A Living Spatial Movement of Relation. Reconceptualising Ricœur’s Oneself as Another and Heidegger’s Being and Time

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
P. Downes
{"title":"A Living Spatial Movement of Relation. Reconceptualising Ricœur’s Oneself as Another and Heidegger’s Being and Time","authors":"P. Downes","doi":"10.5195/ERRS.2020.495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beyond the disparate and mainly fleeting references to life in Ricoeur’s Oneself as Another , whether as life as power, living well and with others, or as Ricoeur’s attempt to develop a concept of embodied subjectivity as flesh, which is presumably living flesh, not dead flesh, a further and arguably primordial life principle needs emphasis, namely, living space. Ricoeur’s recognition of the vital significance of space primordiality, as a pivotal dimension that is even prior to language, offers a significant conceptual leap in Ricoeur’s later work, Oneself as Another . Ricoeur’s proposed ontology of the flesh is one dimension towards expression of an authentic phenomenology of spatiality, though not necessarily the only one . Building upon but going beyond Ricoeur, the article explores concentric and diametric spatial interplay in relation to the early Heidegger’s existential spatiality, Angst and care, as candidate living spatial movements. This proposed primordial spatial discourse re-examines Ricoeur’s conatus as power to act, and his quest for a structure of relation to the other that is not closure, separation, or diametric opposition.","PeriodicalId":51981,"journal":{"name":"Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"111-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/ERRS.2020.495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Beyond the disparate and mainly fleeting references to life in Ricoeur’s Oneself as Another , whether as life as power, living well and with others, or as Ricoeur’s attempt to develop a concept of embodied subjectivity as flesh, which is presumably living flesh, not dead flesh, a further and arguably primordial life principle needs emphasis, namely, living space. Ricoeur’s recognition of the vital significance of space primordiality, as a pivotal dimension that is even prior to language, offers a significant conceptual leap in Ricoeur’s later work, Oneself as Another . Ricoeur’s proposed ontology of the flesh is one dimension towards expression of an authentic phenomenology of spatiality, though not necessarily the only one . Building upon but going beyond Ricoeur, the article explores concentric and diametric spatial interplay in relation to the early Heidegger’s existential spatiality, Angst and care, as candidate living spatial movements. This proposed primordial spatial discourse re-examines Ricoeur’s conatus as power to act, and his quest for a structure of relation to the other that is not closure, separation, or diametric opposition.
一个活生生的空间运动的关系。重新概念化Ricœur的“自己是他者”与海德格尔的“存在与时间”
在利科的《作为他者的自己》中,除了对生命的不同的、主要是短暂的提及之外,无论是作为权力的生命,与他人生活得很好,还是作为利科试图发展一种作为肉体的具体化主体性的概念,这可能是活着的肉体,而不是死的肉体,一个进一步的、可以说是原始的生命原则需要强调,即生活空间。利科尔对空间原始性的重要意义的认识,作为一个甚至先于语言的关键维度,为利科尔后来的作品《作为他者的自己》提供了一个重要的概念飞跃。利科提出的肉体本体论是表达真实的空间现象学的一个维度,尽管不一定是唯一的一个。本文以利科为基础,但又超越了利科,探讨了与早期海德格尔的存在空间性、焦虑和关怀相关的同心和直径空间相互作用,作为候选的生活空间运动。这个提议的原始空间话语重新审视了利科作为行动力量的状态,以及他对一种非封闭、分离或截然对立的与他者的关系结构的追求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies
Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信