{"title":"symposium on The Crucible","authors":"T. Greenfield, M. Marino, David Palmer","doi":"10.5325/arthmillj.11.2.0200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The CrucibleWalter Kerr Theatre13 March-17 July 2016Directed by Ivo van Hove[Editor's Note: While The Crucible might be considered one of Miller's closer brushes with realism, despite its realistic veneer, it was also deceptively inventive for its time. His earlier, equally realistic All My Sons has withstood several forays against its apparent realism with varying success, largely dependent on the cohesive vision of the director. Belgian experimentalist Ivo van Hove's highly anticipated Broadway revival of The Crucible featured innovative staging and costuming, as well as a superb ensemble cast, that pleased plenty, but left others feeling somewhat cheated. Some, in this case Thomas Greenfield and Molly Marino, felt that van Hove's interpretation was too limited and failed to render an articulate visual or aural statement; while David Palmer was more willing to view van Hove's attempted vision in a more positive light, as an insightful but dark commentary on the disturbing vagaries of our current society. The following reviews offer a variety of responses to this landmark production. It should be noted that whether one loved or hated it, the excitement that has surrounded The Crucible on the heels of van Hove's A View from the Bridge (a production on which the majority of critics were more agreed regarding its excellence) has done much to make Miller one of the most feted playwrights on Broadway at the start of the twenty-first century, and past his centennial celebrations. This should offer encouragement for other renowned directors and theater companies to try their hand. Thus, we can look forward to even more exciting productions of Miller's work in the years to come.-Susan C. W. AbbotsonPerformance Review Editor]The CrucibleWalter Kerr TheatreNew York, NY31 March-17 July 2016Directed by Ivo van HoveREVIEWED BY THOMAS GREENFIELD, SUNY GENESEOSince his death in 2005 Arthur Miller has had five Broadway opening nights: All My Sons (2008), A View from the Bridge (2010), Death of a Salesman (2012), A View from the Bridge again (2015), and The Crucible, which opened in March 2016. The two most recent productions were directed by Ivo van Hove, the heralded Belgian avant-garde experimentalist and \"Broadway's Man of the Moment\" (Marks). If one views past as prologue, van Hove and his \"moment\" are something of a mismatch considering how infrequently Miller's plays are staged as avant-garde pieces. Van Hove certainly understands this disconnect between Miller and himself, admitting as recently as 2014, \"I'm not such a fan of Arthur Miller . . . often his plays are ethical, you know? Good against evil . . . I am not so interested in good and evil\" (Dickson). For better and worse, that disconnect is evident in van Hove's Broadway revival of The Crucible.Van Hove made his reputation in Europe and the United States by radically reimagining traditional dramatic pieces. (The word \"reimagining\" frequently appears in discussions of van Hove's productions.) True to his word and his buzz, van Hove served notice as he embarked on his Broadway stagings of A View from the Bridge and The Crucible: \"When I do a play I want to do it in the most extreme way possible\" (Dickson). Van Hove's forceful staging of A View from the Bridge left its intended impression on New York audiences and critics. In fruitful collaboration with scenic designer Jan Versweyveld, van Hove relocated the Carbones' Brooklyn-by-the-docks living room to an undefined minimalist space that might have well served an updated production of Sartre's No Exit. Yet given that Miller himself wanted the play and the set \"stripped of everything but its essential elements\" (Huftel 146), van Hove's Bridge was not a bridge too far.Van Hove's staging of The Crucible is another matter. Any reimagining of The Crucible contends with the inescapable fact that, unlike A View from the Bridge, The Crucible is itself a reimagining of something else-twice. …","PeriodicalId":40151,"journal":{"name":"Arthur Miller Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthur Miller Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/arthmillj.11.2.0200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The CrucibleWalter Kerr Theatre13 March-17 July 2016Directed by Ivo van Hove[Editor's Note: While The Crucible might be considered one of Miller's closer brushes with realism, despite its realistic veneer, it was also deceptively inventive for its time. His earlier, equally realistic All My Sons has withstood several forays against its apparent realism with varying success, largely dependent on the cohesive vision of the director. Belgian experimentalist Ivo van Hove's highly