Patent Disclosure Requirement for AI-Assisted inventions: A Comparative Study of EU and India

Q4 Social Sciences
Ashok Hemanth, †. Upputuri, Zehra Özkan Üner
{"title":"Patent Disclosure Requirement for AI-Assisted inventions: A Comparative Study of EU and India","authors":"Ashok Hemanth, †. Upputuri, Zehra Özkan Üner","doi":"10.56042/jipr.v28i2.1178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patent is based on the concept of quid pro quo . It requires the applicant to draft the application in such a way so that it satisfies the doctrines of written description, enablement, and best mode. However, in case of AI-related invention, the situation is tricky. Most of the inventions carried out by AI has black box scenario—where the inventor also may not be aware of the fact how the invention was exactly carried out by the AI system. The current study delves into the situation regarding how patent offices in Europe and India are dealing with such scenarios. Focussing on the AI-assisted inventions, the study finds out that in Europe, there is a clear guideline about AI-related inventions. The guidelines are tighter than those of the US. On the other hand, India relies on guidelines on computer related invention.","PeriodicalId":39166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v28i2.1178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Patent is based on the concept of quid pro quo . It requires the applicant to draft the application in such a way so that it satisfies the doctrines of written description, enablement, and best mode. However, in case of AI-related invention, the situation is tricky. Most of the inventions carried out by AI has black box scenario—where the inventor also may not be aware of the fact how the invention was exactly carried out by the AI system. The current study delves into the situation regarding how patent offices in Europe and India are dealing with such scenarios. Focussing on the AI-assisted inventions, the study finds out that in Europe, there is a clear guideline about AI-related inventions. The guidelines are tighter than those of the US. On the other hand, India relies on guidelines on computer related invention.
人工智能辅助发明的专利披露要求:欧盟与印度的比较研究
专利是基于交换条件的概念。它要求申请人以这样一种方式起草申请,使其满足书面描述、使能关系和最佳模式的原则。然而,在人工智能相关发明的情况下,情况就棘手了。大多数由AI完成的发明都有黑箱场景——发明人也可能不知道AI系统是如何完成发明的。目前的研究深入研究了欧洲和印度专利局如何处理这种情况。针对人工智能辅助发明,研究发现,在欧洲,人工智能相关发明有明确的指导方针。这些指导方针比美国的更为严格。另一方面,印度依赖于计算机相关发明的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信