A Rangelands Conundrum – the Division Within and Among Producers and Stakeholders Regarding Climate Change: Addressing the Challenge to Promote and Gain Consensus of Perception

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
D. Lloyd, David George
{"title":"A Rangelands Conundrum – the Division Within and Among Producers and Stakeholders Regarding Climate Change: Addressing the Challenge to Promote and Gain Consensus of Perception","authors":"D. Lloyd, David George","doi":"10.53060/prsq.2022-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The science of climate change is almost universally accepted by the science community, yet producers and other key stakeholders in the rangelands are divided in their beliefs and understandings of climate change and the part that climate change plays in extreme events that impact their businesses. To counteract that, this article suggests that emphasis on sound, educationally framed climate information will arm producers and stakeholders with leading-edge knowledge and techniques to meet the challenges of rapidly reducing their emissions and building resilience. They will require skills, knowledge, leadership and resources to adapt to a new reality. It is suggested that collaborative and innovative strategies are needed. Extension programs that are active, results-oriented and collaborative, such as those between multiple stakeholders, government and research institutes, are necessary. Inaction should not be justified through past mistakes, which must not be repeated. Authentic evaluation examining end-results and practice change are essential. This article identifies a series of strategies for future engagement with producers, and discusses resistance to change. Various methods for collecting support from producers and stakeholders are considered. It is concluded that incentives and the ways in which knowledge is transferred must be sufficiently robust so that political, industrial and/or ideological sabotage is resisted. This would represent an irreversible, changed approach to rangelands management, use and sustainment.","PeriodicalId":40055,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53060/prsq.2022-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The science of climate change is almost universally accepted by the science community, yet producers and other key stakeholders in the rangelands are divided in their beliefs and understandings of climate change and the part that climate change plays in extreme events that impact their businesses. To counteract that, this article suggests that emphasis on sound, educationally framed climate information will arm producers and stakeholders with leading-edge knowledge and techniques to meet the challenges of rapidly reducing their emissions and building resilience. They will require skills, knowledge, leadership and resources to adapt to a new reality. It is suggested that collaborative and innovative strategies are needed. Extension programs that are active, results-oriented and collaborative, such as those between multiple stakeholders, government and research institutes, are necessary. Inaction should not be justified through past mistakes, which must not be repeated. Authentic evaluation examining end-results and practice change are essential. This article identifies a series of strategies for future engagement with producers, and discusses resistance to change. Various methods for collecting support from producers and stakeholders are considered. It is concluded that incentives and the ways in which knowledge is transferred must be sufficiently robust so that political, industrial and/or ideological sabotage is resisted. This would represent an irreversible, changed approach to rangelands management, use and sustainment.
牧场难题——关于气候变化的生产者和利益相关者内部和之间的分歧:应对挑战以促进和获得认知共识
气候变化科学几乎被科学界普遍接受,但牧场的生产者和其他关键利益相关者对气候变化的信念和理解存在分歧,气候变化在影响其业务的极端事件中所起的作用也存在分歧。为了解决这一问题,本文建议强调健全的、教育框架的气候信息,将为生产者和利益相关者提供前沿知识和技术,以应对迅速减少排放和建立复原力的挑战。他们需要技能、知识、领导力和资源来适应新的现实。建议采取协作和创新战略。积极的、以结果为导向的、协作的推广项目是必要的,比如多个利益相关者、政府和研究机构之间的推广项目。不应以过去的错误为不作为辩护,过去的错误绝不能重演。检查最终结果和实践变化的真实评估是必不可少的。本文确定了未来与制作人合作的一系列策略,并讨论了对变革的抵制。考虑了从生产者和利益相关者那里收集支持的各种方法。结论是,激励和知识转移的方式必须足够有力,以抵制政治、工业和/或意识形态的破坏。这将是一种不可逆转的、改变了的牧场管理、利用和维持方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信