法:8名参与者(平均年龄28.3 ±3.8)入组。参与者在臀部右侧的松紧带上佩戴2个GT3X+和2个GT9X Link加速计,完成了2种不同速度(每小时2英里和3英里,每阶段3分钟)的4次步行试验。他们在自由生活的环境中继续戴着它们6-10个小时。结果:使用两种过滤器时,行走试验和自由生活评估装置的平均CPM之间没有显著差异。在不同的体力活动强度类别中也没有显著差异。有强有力的证据表明GT3X+和GT9X链接之间是一致的。结论:GT3X+和GT9X链接收集的数据应该在过去和未来的研究中具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信