A comparative study of upper body strength training exercise vs. treadmill walking on patients with intermittent claudication

Chaitsi Jani, Pukur I. Thekdi, Vijay Thakore
{"title":"A comparative study of upper body strength training exercise vs. treadmill walking on patients with intermittent claudication","authors":"Chaitsi Jani, Pukur I. Thekdi, Vijay Thakore","doi":"10.5455/ACES.20170503081251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Intermittent claudication is one of the symptoms of painful Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) in which walk ing was conventionally used treatment, though forcing patients with PAD to walk with increasing pain is challenging. The purpose of the study was to compare the effect of upper body strength training exercise vs. treadmill walking on intermittent claudication through which an alternative, effective and pain free protocol could be implemented in the clinical settings. Methods: In this study fifty four patients were enrolled in two groups through convenience sampling. Data were collected for 18 patients in Group A (upper body strength training) and 16 in group B (treadmill walking) for analysis. Independent t test was used for inter group comparison and ANOVA for intra group comparison of Ankle Brachial Index (ABI), Pain Free Walking Distance (PFWD), Maximum Walking Distance (MWD), Heart Rate (HR) and Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) (p< 0.05). Results: Comparison of both groups for PFWD, HR and WIQ were shown significant difference during post and follow up values while no apparent changes were noted in MWD and ABI. p values for pre-post and pre-follow up phases for all outcome measures except ABI were <0.05 indicated statistical significance. Conclusions: Upper body strength training and treadmill walking both forms of exercise appears to be an effective for improving PFWD, HR and WIQ in intermittent claudication. However, upper body strength training is the primary choice in patients unable to complete treadmill walking training.","PeriodicalId":30641,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical and Experimental Surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical and Experimental Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/ACES.20170503081251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Intermittent claudication is one of the symptoms of painful Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) in which walk ing was conventionally used treatment, though forcing patients with PAD to walk with increasing pain is challenging. The purpose of the study was to compare the effect of upper body strength training exercise vs. treadmill walking on intermittent claudication through which an alternative, effective and pain free protocol could be implemented in the clinical settings. Methods: In this study fifty four patients were enrolled in two groups through convenience sampling. Data were collected for 18 patients in Group A (upper body strength training) and 16 in group B (treadmill walking) for analysis. Independent t test was used for inter group comparison and ANOVA for intra group comparison of Ankle Brachial Index (ABI), Pain Free Walking Distance (PFWD), Maximum Walking Distance (MWD), Heart Rate (HR) and Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) (p< 0.05). Results: Comparison of both groups for PFWD, HR and WIQ were shown significant difference during post and follow up values while no apparent changes were noted in MWD and ABI. p values for pre-post and pre-follow up phases for all outcome measures except ABI were <0.05 indicated statistical significance. Conclusions: Upper body strength training and treadmill walking both forms of exercise appears to be an effective for improving PFWD, HR and WIQ in intermittent claudication. However, upper body strength training is the primary choice in patients unable to complete treadmill walking training.
间歇性跛行患者上身力量训练与踏车行走的比较研究
目的:间歇性跛行是疼痛性外周动脉疾病(PAD)的症状之一,该疾病的常规治疗方法是行走,尽管强迫PAD患者在疼痛加剧的情况下行走是具有挑战性的。该研究的目的是比较上身力量训练与跑步机行走对间歇性跛行的影响,通过这种方法可以在临床环境中实施一种替代的、有效的、无痛的方案。方法:采用方便抽样法将54例患者分为两组。收集A组18例(上肢力量训练)和B组16例(跑步机步行)的数据进行分析。踝关节肱指数(Ankle Brachial Index, ABI)、无痛步行距离(Pain - Free Walking Distance, PFWD)、最大步行距离(Maximum Walking Distance, MWD)、心率(Heart Rate, HR)和步行障碍问卷(Walking Impairment Questionnaire, WIQ)的组间比较采用独立t检验,组内比较采用方差分析(ANOVA) (p< 0.05)。结果:两组患者PFWD、HR、WIQ在术后及随访值比较差异均有统计学意义,而MWD、ABI无明显变化。除ABI外,随访前后各指标p值均<0.05,有统计学意义。结论:上身力量训练和跑步机行走这两种形式的运动似乎对改善间歇性跛行患者的PFWD、HR和WIQ有效。然而,对于无法完成跑步机步行训练的患者,上身力量训练是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信