Resection or Biopsy: The Efficacy of Different Surgical Approaches for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yukun Zhang, Zongyue Wang, Dongdong Wang, Bo Yu, Jinkun Wen, Shiwei He, Wei Zeng, Cunzu Wang
{"title":"Resection or Biopsy: The Efficacy of Different Surgical Approaches for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.","authors":"Yukun Zhang, Zongyue Wang, Dongdong Wang, Bo Yu, Jinkun Wen, Shiwei He, Wei Zeng, Cunzu Wang","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.41647-22.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze the efficacy of surgical resection versus brain biopsy combined with postoperative chemotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and to discuss a clinically standardized treatment protocol.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients with a pathological diagnosis of PCNSL and subsequent chemotherapy between 2016 and 2021 at Northern Jiangsu People?s Hospital were selected and divided into groups according to whether they underwent microsurgical resection or stereotactic needle biopsy. Statistical analyses were performed to compare efficacy and safety in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 patients with PCNSL were identified, of whom 12 underwent resection and 9 underwent diagnostic stereotactic biopsy only. Compared with the resection group, the biopsy group had a higher proportion of deep tumors (55.6% vs. 8.3%, p=0.016), and the mean intraoperative bleeding was significantly reduced (13.33 ± 6.61 mL vs. 170.83 ± 101.04 ml, p < 0.001). In addition, the mean survival time of patients who died during the postoperative follow-up period was shorter (6.83 ± 1.60 vs. 18.56 ± 10.20 months, p=0.016), and the one-year survival rate was lower (33.3% vs. 83.3%, p=0.032). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean progression-free survival time or new functional impairment after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For PCNSL, patients who undergo surgical resection have a better outcome than those who undergo biopsy only, suggesting that when the tumor is located at a surgically resectable site, surgical resection should be actively chosen; when the tumor is located at a deep and unresectable site, brain biopsy should be chosen.</p>","PeriodicalId":23395,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"401-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.41647-22.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To analyze the efficacy of surgical resection versus brain biopsy combined with postoperative chemotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and to discuss a clinically standardized treatment protocol.

Material and methods: Patients with a pathological diagnosis of PCNSL and subsequent chemotherapy between 2016 and 2021 at Northern Jiangsu People?s Hospital were selected and divided into groups according to whether they underwent microsurgical resection or stereotactic needle biopsy. Statistical analyses were performed to compare efficacy and safety in the two groups.

Results: A total of 21 patients with PCNSL were identified, of whom 12 underwent resection and 9 underwent diagnostic stereotactic biopsy only. Compared with the resection group, the biopsy group had a higher proportion of deep tumors (55.6% vs. 8.3%, p=0.016), and the mean intraoperative bleeding was significantly reduced (13.33 ± 6.61 mL vs. 170.83 ± 101.04 ml, p < 0.001). In addition, the mean survival time of patients who died during the postoperative follow-up period was shorter (6.83 ± 1.60 vs. 18.56 ± 10.20 months, p=0.016), and the one-year survival rate was lower (33.3% vs. 83.3%, p=0.032). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean progression-free survival time or new functional impairment after surgery.

Conclusion: For PCNSL, patients who undergo surgical resection have a better outcome than those who undergo biopsy only, suggesting that when the tumor is located at a surgically resectable site, surgical resection should be actively chosen; when the tumor is located at a deep and unresectable site, brain biopsy should be chosen.

切除还是活检:不同手术方法对原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的疗效。
摘要] 目的 分析手术切除与脑活检联合术后化疗治疗原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)的疗效,探讨临床标准化治疗方案。方法 选取江苏省人民医院2016年至2021年间病理诊断为PCNSL并随后接受化疗的患者,根据其接受显微外科切除术或立体定向针活检术的情况将其分为几组。对两组患者的疗效和安全性进行统计分析比较。结果 共发现21例PCNSL患者,其中12例接受了切除术,9例仅接受了诊断性立体定向活检。与切除组相比,活检组的深部肿瘤比例更高(55.6% 对 8.3%,P=0.016),术中平均出血量显著减少(13.33 ± 6.61 mL 对 170.83 ± 101.04 mL,P 0.001)。此外,术后随访期间死亡患者的平均生存时间更短(6.83 ± 1.60 对 18.56 ± 10.20 个月,P=0.016),一年生存率更低(33.3% 对 83.3%,P=0.032)。两组患者的平均无进展生存时间和术后新出现的功能障碍无明显差异。结论 对于 PCNSL,接受手术切除的患者比只接受活检的患者有更好的预后,这表明当肿瘤位于可手术切除的部位时,应积极选择手术切除;当肿瘤位于深部且不可切除的部位时,应选择脑活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish neurosurgery
Turkish neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
126
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Turkish Neurosurgery is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary, open access and totally free journal directed at an audience of neurosurgery physicians and scientists. The official language of the journal is English. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Turkish Neurosurgery will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) approval and have strictly observed an acceptable follow-up period. With the exception of reference presentation, Turkish Neurosurgery requires that all manuscripts be prepared in accordance with the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信