The Neoliberal Turn in Environmental Regulation

Jason J. Czarnezki, K. Fiedler
{"title":"The Neoliberal Turn in Environmental Regulation","authors":"Jason J. Czarnezki, K. Fiedler","doi":"10.5072/ULR.V2016I1.2030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulation has taken a neoliberal turn, using market-based mechanisms to achieve social benefits, especially in the context of environmental protection, and promoting information dissemination, labeling, and advertising to influence consumer preferences. Although this turn to neoliberal environmental regulation is well under way, there have been few attempts to manage this new reality. Instead, most commentators simply applaud or criticize the turn. If relying on neoliberal environmental reform (i.e., facing this reality regardless of one’s view of this turn), regulation and checks on these reforms are required. This Article argues that in light of the shift from traditional to neoliberal “substantive” environmental regulation, “procedural” checks are required through regulation and legislation to improve the quality of the market-based and informational neoliberal approaches, including oversight via regulation that ensures accuracy in valuation of natural resources, increases and improves the quality of the information provided by consumers, and requires greater accountability and accuracy from institutions making green claims to consumers.","PeriodicalId":83442,"journal":{"name":"Utah law review","volume":"2016 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utah law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5072/ULR.V2016I1.2030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Regulation has taken a neoliberal turn, using market-based mechanisms to achieve social benefits, especially in the context of environmental protection, and promoting information dissemination, labeling, and advertising to influence consumer preferences. Although this turn to neoliberal environmental regulation is well under way, there have been few attempts to manage this new reality. Instead, most commentators simply applaud or criticize the turn. If relying on neoliberal environmental reform (i.e., facing this reality regardless of one’s view of this turn), regulation and checks on these reforms are required. This Article argues that in light of the shift from traditional to neoliberal “substantive” environmental regulation, “procedural” checks are required through regulation and legislation to improve the quality of the market-based and informational neoliberal approaches, including oversight via regulation that ensures accuracy in valuation of natural resources, increases and improves the quality of the information provided by consumers, and requires greater accountability and accuracy from institutions making green claims to consumers.
环境监管的新自由主义转向
监管已经转向新自由主义,利用基于市场的机制来实现社会效益,特别是在环境保护的背景下,并促进信息传播、标签和广告来影响消费者的偏好。虽然这种向新自由主义环境监管的转变正在顺利进行,但很少有人尝试管理这一新的现实。相反,大多数评论人士只是称赞或批评这一转变。如果依赖于新自由主义的环境改革(即,面对这一现实,不管一个人对这一转变的看法如何),就需要对这些改革进行监管和检查。本文认为,鉴于从传统的“实质性”环境监管向新自由主义的转变,需要通过监管和立法进行“程序性”检查,以提高基于市场和信息的新自由主义方法的质量,包括通过监管来确保自然资源估值的准确性,增加和改善消费者提供的信息的质量。并要求向消费者做出绿色声明的机构承担更大的责任,提高其准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信