Radioactive Seed Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in a Community Hospital Setting

J. Wheeler, Karlyn K. Harrod, Fang Liu, E. Garber, Lisa Grove-Narayan, A. Moore
{"title":"Radioactive Seed Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in a Community Hospital Setting","authors":"J. Wheeler, Karlyn K. Harrod, Fang Liu, E. Garber, Lisa Grove-Narayan, A. Moore","doi":"10.5539/CCO.V5N1P25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare the positive margin rates for women with nonpalpable breast tumors whom had wire localization compared to radioactive seed localization in a small community hospital. Introduction: Wire localized (WL) breast biopsies have been performed on patients with nonpalpable breast lesions for many years. Radioactive seed localization (RSL) offers advantages of patient comfort and scheduling convenience. There is an extensive literature from large centers regarding the RSL technique. Little is known whether physicians performing these procedures in smaller community hospitals can achieve comparable negative margin rates as those performed with wire localization. Methods: The thirty-six patients who underwent wire localized breast conserving surgery between September 18, 2013 and December 10, 2014, were compared to the 48 radioactive seed localization patients resected between February 12, 2014 and December 18, 2014. The primary objective was to determine if the introduction of the radioactive seed localization technique significantly changed the positive margin rate. Results: Two of 36 wire localized breast biopsied patients had positive margins, compared to 5 of 48 radioactive seed localization patients, a difference which is not statistically different. The specimen weight was larger for the patients treated with the RSL technique. There was a trend toward a higher positive margin rate with older patients. Conclusion: The positive margin rate was similar between the wire localized and radioactive seed localized patients, and comparable to those in the published literature.","PeriodicalId":89904,"journal":{"name":"Cancer and clinical oncology","volume":"5 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5539/CCO.V5N1P25","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer and clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/CCO.V5N1P25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the positive margin rates for women with nonpalpable breast tumors whom had wire localization compared to radioactive seed localization in a small community hospital. Introduction: Wire localized (WL) breast biopsies have been performed on patients with nonpalpable breast lesions for many years. Radioactive seed localization (RSL) offers advantages of patient comfort and scheduling convenience. There is an extensive literature from large centers regarding the RSL technique. Little is known whether physicians performing these procedures in smaller community hospitals can achieve comparable negative margin rates as those performed with wire localization. Methods: The thirty-six patients who underwent wire localized breast conserving surgery between September 18, 2013 and December 10, 2014, were compared to the 48 radioactive seed localization patients resected between February 12, 2014 and December 18, 2014. The primary objective was to determine if the introduction of the radioactive seed localization technique significantly changed the positive margin rate. Results: Two of 36 wire localized breast biopsied patients had positive margins, compared to 5 of 48 radioactive seed localization patients, a difference which is not statistically different. The specimen weight was larger for the patients treated with the RSL technique. There was a trend toward a higher positive margin rate with older patients. Conclusion: The positive margin rate was similar between the wire localized and radioactive seed localized patients, and comparable to those in the published literature.
放射源定位在社区医院不可触及的乳腺病变中的应用
目的:比较某小型社区医院行钢丝定位与放射性种子定位的女性不可触及乳腺肿瘤的切缘阳性率。导读:钢丝定位(WL)乳腺活组织检查已进行了多年的患者不可触及的乳房病变。放射性粒子定位(RSL)具有患者舒适和调度方便的优点。关于RSL技术,有大量来自大型中心的文献。很少有人知道,在较小的社区医院进行这些手术的医生是否能达到与使用钢丝定位的医生相当的负利润率。方法:将2013年9月18日至2014年12月10日行保乳钢丝定位手术的36例患者与2014年2月12日至2014年12月18日行放射性粒子定位手术的48例患者进行比较。主要目的是确定引入放射性种子定位技术是否显著改变阳性边缘率。结果:36例钢丝定位乳腺活检患者中2例边缘阳性,48例放射性粒子定位患者中5例边缘阳性,差异无统计学意义。采用RSL技术治疗的患者标本重量较大。老年患者有较高的阳性切缘率的趋势。结论:钢丝定位与放射性粒子定位的阳性切缘率相近,与文献报道的结果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书