Epidemiological comparison of the first and second wave of COVID-19 Pandemic in Dhaka, Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study among suspected cases.

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Islam, Israk, Jahan
{"title":"Epidemiological comparison of the first and second wave of COVID-19 Pandemic in Dhaka, Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study among suspected cases.","authors":"Islam, Israk, Jahan","doi":"10.5455/jabet.2022.d101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many countries have been seen two wave patterns of reported cases of coronavirus diseases. Still, a limited number of studies compared the epidemiological attributes of the first wave and second wave of coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. This study was carried out to compare the epidemics of two waves in Bangladesh. This observational study data of suspected cases was collected from June 2020 to April 2021 from a local authorized diagnostic center. From June 27, 2020, to July 27, 2020, was considered as the first wave and from March 20, 2021, to April 20, 2021, was considered a second wave. This period was determined because of observing the highest number of positive cases during that period. Out of 21,359 cases, including 2429 (11.37%) individuals in the first wave and 4989 (23.36%) individuals in the second wave had RT-PCR test for disease confirmation. Among them, 315 people in the first wave and 630 in the second wave were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Male were more vernalized to the positive case, including 204 (64.8%) and 421 (66.8%) during the first and second waves, respectively. People under 41 found 56.2% positive cases during the first wave while it was 65.6% in the second wave. We also found 128 positive cases among international travelers. In conclusion, a large extent of different epidemiological attributes was found in the second wave compared to the first wave of the outbreaks.","PeriodicalId":36275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jabet.2022.d101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Many countries have been seen two wave patterns of reported cases of coronavirus diseases. Still, a limited number of studies compared the epidemiological attributes of the first wave and second wave of coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. This study was carried out to compare the epidemics of two waves in Bangladesh. This observational study data of suspected cases was collected from June 2020 to April 2021 from a local authorized diagnostic center. From June 27, 2020, to July 27, 2020, was considered as the first wave and from March 20, 2021, to April 20, 2021, was considered a second wave. This period was determined because of observing the highest number of positive cases during that period. Out of 21,359 cases, including 2429 (11.37%) individuals in the first wave and 4989 (23.36%) individuals in the second wave had RT-PCR test for disease confirmation. Among them, 315 people in the first wave and 630 in the second wave were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Male were more vernalized to the positive case, including 204 (64.8%) and 421 (66.8%) during the first and second waves, respectively. People under 41 found 56.2% positive cases during the first wave while it was 65.6% in the second wave. We also found 128 positive cases among international travelers. In conclusion, a large extent of different epidemiological attributes was found in the second wave compared to the first wave of the outbreaks.
孟加拉国达卡第一波和第二波COVID-19大流行的流行病学比较:疑似病例的横断面研究
许多国家报告的冠状病毒病例出现了两波模式。尽管如此,有限数量的研究比较了2019年第一波和第二波冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)爆发的流行病学特征。进行这项研究是为了比较孟加拉国两波流行。疑似病例的观察性研究数据于2020年6月至2021年4月从当地授权诊断中心收集。从2020年6月27日到2020年7月27日被认为是第一波,从2021年3月20日到2021年4月20日被认为是第二波。之所以确定这一时期,是因为在这一时期观察到的阳性病例数量最多。在21359例病例中,第一波2429例(11.37%),第二波4989例(23.36%)进行了RT-PCR确诊。其中,第一波315人、第二波630人的SARS-CoV-2 RNA阳性。阳性病例以男性春化为主,第一波和第二波分别有204例(64.8%)和421例(66.8%)。41岁以下人群在第一波中阳性病例占56.2%,在第二波中阳性病例占65.6%。我们还在国际旅行者中发现了128例阳性病例。总之,与第一波暴发相比,在第二波暴发中发现了很大程度上不同的流行病学属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics
Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信