Cross Cultural Adaptation & Psychometric Validation of Research Instruments: a Methodological Review

S. Arafat, H. Chowdhury, M. S. Qusar, M. Hafez
{"title":"Cross Cultural Adaptation & Psychometric Validation of Research Instruments: a Methodological Review","authors":"S. Arafat, H. Chowdhury, M. S. Qusar, M. Hafez","doi":"10.5455/JBH.20160615121755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Psychometrics has a very important role and with the increase in the number of cross cultural research projects, there is need to adapt the scales to measure the health status. Objective: It was aimed to describe the validation process comprehensively based on recent practices and to overview a practical guideline of validation study. Method: Search was done in PubMed, PubMed Central & Google Scholar with searching key words ranging date from January 2000 to December 2015. Finally 78 articles were selected for review and through methodological review was done in accordance with the review objectives. Result: Review revealed that cultural adaptation followed similar steps with few variations. There was huge variation in study design, sampling technique & sample size. Cronbach’s alpha & test-retest reliability was mostly used form of reliability with variations in assessment of validity. Exploratory Factor Analysis was used more for statistical analysis & followed similar criteria with few variations. Conclusion: Cross cultural measurement of health outcomes is really an important and challenging issue that needs elaborative guideline to take appropriate steps to solve problems.","PeriodicalId":90204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of behavioral health","volume":"5 1","pages":"129-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"175","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of behavioral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JBH.20160615121755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 175

Abstract

Background: Psychometrics has a very important role and with the increase in the number of cross cultural research projects, there is need to adapt the scales to measure the health status. Objective: It was aimed to describe the validation process comprehensively based on recent practices and to overview a practical guideline of validation study. Method: Search was done in PubMed, PubMed Central & Google Scholar with searching key words ranging date from January 2000 to December 2015. Finally 78 articles were selected for review and through methodological review was done in accordance with the review objectives. Result: Review revealed that cultural adaptation followed similar steps with few variations. There was huge variation in study design, sampling technique & sample size. Cronbach’s alpha & test-retest reliability was mostly used form of reliability with variations in assessment of validity. Exploratory Factor Analysis was used more for statistical analysis & followed similar criteria with few variations. Conclusion: Cross cultural measurement of health outcomes is really an important and challenging issue that needs elaborative guideline to take appropriate steps to solve problems.
跨文化适应与研究工具的心理测量验证:方法学回顾
背景:心理测量学具有非常重要的作用,随着跨文化研究项目的增加,有必要调整量表来测量健康状况。目的:根据最近的实践,对验证过程进行全面描述,并概述验证研究的实用指南。方法:检索PubMed、PubMed Central和谷歌Scholar,检索关键词时间为2000年1月至2015年12月。最后选择78篇文章进行综述,并根据综述目标进行方法学综述。结果:回顾发现,文化适应遵循相似的步骤,几乎没有变化。在研究设计、抽样技术和样本量方面存在巨大差异。信度评估主要采用Cronbach 's alpha & test-retest信度的变异信度形式。探索性因子分析更多地用于统计分析,遵循相似的标准,变化很少。结论:健康结果的跨文化测量确实是一个重要而具有挑战性的问题,需要详细的指导方针来采取适当的步骤来解决问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信