Development and Validation of the Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS) Version 5 Containing Multiple 1D Muscles for Estimating Occupant Motions with Muscle Activation During Side Impacts.
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS) Version 5 Containing Multiple 1D Muscles for Estimating Occupant Motions with Muscle Activation During Side Impacts.","authors":"M. Iwamoto, Yuko Nakahira","doi":"10.4271/2015-22-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate prediction of occupant head kinematics is critical for better understanding of head/face injury mechanisms in side impacts, especially far-side occupants. In light of the fact that researchers have demonstrated that muscle activations, especially in neck muscles, can affect occupant head kinematics, a human body finite element (FE) model that considers muscle activation is useful for predicting occupant head kinematics in real-world automotive accidents. In this study, we developed a human body FE model called the THUMS (Total HUman Model for Safety) Version 5 that contains 262 one-dimensional (1D) Hill-type muscle models over the entire body. The THUMS was validated against 36 series of PMHS (Post Mortem Human Surrogate) and volunteer test data in this study, and 16 series of PMHS and volunteer test data on side impacts are presented. Validation results with force-time curves were also evaluated quantitatively using the CORA (CORrelation and Analysis) method. The validation results suggest that the THUMS has good biofidelity in the responses of the regional or full body for side impacts, but relatively poor biofidelity in its local level of responses such as brain displacements. Occupant kinematics predicted by the THUMS with a muscle controller using 22 PID (Proportional-Integral- Derivative) controllers were compared with those of volunteer test data on low-speed lateral impacts. The THUMS with muscle controller reproduced the head kinematics of the volunteer data more accurately than that without muscle activation, although further studies on validation of torso kinematics are needed for more accurate predictions of occupant head kinematics.","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"59 1","pages":"53-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-22-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45
Abstract
Accurate prediction of occupant head kinematics is critical for better understanding of head/face injury mechanisms in side impacts, especially far-side occupants. In light of the fact that researchers have demonstrated that muscle activations, especially in neck muscles, can affect occupant head kinematics, a human body finite element (FE) model that considers muscle activation is useful for predicting occupant head kinematics in real-world automotive accidents. In this study, we developed a human body FE model called the THUMS (Total HUman Model for Safety) Version 5 that contains 262 one-dimensional (1D) Hill-type muscle models over the entire body. The THUMS was validated against 36 series of PMHS (Post Mortem Human Surrogate) and volunteer test data in this study, and 16 series of PMHS and volunteer test data on side impacts are presented. Validation results with force-time curves were also evaluated quantitatively using the CORA (CORrelation and Analysis) method. The validation results suggest that the THUMS has good biofidelity in the responses of the regional or full body for side impacts, but relatively poor biofidelity in its local level of responses such as brain displacements. Occupant kinematics predicted by the THUMS with a muscle controller using 22 PID (Proportional-Integral- Derivative) controllers were compared with those of volunteer test data on low-speed lateral impacts. The THUMS with muscle controller reproduced the head kinematics of the volunteer data more accurately than that without muscle activation, although further studies on validation of torso kinematics are needed for more accurate predictions of occupant head kinematics.
准确预测乘员头部运动学对于更好地理解侧面碰撞,特别是远侧乘员的头部/面部损伤机制至关重要。鉴于研究人员已经证明肌肉激活,特别是颈部肌肉的激活,可以影响乘员的头部运动学,因此考虑肌肉激活的人体有限元(FE)模型对于预测实际汽车事故中乘员的头部运动学是有用的。在这项研究中,我们开发了一个名为THUMS (Total human model for Safety)第5版的人体有限元模型,其中包含262个覆盖整个身体的一维(1D) hill型肌肉模型。在本研究中,THUMS与36个系列的PMHS (Post Mortem Human Surrogate)和志愿者测试数据进行了验证,并提供了16个系列的PMHS和志愿者测试数据。采用相关分析(CORA)方法对力-时间曲线的验证结果进行定量评价。验证结果表明,THUMS在局部或全身对副作用的反应中具有良好的生物保真度,但在局部水平(如脑位移)的反应中具有相对较差的生物保真度。利用22个PID(比例-积分-导数)控制器的肌肉控制器,将THUMS预测的乘员运动学与志愿者低速横向碰撞试验数据进行了比较。带有肌肉控制器的THUMS比没有肌肉激活的THUMS更准确地再现了志愿者的头部运动学数据,尽管需要进一步研究躯干运动学的有效性,以更准确地预测乘员的头部运动学。