Epidemiology of Traumatic Spinal Injury: A 15-Year Retrospective Study of 1092 Cases

S. Jc, Hope Jmv, D. Souleymane, Kassé An, Diouf Jd, Ni An, B. Thiam, M. Diallo, Camara Ehs, M. HabibSy
{"title":"Epidemiology of Traumatic Spinal Injury: A 15-Year Retrospective Study of 1092 Cases","authors":"S. Jc, Hope Jmv, D. Souleymane, Kassé An, Diouf Jd, Ni An, B. Thiam, M. Diallo, Camara Ehs, M. HabibSy","doi":"10.4172/2165-7939.1000429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Spinal trauma is a well‑documented problem in developed countries but literature has been mute on this problem in developing counties. The purpose of this study was to elucidate epidemiological characteristics of spine trauma in our center over a 15-year period. Methods: All consecutive patients with acute spinal trauma who were admitted in our center from March 2003 to March 2018 were included. The analysis was focused on patient-related demographic characteristics, cause and mechanism of injury, level and type of injury, neurological deficit, associated injuries, management and outcome. All of the statistical calculations were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Statistical analyses were conducted using the Student t-test and nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U-test, Kruskal-Wallis test). Values for p<0.05 were regarded as statistically significant and all confidence intervals were expressed at 95%. Results: A total of 1,092 patients with acute traumatic spinal injuries were managed in our trauma center. There were 74.3% males and 25.7% females with mean age 34.5 years. Young adults (age group: 18-39 years) were more affected with 58.9%. The leading mechanism of injury was compression with 39.2%. The most common cause of accident was motor vehicle collision accident (58.5%) followed by high-energy falls (32.6%). Six hundred eighty-seven patients (62.8%) had spinal cord injury, with 14.4% complete tetraplegia and 7.7% complete paraplegia. Overall, the use of operative treatment (64.8%) exceeded that of conservative treatment (35.2%). Conclusion: This study’s unique feature of delineating variables with statistical significance trending toward better management provides useful data to guide future researches, benchmarking, public health policy, and efficient resource allocation for the management of spine trauma.","PeriodicalId":89593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine","volume":"07 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7939.1000429","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7939.1000429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Spinal trauma is a well‑documented problem in developed countries but literature has been mute on this problem in developing counties. The purpose of this study was to elucidate epidemiological characteristics of spine trauma in our center over a 15-year period. Methods: All consecutive patients with acute spinal trauma who were admitted in our center from March 2003 to March 2018 were included. The analysis was focused on patient-related demographic characteristics, cause and mechanism of injury, level and type of injury, neurological deficit, associated injuries, management and outcome. All of the statistical calculations were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Statistical analyses were conducted using the Student t-test and nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U-test, Kruskal-Wallis test). Values for p<0.05 were regarded as statistically significant and all confidence intervals were expressed at 95%. Results: A total of 1,092 patients with acute traumatic spinal injuries were managed in our trauma center. There were 74.3% males and 25.7% females with mean age 34.5 years. Young adults (age group: 18-39 years) were more affected with 58.9%. The leading mechanism of injury was compression with 39.2%. The most common cause of accident was motor vehicle collision accident (58.5%) followed by high-energy falls (32.6%). Six hundred eighty-seven patients (62.8%) had spinal cord injury, with 14.4% complete tetraplegia and 7.7% complete paraplegia. Overall, the use of operative treatment (64.8%) exceeded that of conservative treatment (35.2%). Conclusion: This study’s unique feature of delineating variables with statistical significance trending toward better management provides useful data to guide future researches, benchmarking, public health policy, and efficient resource allocation for the management of spine trauma.
外伤性脊髓损伤的流行病学:1092例15年回顾性研究
背景:脊柱创伤在发达国家是一个有充分记录的问题,但文献对发展中国家的这一问题一直沉默。本研究的目的是阐明本中心15年来脊柱创伤的流行病学特征。方法:纳入2003年3月至2018年3月在我中心连续收治的急性脊柱创伤患者。分析的重点是患者相关的人口学特征、损伤的原因和机制、损伤的程度和类型、神经功能缺损、相关损伤、管理和结局。所有统计计算均使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)进行。采用学生t检验和非参数检验(Mann-Whitney u检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验)进行统计分析。p<0.05认为有统计学意义,所有置信区间均以95%表示。结果:我院创伤中心共收治急性外伤性脊髓损伤患者1092例。男性占74.3%,女性占25.7%,平均年龄34.5岁。青壮年(18-39岁)患病率更高,为58.9%。损伤机制以压迫为主,占39.2%。最常见的事故原因是机动车碰撞事故(58.5%),其次是高能坠落事故(32.6%)。脊髓损伤687例(62.8%),其中完全四肢瘫痪14.4%,完全截瘫7.7%。总体而言,手术治疗的使用率(64.8%)超过保守治疗(35.2%)。结论:本研究独特的特点是描述了具有统计学意义的变量,趋向于更好的管理,为指导未来的研究、标杆制定、公共卫生政策和有效的资源分配提供了有用的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信