Effect of adjunctive transcranial direct current stimulation and cognitive behavior therapy on headache disability in episodic frequent or chronic tension-type headache: A pilot, exploratory study

Saloni Gupta, D. Goel, Shobit Garg, S. Tikka, Preeti Mishra, Priya Tyagi
{"title":"Effect of adjunctive transcranial direct current stimulation and cognitive behavior therapy on headache disability in episodic frequent or chronic tension-type headache: A pilot, exploratory study","authors":"Saloni Gupta, D. Goel, Shobit Garg, S. Tikka, Preeti Mishra, Priya Tyagi","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_52_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Literature suggests that non-pharmacological treatments like non-invasive brain stimulation and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) may be used as augments in the management of Tension-Type Headache (TTH). Aims and Objectives: To assess the efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) compared to treatment as usual (TAU) on headache-related disability and the psychological impact of headache on life of patients suffering from TTH. Materials and Methods: Thirty right-handed TTH patients HDI (headache disability index) > 30 were randomly allocated to group A (tDCS + TAU), group B (CBT + TAU), and group C (TAU). While the primary outcome measure was headache related disability (Headache Disability Index(HDI)), somatic symptoms (Somatic Symptom Severity (SSS-8)), anxiety & depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)) and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Assessments were done at baseline, end of the third and sixth month. Results: We found a statistically significant reduction in HDI (F=12.419, p <0.001), SSS-8 (F=4.587, p=0.010), and HADS-anxiety (F=4.810, p=0.002). tDCS showed better efficacy than CBT, while these two were significantly better than TAU on HDI and SSS-8. On HADS-A also both tDCS and CBT were better than TAU, but showed no significant difference between them. Conclusion: Supplementing non-pharmacological techniques like tDCS and CBT will be effective in reducing headache-related disability and associated psychological symptoms.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"36 1","pages":"140 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_52_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Literature suggests that non-pharmacological treatments like non-invasive brain stimulation and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) may be used as augments in the management of Tension-Type Headache (TTH). Aims and Objectives: To assess the efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) compared to treatment as usual (TAU) on headache-related disability and the psychological impact of headache on life of patients suffering from TTH. Materials and Methods: Thirty right-handed TTH patients HDI (headache disability index) > 30 were randomly allocated to group A (tDCS + TAU), group B (CBT + TAU), and group C (TAU). While the primary outcome measure was headache related disability (Headache Disability Index(HDI)), somatic symptoms (Somatic Symptom Severity (SSS-8)), anxiety & depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)) and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Assessments were done at baseline, end of the third and sixth month. Results: We found a statistically significant reduction in HDI (F=12.419, p <0.001), SSS-8 (F=4.587, p=0.010), and HADS-anxiety (F=4.810, p=0.002). tDCS showed better efficacy than CBT, while these two were significantly better than TAU on HDI and SSS-8. On HADS-A also both tDCS and CBT were better than TAU, but showed no significant difference between them. Conclusion: Supplementing non-pharmacological techniques like tDCS and CBT will be effective in reducing headache-related disability and associated psychological symptoms.
辅助经颅直流电刺激和认知行为治疗对发作性频繁或慢性紧张性头痛患者头痛功能障碍的影响:一项初步探索性研究
背景:文献表明,非药物治疗如非侵入性脑刺激和认知行为疗法(CBT)可以作为管理紧张性头痛(TTH)的补充。目的和目的:比较经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和认知行为疗法(CBT)与常规治疗(TAU)对TTH患者头痛相关残疾的疗效以及头痛对患者生活的心理影响。材料与方法:将30例右利手TTH患者HDI(头痛失能指数)bbb30随机分为A组(tDCS + TAU)、B组(CBT + TAU)和C组(TAU)。而主要结局指标是头痛相关残疾(头痛残疾指数(HDI))、躯体症状(躯体症状严重程度(SSS-8))、焦虑和抑郁(医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS))和睡眠质量(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI))。评估在基线、第三个月和第六个月结束时进行。结果:我们发现HDI (F=12.419, p <0.001)、SSS-8 (F=4.587, p=0.010)和hads -焦虑(F=4.810, p=0.002)有统计学意义的降低。tDCS对HDI和SSS-8的疗效优于CBT,两者均显著优于TAU。在HADS-A方面,tDCS和CBT均优于TAU,但两者之间无显著差异。结论:辅以tDCS和CBT等非药物治疗可有效减轻头痛相关残疾及相关心理症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信