Treatment of myasthenia gravis

K. V. Toyka, R. Gold, K. V. Toyka
{"title":"Treatment of myasthenia gravis","authors":"K. V. Toyka, R. Gold, K. V. Toyka","doi":"10.4414/sanp.2007.01882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Myasthenia gravis is a prototypic antibody-mediated neurological autoimmune disorder. Its pathogenesis is much better understood than that of multiple sclerosis or immune neuropathies. Currently two targets in the endplate membrane are considered as autoantigens, the acetylcholine receptor (in up to 90%) and the muscle-specific kinase (MuSK, in about 5%). Fortunately, substantial therapeutic progress has been made even before the era of molecular and translational medicine. In this review we characterise modern treatment algorithms that are adapted to disease severity and introduce the principle of escalating treatment strategies for myasthenia gravis. In mild cases and ocular forms of myasthenia gravis treatment with acetylcholine esterase inhibitors may be sufficient, at least temporarily. In generalised myasthenia gravis a wide array of immunosuppressive treatments have been established but most have never been tested in a full-size prospective randomised trial. Up to 10% of patients with myasthenia gravis are associated with a thymoma, i.e. of paraneoplastic origin, and this has to be looked for by CAT scan or MRI. In non-thymoma patients younger than about 50 years of age and with generalised weakness a complete early (but not urgent) thymectomy is considered as state of the art based on circumstantial evidence and expert opinion; the best type of procedure is still under debate. Usually, pretreatment with immunosuppressive medication or plasma-pheresis is recommended. Myasthenic crisis is best treated by plasma-pheresis, mostly combined with immunoadsorption techniques. Intravenous immunoglobulins are a reasonable therapeutic alternative, but a shortage in supply and high prices limit its use. With regard to immunosuppression azathioprine is still the standard base-line treatment, often combined with initial corticosteroids. In rare patients with inborn hepatic enzyme deficiency of thiomethylation azathioprine it is not well tolerated and may be substituted by mycophenolate mofetil. Severe cases may profit from combined immunosuppression with corticosteroids, cyclosporine A and even moderate doses of methotrexate or cyclophosphamide. Tacrolimus is under investigation. All such combination therapies need to be supervised by an experienced academic neuroimmunological centre. Serial measurements of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies, once these are elevated, or MuSK antibodies are a useful adjunct for monitoring treatment success. In escalating therapy for very severe cases one may employ monoclonal anti-CD 20 antibodies (rituximab). In highly refractory cases also immunoablation via high-dose cyclophosphamide, followed by trophic factors such as G-CSF has been suggested.","PeriodicalId":76385,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrie, Neurologie, und medizinische Psychologie","volume":"158 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrie, Neurologie, und medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4414/sanp.2007.01882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Myasthenia gravis is a prototypic antibody-mediated neurological autoimmune disorder. Its pathogenesis is much better understood than that of multiple sclerosis or immune neuropathies. Currently two targets in the endplate membrane are considered as autoantigens, the acetylcholine receptor (in up to 90%) and the muscle-specific kinase (MuSK, in about 5%). Fortunately, substantial therapeutic progress has been made even before the era of molecular and translational medicine. In this review we characterise modern treatment algorithms that are adapted to disease severity and introduce the principle of escalating treatment strategies for myasthenia gravis. In mild cases and ocular forms of myasthenia gravis treatment with acetylcholine esterase inhibitors may be sufficient, at least temporarily. In generalised myasthenia gravis a wide array of immunosuppressive treatments have been established but most have never been tested in a full-size prospective randomised trial. Up to 10% of patients with myasthenia gravis are associated with a thymoma, i.e. of paraneoplastic origin, and this has to be looked for by CAT scan or MRI. In non-thymoma patients younger than about 50 years of age and with generalised weakness a complete early (but not urgent) thymectomy is considered as state of the art based on circumstantial evidence and expert opinion; the best type of procedure is still under debate. Usually, pretreatment with immunosuppressive medication or plasma-pheresis is recommended. Myasthenic crisis is best treated by plasma-pheresis, mostly combined with immunoadsorption techniques. Intravenous immunoglobulins are a reasonable therapeutic alternative, but a shortage in supply and high prices limit its use. With regard to immunosuppression azathioprine is still the standard base-line treatment, often combined with initial corticosteroids. In rare patients with inborn hepatic enzyme deficiency of thiomethylation azathioprine it is not well tolerated and may be substituted by mycophenolate mofetil. Severe cases may profit from combined immunosuppression with corticosteroids, cyclosporine A and even moderate doses of methotrexate or cyclophosphamide. Tacrolimus is under investigation. All such combination therapies need to be supervised by an experienced academic neuroimmunological centre. Serial measurements of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies, once these are elevated, or MuSK antibodies are a useful adjunct for monitoring treatment success. In escalating therapy for very severe cases one may employ monoclonal anti-CD 20 antibodies (rituximab). In highly refractory cases also immunoablation via high-dose cyclophosphamide, followed by trophic factors such as G-CSF has been suggested.
重症肌无力的治疗
重症肌无力是一种典型的抗体介导的神经自身免疫性疾病。其发病机制比多发性硬化症或免疫神经病变更容易理解。目前,终板膜上的两个靶点被认为是自身抗原,乙酰胆碱受体(高达90%)和肌肉特异性激酶(MuSK,约5%)。幸运的是,甚至在分子医学和转化医学时代之前,就已经取得了实质性的治疗进展。在这篇综述中,我们描述了适应疾病严重程度的现代治疗算法,并介绍了重症肌无力的升级治疗策略原则。在轻度病例和眼部形式的重症肌无力,用乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂治疗可能是足够的,至少暂时的。在广泛性重症肌无力中,已经建立了广泛的免疫抑制治疗方法,但大多数从未在全尺寸前瞻性随机试验中进行过测试。高达10%的重症肌无力患者伴有胸腺瘤,即副肿瘤起源,这必须通过CAT扫描或MRI来寻找。在年龄小于50岁且全身虚弱的非胸腺瘤患者中,基于间接证据和专家意见,早期(但不紧急)完全胸腺切除术被认为是最先进的;最好的手术类型仍在争论中。通常,建议使用免疫抑制药物或血浆采血进行预处理。肌无力危象最好的治疗方法是血浆置换,通常与免疫吸附技术相结合。静脉注射免疫球蛋白是一种合理的治疗选择,但供应短缺和高昂的价格限制了它的使用。关于免疫抑制,硫唑嘌呤仍然是标准的基线治疗,通常与初始皮质类固醇联合使用。在罕见的先天性肝酶缺乏症患者中,硫甲基硫唑嘌呤耐受性不佳,可由霉酚酸酯代替。重症患者可联合使用皮质类固醇、环孢素A、甚至中等剂量的甲氨蝶呤或环磷酰胺进行免疫抑制治疗。他克莫司正在接受调查。所有这些联合疗法都需要由经验丰富的学术神经免疫学中心进行监督。连续测量抗乙酰胆碱受体抗体,一旦这些抗体升高,或MuSK抗体是监测治疗成功的有用辅助手段。在升级治疗非常严重的情况下,可以使用单克隆抗cd20抗体(利妥昔单抗)。在高度难治性病例中,建议采用高剂量环磷酰胺免疫消融术,然后使用G-CSF等营养因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信