Rhetorical Self-Fashioning in Aramburu: A Contemporary Take on Cervantine Techniques

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE
MESTER Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5070/m3481042146
Alison Posey
{"title":"Rhetorical Self-Fashioning in Aramburu: A Contemporary Take on Cervantine Techniques","authors":"Alison Posey","doi":"10.5070/m3481042146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Posey, Alison | Abstract: In Cervantes’ Don Quijote (1605), Dulcinea does not participate in any dialogue, and yet still appears a vivid character as real as the other female characters who do speak in the novel. Dulcinea, a figment of others’ imaginations, forms a sharp contrast with the character of Marcela, who fashions an authoritative self through dialogue with other characters. Marcela’s self, like Dulcinea’s, is relational to others’; however, her self-fashioning frees her from the objectification of Dulcineism and instead Marcela makes herself a character that transgresses conventional narratives, both cultural and literary. Likewise, a similar rejection of Dulcineism and a desire to craft her life story through her dialectical exchanges with the rest of the characters enables Miren, a principal female character in Aramburu’s Patria (2016), to fashion a self that actively contravenes the general perspective of her son’s supposed crimes as an etarra. In this analysis, I consider the Cervantine technique of rhetorical self-fashioning in characters such as Marcela and I trace this technique in the development of the character of Miren in Aramburu’s contemporary novel, Patria. Cervantes’ Marcela inaugurates the self-fashioning character in Western fiction, which is expanded by Aramburu four-hundred years later with his female character, Miren. Like Marcela, Miren must fashion herself against a polyphony of voices, frequently male, that provide a variety of narratives shaping the events of her life. I argue that Aramburu’s character, like Cervantes’, is empowered to author her own narrative to contravene an undesired outcome. Furthermore, both female characters use dialogue to reject the common literary tendency towards Dulcineism and, through relational rhetoric, disregard conventional narratives in favor of creating their own: a remarkable choice for female characters, both then and now.","PeriodicalId":40833,"journal":{"name":"MESTER","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MESTER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/m3481042146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Author(s): Posey, Alison | Abstract: In Cervantes’ Don Quijote (1605), Dulcinea does not participate in any dialogue, and yet still appears a vivid character as real as the other female characters who do speak in the novel. Dulcinea, a figment of others’ imaginations, forms a sharp contrast with the character of Marcela, who fashions an authoritative self through dialogue with other characters. Marcela’s self, like Dulcinea’s, is relational to others’; however, her self-fashioning frees her from the objectification of Dulcineism and instead Marcela makes herself a character that transgresses conventional narratives, both cultural and literary. Likewise, a similar rejection of Dulcineism and a desire to craft her life story through her dialectical exchanges with the rest of the characters enables Miren, a principal female character in Aramburu’s Patria (2016), to fashion a self that actively contravenes the general perspective of her son’s supposed crimes as an etarra. In this analysis, I consider the Cervantine technique of rhetorical self-fashioning in characters such as Marcela and I trace this technique in the development of the character of Miren in Aramburu’s contemporary novel, Patria. Cervantes’ Marcela inaugurates the self-fashioning character in Western fiction, which is expanded by Aramburu four-hundred years later with his female character, Miren. Like Marcela, Miren must fashion herself against a polyphony of voices, frequently male, that provide a variety of narratives shaping the events of her life. I argue that Aramburu’s character, like Cervantes’, is empowered to author her own narrative to contravene an undesired outcome. Furthermore, both female characters use dialogue to reject the common literary tendency towards Dulcineism and, through relational rhetoric, disregard conventional narratives in favor of creating their own: a remarkable choice for female characters, both then and now.
《阿拉姆布鲁》中的修辞自我塑造:塞万提斯技法的当代诠释
摘要:在塞万提斯的《唐吉诃德》(1605)中,杜尔西内亚没有参与任何对话,但与小说中其他说话的女性角色一样,杜尔西内亚仍然是一个生动的角色。杜尔西内亚是一个虚构的人物,与马塞拉形成了鲜明的对比,马塞拉通过与其他人物的对话塑造了一个权威的自我。玛塞拉的自我,就像杜尔西内亚的自我一样,是与他人相关的;然而,她的自我塑造使她摆脱了杜尔西内主义的客观化,相反,玛塞拉使自己成为一个超越传统叙事的角色,无论是文化还是文学。同样,对杜尔西内主义的类似拒绝,以及通过与其他角色的辩证交流来塑造自己的生活故事的愿望,使阿拉姆布鲁的《Patria》(2016)中的主要女性角色米伦塑造了一个积极地违背她儿子作为一个etarra被假定犯罪的普遍观点的自我。在这个分析中,我考虑了塞万提斯式的自我塑造修辞技巧比如在Marcela的角色中,我在Aramburu的当代小说Patria中的Miren角色的发展中找到了这种技巧。塞万提斯的《玛塞拉》开创了西方小说中自我塑造的角色,四百年后,阿拉姆布鲁用他的女性角色米伦扩展了这一角色。和马塞拉一样,米伦必须在各种声音中塑造自己,这些声音通常是男性的,这些声音提供了塑造她生活事件的各种叙事。我认为,阿拉姆布鲁的角色,就像塞万提斯的角色一样,被赋予了创作自己的故事的权力,以避免不希望的结果。此外,两位女性角色都使用对话来抵制杜尔辛主义的普遍文学倾向,并通过关系修辞,无视传统叙事,倾向于创造自己的叙事:这对女性角色来说是一个非凡的选择,无论是当时还是现在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MESTER
MESTER LITERATURE, ROMANCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信