Factors Causing Mothers to Shake Their Babies Between 1-4 Months: A Descriptive Study

Q4 Medicine
Ç. Erdoğan, S. Ceylan, T. Turan
{"title":"Factors Causing Mothers to Shake Their Babies Between 1-4 Months: A Descriptive Study","authors":"Ç. Erdoğan, S. Ceylan, T. Turan","doi":"10.5336/pediatr.2021-85891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The first months after birth is a very difficult period for mothers who are trying to get used to their baby. In particular, it can be even more difficult for mothers with frequent crying babies. The aim of this study is to determine the factors that may cause shaking and shaking of babies aged 1-4 months by their mothers. Material and Methods: A total of 180 mothers were included in our descriptive and cross-sectional study. Research data were compiled using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale, the Fragile Infant Scale, and the mother and infant descriptive characteristics form. Results: When the variables of mothers and babies and the state of being shaken by their mothers were examined, it was seen that none of the variables were effective. In addition, the frequency of swinging during the day was 5.3±3.2, the frequency of rocking to sleep was 5.7±3.8, the frequency of swinging in the car was 2.9±2.8, and the frequency of playing the game of being thrown into the air was 3.4±3.3. Babies with a high frequency of crying shake about 1.5 times more than babies who do not cry. The mothers' mean depression scores were found to be 12.1±7, and the fragile infant perception mean score was 31.9±5.3. In the correlation analysis, no statistically significant relationship was found between mothers' depression scale score and fragile baby perception scale score and shaking their babies. The first three practices preferred by the mothers when their babies started to cry were shaking (66.6%), breastfeeding/feeding (63.8%) and pacifier (23.3%), respectively. It was determined that the first three practices preferred by the mothers when the babies continued to cry were shaking (61.1%), breastfeeding/ feeding (58.3%), and playing the throwing game (53.8%), respectively. Conclusion: The results of our study showed that the babies of the mothers included in the study had a low risk for shaken baby syndrome, especially in this period when abuse against children increased with the restrictions that came to the fore in the coronavirus disease-2019 epidemic. Copyright © 2022 by Türkiye Klinikleri.","PeriodicalId":39104,"journal":{"name":"Turkiye Klinikleri Pediatri","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkiye Klinikleri Pediatri","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5336/pediatr.2021-85891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The first months after birth is a very difficult period for mothers who are trying to get used to their baby. In particular, it can be even more difficult for mothers with frequent crying babies. The aim of this study is to determine the factors that may cause shaking and shaking of babies aged 1-4 months by their mothers. Material and Methods: A total of 180 mothers were included in our descriptive and cross-sectional study. Research data were compiled using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale, the Fragile Infant Scale, and the mother and infant descriptive characteristics form. Results: When the variables of mothers and babies and the state of being shaken by their mothers were examined, it was seen that none of the variables were effective. In addition, the frequency of swinging during the day was 5.3±3.2, the frequency of rocking to sleep was 5.7±3.8, the frequency of swinging in the car was 2.9±2.8, and the frequency of playing the game of being thrown into the air was 3.4±3.3. Babies with a high frequency of crying shake about 1.5 times more than babies who do not cry. The mothers' mean depression scores were found to be 12.1±7, and the fragile infant perception mean score was 31.9±5.3. In the correlation analysis, no statistically significant relationship was found between mothers' depression scale score and fragile baby perception scale score and shaking their babies. The first three practices preferred by the mothers when their babies started to cry were shaking (66.6%), breastfeeding/feeding (63.8%) and pacifier (23.3%), respectively. It was determined that the first three practices preferred by the mothers when the babies continued to cry were shaking (61.1%), breastfeeding/ feeding (58.3%), and playing the throwing game (53.8%), respectively. Conclusion: The results of our study showed that the babies of the mothers included in the study had a low risk for shaken baby syndrome, especially in this period when abuse against children increased with the restrictions that came to the fore in the coronavirus disease-2019 epidemic. Copyright © 2022 by Türkiye Klinikleri.
导致母亲在1-4个月之间摇晃婴儿的因素:一项描述性研究
目的:出生后的第一个月是一个非常困难的时期,母亲试图适应他们的孩子。特别是,对于经常哭闹的婴儿的母亲来说,这可能更加困难。本研究的目的是确定可能导致母亲对1-4个月大的婴儿摇晃和摇晃的因素。材料和方法:我们的描述性和横断面研究共纳入了180名母亲。研究数据采用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表、脆弱婴儿量表和母婴描述性特征表进行编制。结果:在对母婴变量和被妈妈摇的状态进行检验时,发现所有变量都无效。此外,白天摇摆频率为5.3±3.2次,摇晃入睡频率为5.7±3.8次,在车上摇摆频率为2.9±2.8次,玩被抛向空中的游戏频率为3.4±3.3次。哭闹频率高的婴儿比不哭闹的婴儿摇晃的次数多1.5倍。母亲抑郁平均得分为12.1±7分,脆弱婴儿感知平均得分为31.9±5.3分。在相关分析中,母亲抑郁量表得分和脆弱婴儿感知量表得分与摇晃婴儿没有统计学意义。当婴儿开始哭泣时,母亲最喜欢的前三种方式分别是摇晃(66.6%)、母乳喂养(63.8%)和安抚(23.3%)。当婴儿继续哭泣时,母亲最喜欢的前三种行为分别是摇晃(61.1%)、母乳喂养(58.3%)和玩投掷游戏(53.8%)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,研究中母亲的婴儿患摇晃婴儿综合征的风险较低,特别是在2019冠状病毒病流行期间,随着限制措施的出现,对儿童的虐待有所增加。版权所有©2022由 rkiye Klinikleri。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkiye Klinikleri Pediatri
Turkiye Klinikleri Pediatri Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信