{"title":"Residual liberty","authors":"Richard M. Edwards","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v73i4.985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the argument that detainees do not lose their right to liberty under article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights as currently thought. Instead, the article argues that they continue to enjoy a residual liberty which may be relied upon by detainees when challenging aspects of their detention.","PeriodicalId":83211,"journal":{"name":"The Northern Ireland legal quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Northern Ireland legal quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v73i4.985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article presents the argument that detainees do not lose their right to liberty under article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights as currently thought. Instead, the article argues that they continue to enjoy a residual liberty which may be relied upon by detainees when challenging aspects of their detention.