SYSTEMATICS OF BROMELIOIDEAE (BROMELIACEAE)¯EVIDENCE FROM MOLECULAR AND ANATOMICAL STUDIES

Aliso Pub Date : 2007-01-01 DOI:10.5642/ALISO.20072301.05
R. Horres, K. Schulte, K. Weising, G. Zizka
{"title":"SYSTEMATICS OF BROMELIOIDEAE (BROMELIACEAE)¯EVIDENCE FROM MOLECULAR AND ANATOMICAL STUDIES","authors":"R. Horres, K. Schulte, K. Weising, G. Zizka","doi":"10.5642/ALISO.20072301.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A reconstruction of the phylogeny of Bromeliaceae based on sequence data from three noncoding chloroplast DNA markers (trnL intron, trnT-trnL, and trnT-trnF intergenic spacer [IGS]) is presented, including 26 genera and 33 species. Relationships of Bromelioideae and phylogeny within this subfamily were analyzed in more detail on the basis of two of these markers (trnL intron and trnL-trnF IGS) using a set of 37 genera/74 species of Bromeliaceae, including 28 genera/60 species of Bromelioideae. Sister group relationships of Bromelioideae were not resolved with sufficient reliability, but the most likely candidates are the genera Fosterella and Puya. The basal phylogeny of Bromelioideae also was not resolved. Greigia, Ochagavia/Fascicularia/Fernseea, Deinacanthon, Bromelia, and a \"core group\" of the remaining Bromelioideae formed a basal polytomy. Within Bromelioideae, the AFLP technique was applied to assess relationships among selected groups of genera. In the Ochagavia/Fascicularia group (5 species and subspecies/16 accessions), AFLP data fully confirmed the systematic relationships based on morphological and anatomical characters. Investigation of 30 Aechmea species (33 accessions), including all subgenera and one species each from the related genera Ursulaea, Portea, Chevaliera, and Streptocalyx produced no resolution for several of the species. Clades that received good bootstrap support generally did not correspond with the delimitation of subgenera of Aechmea. Additionally, leaf blade anatomy of these species was investigated. The results corresponded partly with those of the AFLP analysis. Generic rank for Ursulaea and Portea was not supported.","PeriodicalId":80410,"journal":{"name":"Aliso","volume":"23 1","pages":"27-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aliso","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5642/ALISO.20072301.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

Abstract

A reconstruction of the phylogeny of Bromeliaceae based on sequence data from three noncoding chloroplast DNA markers (trnL intron, trnT-trnL, and trnT-trnF intergenic spacer [IGS]) is presented, including 26 genera and 33 species. Relationships of Bromelioideae and phylogeny within this subfamily were analyzed in more detail on the basis of two of these markers (trnL intron and trnL-trnF IGS) using a set of 37 genera/74 species of Bromeliaceae, including 28 genera/60 species of Bromelioideae. Sister group relationships of Bromelioideae were not resolved with sufficient reliability, but the most likely candidates are the genera Fosterella and Puya. The basal phylogeny of Bromelioideae also was not resolved. Greigia, Ochagavia/Fascicularia/Fernseea, Deinacanthon, Bromelia, and a "core group" of the remaining Bromelioideae formed a basal polytomy. Within Bromelioideae, the AFLP technique was applied to assess relationships among selected groups of genera. In the Ochagavia/Fascicularia group (5 species and subspecies/16 accessions), AFLP data fully confirmed the systematic relationships based on morphological and anatomical characters. Investigation of 30 Aechmea species (33 accessions), including all subgenera and one species each from the related genera Ursulaea, Portea, Chevaliera, and Streptocalyx produced no resolution for several of the species. Clades that received good bootstrap support generally did not correspond with the delimitation of subgenera of Aechmea. Additionally, leaf blade anatomy of these species was investigated. The results corresponded partly with those of the AFLP analysis. Generic rank for Ursulaea and Portea was not supported.
凤梨科的系统学——来自分子和解剖学研究的证据
基于3个非编码叶绿体DNA标记(trnL内含子、trnT-trnL和trnT-trnF基因间间隔[IGS])的序列数据,对凤梨科植物26属33种的系统发育进行了重建。基于trnL内含子和trnL- trnf IGS这两个标记,以菠萝科植物37属/74种(其中菠萝科28属/60种)为研究对象,详细分析了该亚科植物间的亲缘关系及其系统发育。凤梨科姊妹类群关系尚不确定,但最有可能的是Fosterella属和Puya属。凤梨科的基础系统发育也没有得到解决。Greigia、Ochagavia/Fascicularia/Fernseea、Deinacanthon、Bromelia和剩余的bromelioidea的一个“核心群”形成了一个基底多裂。在凤梨科中,采用AFLP技术评价了所选属群之间的亲缘关系。在Ochagavia/Fascicularia类群(5种和亚种/16份资料)中,AFLP数据充分证实了基于形态和解剖特征的系统关系。对33份30种Aechmea属(包括所有亚属)进行了调查,其中Ursulaea、Portea、Chevaliera和Streptocalyx属各1种。得到良好引导支持的支系一般不符合Aechmea亚属的划分。此外,还对这些植物的叶片进行了解剖研究。结果与AFLP分析结果部分吻合。不支持ursullaea和Portea的通用等级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信