Evaluation of Percutaneous Unilateral Kyphoplasty Results in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Using Individual 3D Printed Guide Template Support.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ilker Deniz Cingoz, Gokhan Gurkan, Murat Atar, Inan Uzunoglu, Meryem Cansu Sahin, Safak Ozyoruk, Hakan Tetik, Ismail Kaya
{"title":"Evaluation of Percutaneous Unilateral Kyphoplasty Results in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Using Individual 3D Printed Guide Template Support.","authors":"Ilker Deniz Cingoz, Gokhan Gurkan, Murat Atar, Inan Uzunoglu, Meryem Cansu Sahin, Safak Ozyoruk, Hakan Tetik, Ismail Kaya","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.43052-22.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) surgeries performed using 3D printing technology in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures to conventional unilateral PKP surgeries.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients with acute painful single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) who need surgical treatment were divided into two groups: group A (patients who had 3D template-guided PKP) and group B (patients who conventional PKP). To compare the two surgical procedures, Total Absorbed Radiation Dose (TARD), pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and Total Surgery Time (TST) were calculated and compared between groups in both surgical groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 44 patients with single-level OVCF who were experiencing acute pain were successfully operated on, with 22 patients in each group. TARD (2.6 ± 0.4 mGy vs. 6.1 ± 1.9 mGy, p < 0.05) and TST (12.4 ± 2.6 min vs. 20.2 ± 3.2 min, p < 0.05) differed significantly different between groups A and B. There was no statistically significant difference between the patient groups in preoperative and postoperative VAS values (p > 0.05). Cement leakage was lower in group A (3/22, 13.6%) than in group B (6/22, 27.3%) (p > 0.05). There were no neurological complications or infections in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When compared to the conventional procedure, the unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty method was supported by a 3D printing guide template. By reducing operative time and radiation exposure, tt has resulted in a more effective surgical procedure for patients and a safer surgical procedure for surgeons and anaesthesiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":23395,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"250-255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.43052-22.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) surgeries performed using 3D printing technology in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures to conventional unilateral PKP surgeries.

Material and methods: Patients with acute painful single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) who need surgical treatment were divided into two groups: group A (patients who had 3D template-guided PKP) and group B (patients who conventional PKP). To compare the two surgical procedures, Total Absorbed Radiation Dose (TARD), pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and Total Surgery Time (TST) were calculated and compared between groups in both surgical groups.

Results: A total of 44 patients with single-level OVCF who were experiencing acute pain were successfully operated on, with 22 patients in each group. TARD (2.6 ± 0.4 mGy vs. 6.1 ± 1.9 mGy, p < 0.05) and TST (12.4 ± 2.6 min vs. 20.2 ± 3.2 min, p < 0.05) differed significantly different between groups A and B. There was no statistically significant difference between the patient groups in preoperative and postoperative VAS values (p > 0.05). Cement leakage was lower in group A (3/22, 13.6%) than in group B (6/22, 27.3%) (p > 0.05). There were no neurological complications or infections in either group.

Conclusion: When compared to the conventional procedure, the unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty method was supported by a 3D printing guide template. By reducing operative time and radiation exposure, tt has resulted in a more effective surgical procedure for patients and a safer surgical procedure for surgeons and anaesthesiologists.

评估使用单个 3D 打印导向模板支持对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折进行经皮单侧椎体成形术的效果。
目的:比较骨质疏松性压缩骨折患者使用3D打印技术进行单侧经皮椎体成形术(PKP)手术与传统单侧PKP手术的临床和放射学效果:将需要手术治疗的急性疼痛性单侧骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)患者分为两组:A组(在3D模板引导下进行PKP手术的患者)和B组(进行传统PKP手术的患者)。为了比较两种手术方法,计算并比较了两组的总吸收辐射剂量(TARD)、术前和术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分以及手术总时间(TST):共为 44 名伴有急性疼痛的单水平 OVCF 患者成功实施了手术,每组 22 人。A组和B组的TARD(2.6 ± 0.4 mGy vs. 6.1 ± 1.9 mGy,P < 0.05)和TST(12.4 ± 2.6 min vs. 20.2 ± 3.2 min,P < 0.05)差异显著。A 组的骨水泥渗漏率(3/22,13.6%)低于 B 组(6/22,27.3%)(P > 0.05)。两组均未出现神经系统并发症或感染:结论:与传统手术相比,单侧经皮椎体后凸成形术得到了3D打印引导模板的支持。通过减少手术时间和辐射暴露,3D打印技术为患者带来了更有效的手术方法,也为外科医生和麻醉师带来了更安全的手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish neurosurgery
Turkish neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
126
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Turkish Neurosurgery is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary, open access and totally free journal directed at an audience of neurosurgery physicians and scientists. The official language of the journal is English. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Turkish Neurosurgery will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) approval and have strictly observed an acceptable follow-up period. With the exception of reference presentation, Turkish Neurosurgery requires that all manuscripts be prepared in accordance with the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信