anticipated Broadway revival of The Crucible featured innovative staging and costuming, as well as a superb ensemble cast, that pleased plenty, but left others feeling somewhat cheated. Some, in this case Thomas Greenfield and Molly Marino, felt that van Hove's interpretation was too limited and failed to render an articulate visual or aural statement; while David Palmer was more willing to view van Hove's attempted vision in a more positive light, as an insightful but dark commentary on the disturbing vagaries of our current society. The following reviews offer a variety of responses to this landmark production. It should be noted that whether one loved or hated it, the excitement that has surrounded The Crucible on the heels of van Hove's A View from the Bridge (a production on which the majority of critics were more agreed regarding its excellence) has done much to make Miller one of the most feted playwrights on Broadway at the start of the twenty-first century, and past his centennial celebrations. This should offer encouragement for other renowned directors and theater companies to try their hand. Thus, we can look forward to even more exciting productions of Miller's work in the years to come.-Susan C. W. AbbotsonPerformance Review Editor]The CrucibleWalter Kerr TheatreNew York, NY31 March-17 July 2016Directed by Ivo van HoveREVIEWED BY THOMAS GREENFIELD, SUNY GENESEOSince his death in 2005 Arthur Miller has had five Broadway opening nights: All My Sons (2008), A View from the Bridge (2010), Death of a Salesman (2012), A View from the Bridge again (2015), and The Crucible, which opened in March 2016. The two most recent productions were directed by Ivo van Hove, the heralded Belgian avant-garde experimentalist and "Broadway's Man of the Moment" (Marks). If one views past as prologue, van Hove and his "moment" are something of a mismatch considering how infrequently Miller's plays are staged as avant-garde pieces. Van Hove certainly understands this disconnect between Miller and himself, admitting as recently as 2014, "I'm not such a fan of Arthur Miller . . . often his plays are ethical, you know? Good against evil . . . I am not so interested in good and evil" (Dickson). For better and worse, that disconnect is evident in van Hove's Broadway revival of The Crucible.Van Hove made his reputation in Europe and the United States by radically reimagining traditional dramatic pieces. (The word "reimagining" frequently appears in discussions of van Hove's productions.) True to his word and his buzz, van Hove served notice as he embarked on his Broadway stagings of A View from the Bridge and The Crucible: "When I do a play I want to do it in the most extreme way possible" (Dickson). Van Hove's forceful staging of A View from the Bridge left its intended impression on New York audiences and critics. In fruitful collaboration with scenic designer Jan Versweyveld, van Hove relocated the Carbones' Brooklyn-by-the-docks living room to an undefined minimalist space that might have well served an updated production of Sartre's No Exit. Yet given that Miller himself wanted the play and the set "stripped of everything but its essential elements" (Huftel 146), van Hove's Bridge was not a bridge too far.Van Hove's staging of The Crucible is another matter. Any reimagining of The Crucible contends with the inescapable fact that, unlike A View from the Bridge, The Crucible is itself a reimagining of something else-twice. …
《坩埚》导演:伊沃·范·霍夫编者按:虽然《坩埚》可能被认为是米勒最接近现实主义的作品之一,但尽管它表面上是现实主义的,但在那个时代,它也具有欺骗性的创造性。他早期同样现实主义的《我的儿子们》经受住了几次反对其明显现实主义的尝试,并取得了不同程度的成功,这在很大程度上取决于导演的凝聚力。比利时实验主义者伊沃·范·霍夫(Ivo van Hove)备受期待的百老汇版《坩埚》(The Crucible)以创新的舞台和服装,以及一流的演员阵容为特色,让很多人满意,但也让其他人感到有些受骗。有些人,比如托马斯·格林菲尔德(Thomas Greenfield)和莫利·马里诺(Molly Marino),认为范·霍夫的解释太过有限,未能呈现出清晰的视觉或听觉陈述;而大卫·帕尔默则更愿意从更积极的角度来看待范·霍夫的设想,认为这是对我们当前社会令人不安的变幻莫测的深刻而黑暗的评论。以下评论提供了对这部里程碑式作品的各种回应。值得注意的是,不管你是喜欢还是讨厌它,《坩埚》紧随凡·霍夫的《桥上的风景》(大多数评论家对这部作品的评价更为一致,认为它非常出色)之后所引发的兴奋,在很大程度上使米勒成为了21世纪初百老汇最受欢迎的剧作家之一,并度过了他的百年庆典。这应该会鼓励其他知名导演和戏剧公司尝试一下。因此,我们可以期待米勒的作品在未来几年更令人兴奋的作品。-Susan C. W. abbotson沃尔特·科尔剧院纽约,2016年3月31日- 7月17日导演:Ivo van hover2005年去世后,阿瑟·米勒在百老汇上演了五场首演:《我的儿子们》(2008年)、《桥上的风景》(2010年)、《推销员之死》(2012年)、《再一次桥上的风景》(2015年)和2016年3月开幕的《坩埚》。最近的两部作品由伊沃·范·霍夫(Ivo van Hove)执导,他是比利时先锋派实验主义者,也是“百老汇的风云人物”(Marks)。如果把过去看作是序幕,那么考虑到米勒的戏剧很少作为先锋派作品上演,范霍夫和他的“时刻”就有点不匹配了。范霍夫当然理解米勒和他自己之间的这种脱节,就在2014年,他承认:“我不是亚瑟·米勒的粉丝……他的戏剧通常都很道德,你知道吗?正义对抗邪恶……我对善与恶不太感兴趣”(迪克森)。不管是好是坏,这种脱节在范霍夫在百老汇重新上演的《坩埚》中表现得很明显。范霍夫通过对传统戏剧作品进行彻底的重新构想,在欧洲和美国赢得了声誉。(“重新想象”这个词经常出现在对范霍夫作品的讨论中。)凡·霍夫言出必行,当他开始在百老汇上演《桥上的景色》和《坩埚》时,他引起了人们的注意:“当我演一部戏时,我想用最极端的方式来演它”(迪克森)。范霍夫对《桥上的风景》的强势演绎给纽约的观众和评论家留下了预期的印象。在与风景设计师Jan Versweyveld富有成效的合作中,van Hove将carbone家位于布鲁克林码头边的客厅重新安置到一个未定义的极简主义空间,这个空间可能很好地服务于萨特的“无出口”的更新生产。然而,考虑到米勒本人希望剧本和布景“除去一切,只保留其基本元素”(Huftel 146),范霍夫的《桥》并不是一座过份的桥。范霍夫的《坩埚》是另一回事。任何对《坩埚》的重新想象都要面对一个不可避免的事实:与《桥上的风景》不同,《坩埚》本身就是对其他事物的重新想象——而且是两次。…