Ethical Sensitivity of Physicians in the Discipline of Orthopedics and Traumatology: A Cross-Sectional Study

R. Öztürk, Y. Cırdı, Gülhan Küçük Öztürk
{"title":"Ethical Sensitivity of Physicians in the Discipline of Orthopedics and Traumatology: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"R. Öztürk, Y. Cırdı, Gülhan Küçük Öztürk","doi":"10.5336/mdethic.2021-87085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABS TRACT The present study was conducted to determine the ethi- cal sensitivity of physicians in the discipline of orthopedics and traumatology. The study, conducted between March and April 2020, followed a cross-sectional design and included 234 physicians. Although sampling was not performed, physicians in the discipline of ortho- pedics and traumatology who complied with the selection criteria constituted the sample. Data collection was performed using an online form. Necessary permissions were obtained to conduct the study. The average age of all participants was 37.27±7.92 years. Of the partici- pants, 96.6% were male. Further, 50.5% of the participants were specialist orthopedic physicians and 85.5% were willingly employed. Of the participants, 68.4% stated that they received ethics training during their academic life and 70.9% stated that they received no ethics trai- ning during their professional life. Of the participants, 52.1% stated that they had knowledge about ethics, 62.4% stated that they experien- ced ethical dilemmas and 36.8% stated that they had resolved the ethical dilemma they encountered. The total mean score for physicians in the discipline of orthopedics and traumatology on the Ethical Sensitivity Scale was 89.70±17.00. In addition, ethical sensitivity was higher for physicians who had an academic title and over 5 years of experience in the discipline of orthopedics and traumatology, who were willingly employed, who had received ethics training, and who had independently resolved an ethical dilemma. It is thought that these findings can be used to develop models based on an holistic ethical approach, espe-cially for physicians in the discipline of orthopedics and traumatology.","PeriodicalId":91422,"journal":{"name":"Turkiye klinikleri. Tip etigi-hukuku-tarihi = Turkiye klinikleri journal of medical ethics, law, and history","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkiye klinikleri. Tip etigi-hukuku-tarihi = Turkiye klinikleri journal of medical ethics, law, and history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5336/mdethic.2021-87085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABS TRACT The present study was conducted to determine the ethi- cal sensitivity of physicians in the discipline of orthopedics and traumatology. The study, conducted between March and April 2020, followed a cross-sectional design and included 234 physicians. Although sampling was not performed, physicians in the discipline of ortho- pedics and traumatology who complied with the selection criteria constituted the sample. Data collection was performed using an online form. Necessary permissions were obtained to conduct the study. The average age of all participants was 37.27±7.92 years. Of the partici- pants, 96.6% were male. Further, 50.5% of the participants were specialist orthopedic physicians and 85.5% were willingly employed. Of the participants, 68.4% stated that they received ethics training during their academic life and 70.9% stated that they received no ethics trai- ning during their professional life. Of the participants, 52.1% stated that they had knowledge about ethics, 62.4% stated that they experien- ced ethical dilemmas and 36.8% stated that they had resolved the ethical dilemma they encountered. The total mean score for physicians in the discipline of orthopedics and traumatology on the Ethical Sensitivity Scale was 89.70±17.00. In addition, ethical sensitivity was higher for physicians who had an academic title and over 5 years of experience in the discipline of orthopedics and traumatology, who were willingly employed, who had received ethics training, and who had independently resolved an ethical dilemma. It is thought that these findings can be used to develop models based on an holistic ethical approach, espe-cially for physicians in the discipline of orthopedics and traumatology.
骨科和创伤学医师的伦理敏感性:一项横断面研究
ABS:本研究旨在确定骨科和创伤学医师的道德敏感性。该研究于2020年3月至4月进行,采用横断面设计,包括234名医生。虽然没有进行抽样,但符合选择标准的骨科和创伤学学科的医生构成了样本。数据收集使用在线表格进行。获得必要的许可进行研究。所有参与者的平均年龄为37.27±7.92岁。在参与者中,96.6%是男性。此外,50.5%的受访者是骨科专科医生,85.5%是自愿受雇。68.4%的受访者表示在学术生涯中接受过伦理培训,70.9%的受访者表示在职业生涯中没有接受过伦理培训。受访者中,52.1%表示对伦理有一定的认识,62.4%表示曾遇到过伦理困境,36.8%表示曾解决过遇到的伦理困境。骨科创伤科医师伦理敏感性量表总平均得分为89.70±17.00分。此外,具有学术职称和5年以上骨科创伤学科工作经验、自愿受聘、接受过伦理培训、独立解决过伦理困境的医师伦理敏感性较高。人们认为,这些发现可以用于开发基于整体伦理方法的模型,特别是对于骨科和创伤学学科的医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信