Special Considerations for Measuring Energy Expenditure with Doubly Labeled Water under Atypical Conditions

S. Bhutani, Natalie M. Racine, T. Shriver, D. Schoeller
{"title":"Special Considerations for Measuring Energy Expenditure with Doubly Labeled Water under Atypical Conditions","authors":"S. Bhutani, Natalie M. Racine, T. Shriver, D. Schoeller","doi":"10.4172/2165-7904.S5-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global increase in the prevalence of obesity has dramatically increased interest in understanding the factors that influence human total energy expenditure (TEE). This in turn has increased interest in the doubly labeled water (DLW) method, a technique for measurement of total energy expenditure in free-living humans. The increasing use of this method is attributed to its portability, objectivity, minimal invasiveness, high accuracy and good precision. Although a relatively standard protocol for the method has emerged, the new generation of users often is unfamiliar with rationale behind aspects of the protocol as well as the approaches to avoid or correct for in situations that are not covered by the standard protocol procedure. The primary uncommon situations like introduction of isotopically different diet and fluids with or without geographical relocation, seasonal and temperature variations, activity level of participants etc. during or prior to the DLW measurements can lead to shift in baseline abundance of 2H and 18O or tracer elimination, resulting in moderate to large errors in the measured TEE. These unique situations call for special modifications to the conventional protocol to minimize errors. The objective of the present review was to assemble a list of frequently asked questions and the issues they represent, and then examine the available literature to describe and explain the modifications to the standard DLW protocol to maintain the method’s accuracy. This discussion of DLW protocol modification can be an excellent resource for investigators who intend to use this measurement technique for interesting and uncommon study designs.","PeriodicalId":89692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obesity & weight loss therapy","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7904.S5-002","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obesity & weight loss therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7904.S5-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

The global increase in the prevalence of obesity has dramatically increased interest in understanding the factors that influence human total energy expenditure (TEE). This in turn has increased interest in the doubly labeled water (DLW) method, a technique for measurement of total energy expenditure in free-living humans. The increasing use of this method is attributed to its portability, objectivity, minimal invasiveness, high accuracy and good precision. Although a relatively standard protocol for the method has emerged, the new generation of users often is unfamiliar with rationale behind aspects of the protocol as well as the approaches to avoid or correct for in situations that are not covered by the standard protocol procedure. The primary uncommon situations like introduction of isotopically different diet and fluids with or without geographical relocation, seasonal and temperature variations, activity level of participants etc. during or prior to the DLW measurements can lead to shift in baseline abundance of 2H and 18O or tracer elimination, resulting in moderate to large errors in the measured TEE. These unique situations call for special modifications to the conventional protocol to minimize errors. The objective of the present review was to assemble a list of frequently asked questions and the issues they represent, and then examine the available literature to describe and explain the modifications to the standard DLW protocol to maintain the method’s accuracy. This discussion of DLW protocol modification can be an excellent resource for investigators who intend to use this measurement technique for interesting and uncommon study designs.
在非典型条件下用双标水测量能量消耗的特殊考虑
全球肥胖患病率的增加极大地增加了人们对了解影响人类总能量消耗(TEE)因素的兴趣。这反过来又增加了人们对双标签水(DLW)法的兴趣,这是一种测量自由生活人类总能量消耗的技术。该方法具有可移植性、客观性、侵入性小、准确度高、精密度好等优点,应用日益广泛。虽然该方法已经出现了相对标准的协议,但新一代用户往往不熟悉协议各方面背后的基本原理,以及在标准协议程序未涵盖的情况下避免或纠正的方法。主要不常见的情况,如在DLW测量期间或之前引入同位素不同的饮食和液体,无论是否有地理迁移、季节和温度变化、参与者的活动水平等,都可能导致2H和18O基线丰度的变化或示踪剂的消除,从而导致测量的TEE出现中等到较大的误差。这些独特的情况要求对常规协议进行特殊修改,以尽量减少错误。本综述的目的是收集常见问题及其所代表的问题的列表,然后检查现有文献来描述和解释对标准DLW协议的修改,以保持方法的准确性。对于想要使用这种测量技术进行有趣的和不常见的研究设计的研究者来说,这个关于DLW协议修改的讨论是一个很好的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信