A Cross-Nested Logit Model for Trip Type-Mode Choice: An Application

Q3 Engineering
Valerian Kwigizile, D. Chimba, T. Sando
{"title":"A Cross-Nested Logit Model for Trip Type-Mode Choice: An Application","authors":"Valerian Kwigizile, D. Chimba, T. Sando","doi":"10.4399/97888548388643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We applied the cross-nested logit (CNL) model to home-based trips reported in the 2001 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) database to explain individuals' choices of trip type and mode to use. We also compared the CNL model results to those from the nested-logit (NL) model and the network Generalized Extreme Value (Network GEV) model. Alternative modes (private, public, walk and other) are available to each of the four trip purposes (home-based work, home-based shopping, home-based recreational, and homebased other), namely the nests. The results indicated that the CNL model conveniently models decisions on trip type and mode to use made by individual travelers. Its results are comparable to those of the network GEV model. The models identify the impact of individuals' socioeconomics and alternative attributes on trip type and mode choices. The presence of children in a household increases the probability of choosing a private mode while it decreases the probability of using public transport or walk. Private mode and public transport were more attractive to travelers than walking when considering the combined trip distance and travel time. Individuals from households with higher income prefer private mode to public transportation. However, income is not a significant factor on a decision to walk. Since the data used is a national-wide database, a study in which a different data set collected locally is recommended. The NHTS data set may suffer from spatial variation among the travelers and hence produce inconclusive results.","PeriodicalId":39032,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Transportation Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":"29-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Transportation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4399/97888548388643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We applied the cross-nested logit (CNL) model to home-based trips reported in the 2001 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) database to explain individuals' choices of trip type and mode to use. We also compared the CNL model results to those from the nested-logit (NL) model and the network Generalized Extreme Value (Network GEV) model. Alternative modes (private, public, walk and other) are available to each of the four trip purposes (home-based work, home-based shopping, home-based recreational, and homebased other), namely the nests. The results indicated that the CNL model conveniently models decisions on trip type and mode to use made by individual travelers. Its results are comparable to those of the network GEV model. The models identify the impact of individuals' socioeconomics and alternative attributes on trip type and mode choices. The presence of children in a household increases the probability of choosing a private mode while it decreases the probability of using public transport or walk. Private mode and public transport were more attractive to travelers than walking when considering the combined trip distance and travel time. Individuals from households with higher income prefer private mode to public transportation. However, income is not a significant factor on a decision to walk. Since the data used is a national-wide database, a study in which a different data set collected locally is recommended. The NHTS data set may suffer from spatial variation among the travelers and hence produce inconclusive results.
旅行类型-模式选择的交叉嵌套Logit模型:一个应用
我们将交叉嵌套logit (CNL)模型应用于2001年全国家庭旅行调查(NHTS)数据库中的家庭旅行报告,以解释个人对旅行类型和使用方式的选择。我们还将CNL模型的结果与嵌套logit (NL)模型和网络广义极值(network GEV)模型的结果进行了比较。四种出行目的(居家工作、居家购物、居家娱乐和居家其他)都有可供选择的模式(私人、公共、步行和其他),即巢。结果表明,CNL模型可以方便地模拟个体出行者对出行方式和出行方式的决策。其结果与网络GEV模型的结果相当。这些模型确定了个体的社会经济和可选属性对出行类型和方式选择的影响。有孩子的家庭增加了选择私人出行方式的可能性,同时降低了使用公共交通或步行出行的可能性。综合考虑出行距离和出行时间,私家车和公共交通对出行者的吸引力大于步行。相对于公共交通,高收入家庭的个人更喜欢乘坐私人交通工具。然而,收入并不是决定步行的重要因素。由于所使用的数据是一个全国性的数据库,因此建议进行一项研究,在研究中使用在当地收集的不同数据集。NHTS数据集在旅行者中可能存在空间差异,因此产生不确定的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Transportation Studies
Advances in Transportation Studies Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信